|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Projection as a career?
|
|
|
Erika Hellgren
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 168
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-13-1999 02:36 PM
I run a 16 plex, with timers and status boards, and I'm always the only one running the booth during a shift. The timers give me extra time that I use to do cleaning chores, or theatre checks - anything to make sure that no presentation is deminished just because I'm a platter jockey. No movies ever start up with something wrong with the thread - as long as I'm in the booth. If I couldn't handle it, I would go down to a smaller theatre. It would be hard, but I know I could run a 24 plex by myself better than any team of AMC ushers. (Wow, that's not saying much, is it?) It doesn't matter how many screens you have, the quality doesn't deminish just because the number is higher. In my opinion, it all depends on the efficiency of the operator.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Chris Erwin
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 195
From: Olive Hill,KY
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 10-13-1999 06:51 PM
I agree with your comment Erika about the operator, but I would like to add this point: the operator is a product of their training. (not always,but many times at multiplex houses) If the operator was trained well,the number of screens shouldn't matter. But,how it is now,many places have ushers,janitors,ticket people,etc. in the booths and their training in very minimal to none. Then the equation looks like this: More Screens=More Problems=More refunds, etc. (Ok time to rant...put projectionist back in the booths! If some one wants to learn to run the equipment properly and try to do a good job,fine. But quit pulling people off the floor or off the street and putting them in the booth. Half the time they don't care,half do their job,and have no concern for me or the next person that gets their print. Ok,I feel better now.--Chris
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-16-1999 07:39 PM
Allright, allright....what is this nonsense about running 6000' reels on automated changeovers being _more_ difficult?I'll take the largest complex you can run platters...add two and I'll run it automated changeovers. On Thursdays I'll have my new films/trailers and old films/trailers done first too. BTW...on all this boasting about how many screens everyone is boasting about being able to run, how many times do you get to check EACH screen to ensure optimal focus? I don't know of many platter guys that ever look out after the show starts and don't even do that if they use timers/clocks on the larger plexes. Steve
| IP: Logged
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-19-1999 03:38 PM
I check each projector every time I walk down the hall. Since I walk up and down the rows about 100 times a day, each one gets checked 100 times!Okay, I exagerate, but I think people get the point. No matter how big or small your booth you should be constantly checking things. My suggestion is to just stay on your feet! So many people I train in the booth are good for about 2 months then they just slack off. Next thing you know, they are in one of three places. 1) watching a movie. 2) sitting at the desk reading the newspaper. 3) outside smoking. If you just stay on your feet and walk up and down the row, (Except for breaks, etc.), you'll almost automatically be checking projectors! Any good projectionist knows that more than HALF of the problems you have can be detected by sound alone! Remember that scene in "Cinema Paradiso"?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 10-20-1999 01:39 PM
I must agree with Erika (once again) with her comments above. In particular, the focus issue. Running emulsion out (soundtrack up) on platters, checking focus is NOT an issue. The only time it would be is if there is something mechanically loose in the lens holder/turret or the emulsion is wound in. I've ran years and years this way and although I always checked for optimal focus, it was never needed.Also, on the late model Christie platters, it's awful hard to make a threading error, as their new roller design doesn't allow the film to fall off the rollers and the AW3 was an excellent design to begin with. As to checking all machines in a large complex, no problem. Running a large theatre requires going from machine to machine to rethread and such...one must walk by running machines all the time. Sound plays a big role in troubleshooting too. Most things can be detected by sound (except a douser not opening). I also have used timers for thousands upon thousands of starts in my days and perhaps one in a thousand had a problem such as a jammed douser. Never were there out of frame or out of focus starts and the extremely rare problems were always corrected immediately anyway.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-22-1999 06:10 PM
Ok, I have to take exception to this...I have yet to see a film projected using 2KW and up that didn't have observable focus drift after 20 minutes and annoyingly so after an hour. And that is with soundtrack up or down (BTW every film manufacturer has tested and shown that the film emulsion is more stable if it is stored emulsion in or soundtrack down, and I have proven it time and again on reels now).The gate parts heat up, the lens heats up and expands...it might look "ok" from a quick glance in the port but not so down at the theatre. Every once an a while, I get a person that focuses for the trailers when they start...during the opening credits things have started to drift but still passable but by the 3rd reel there is really no description more fitting than "out of focus." And this is with top lenses by ISCO and Schneider. If you want to see the drift, take binoculars with you around the booth. Steve
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-27-1999 11:46 PM
I've been talking with a guy that I think is pretty knowledgeable. I asked him about 'emulsion in/out'.He said that the reason for that was because during shipping, the film can get hot or cold and expand or contract. This expansion/contraction could cause reticulation (sp?) of the emulsion if it isn't stored emulsion IN. He also said that if you store the film in 'stable' conditions, (eg: temperature), you don't have to worry. It won't make much difference which way it's stored 'cuz the film won't expand/contract. Essentially, he said that you should store the film whatever way works best for you. (I like "out") If you think your film might be subjected to extremes of temperature, them you might want to go with 'emulsion in.' ...Just my $0.02 worth...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|