|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: idiot moviegoers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Ribbens
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 118
From: Los Angeles
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 11-08-1999 01:24 AM
That's AMC. Had to be fixed after hours? Had to stop the projector twice?I would have, depending on how far the splice got onto the platter, either fixed it right then(only if the projector had to be stopped to get the show back in frame, But that would not have happened since all frame knobs would be centered) or fixed it durring the intermission. Come to think of it, I would not do either since I would have made sure when I built the show up that it was in frame!!!!  ------------------
Scott
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-08-1999 04:20 PM
Rewinding a platter is like putting toothpaste back into the tube! It can be done but believe me, you don't want to do it unless you HAVE to! I was playing Phantom of the Opera here at M.H. College. We played it silent and hired a live orchestra to play the score. (I Musici de Montreal) Well, the place was packed (850 seats) and the fire alarm goes off in the middle of the movie. We had to "dump" the place! At $20 a ticket, of course we had to rewind it! AND I had to re-sync the orchestra to the film! (The conductor didn't speak English and I don't speak French -- You should have been listening in on the 'Clear-Com'!!! I had to literally inch the film backward onto the platter, all the while trying to read the title cards off the film. I'd read them off to another guy who'd translate into French. The conductor would check his score, which had the title cards written down on it and say, "oui" or "non". He'd read out his title cards from the score and they'd be translated to me and I'd have to try to find it on the film. It was a real [rot13]ZBAXRL SHPX[/rot13]!!! Of course, you know that there are no 'original' prints of Phantom left and the ones that ARE left really SUCK! This one was about ad brittle as tissue paper. I broke it at least 3 times trying to rewind it. It literally crumbled in your hands! (No, it wasn't nitrate. I took a piece of it outside and flame-tested it) I could go on but suffice to say that night was one of my worst horror stories to date!
| IP: Logged
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-08-1999 07:51 PM
You guys actually try to rewind film (on platters, no less!) when something goes wrong? I never did, mostly because I tend to think that audiences would rather miss a few seconds of film if it means that the picture gets back on screen faster. Most of the time, I was running 6000' reels, which are a bit awkward to remove from the projector, carry over to the rewind bench, and then re-mount on the projector (without getting film on the floor , of course), particularly if one has to do all of this in a hurry. Fortunatley, things rarely went so wrong that the show needed to be stopped, but my own gut feeling was that the #1 priority was to get the film running as quickly as possible while avoiding damage to equipment and film. Rewinding would be nice, but it's not a big enough deal to make me want to spend several minutes to do it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ed Johnson
Film Handler
Posts: 24
From: Lancaster, MA/Appleton, WI
Registered: Jul 99
|
posted 11-08-1999 09:44 PM
Here's one that I just remembered:Last june I received a complaint from a customer that the picture quality was "unacceptable" in the theater where he was watching SW-Episode One. This was after the movie had been out for only 4 or 5 weeks and our prints all looked pretty good. Because of this I assumed that the picture was not focused correctly. After watching the movie for a few moments I couldn't determine any problems at all-- it was quite sharp and it looked as good as it did when we first got the print. I told this to the customer and he replied, "Look how blurry it is at the left of the screen." (He pointed at the background of a scene where the camera was focused on the foreground-- the blurryness was just the effect of the depth of field of the camera lens.) He then went on to say, "This picture isn't sharp at all. For movie that being played in 70mm, it almost looks like you guys are cheating me and showing it in 35mm!" After that he just walked back to his seat. I didn't get to explain to him that it was, in fact, a 35mm print that we were showing and that Episode One was being shown everywhere that way. It was one of the stranger complaints I've received... ------------------ Ed Johnson Lawrence University Appleton, WI
| IP: Logged
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 11-10-1999 10:12 PM
Well, I USUALLY don't rewind but there were a couple of things going on.1) Tickets were $20 a crack! -- To pay the orchestra, mostly. The place was sold out (850 tickets) I would have been STORMED if I didn't 2) This theatre doesn't have cut-offs from the fire alarm. It took a while for me to figure out what the hell was going on. Probably about a minute. I've never seen the fire alarm in this bldg. before. My mind was on the film. Believe me, this film was BAD! There's no horn in the booth. I couldn't hear it over the noise. 3) The orchestra guys obviously didn't have time to mark their places on the way out the door. Remember, I had to help a French-Speaking conductor re-sync an entire orchestra!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|