Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » My Oscar predictions (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: My Oscar predictions
Tom Ferreira
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 203
From: Conway, NH, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-16-2000 04:41 PM      Profile for Tom Ferreira   Email Tom Ferreira   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The reason that "Blame Canada" was nominated, is because it's the song that Trey Parker submitted for consideration. I guess he felt that the rest of the score was a little too much for conservative Academy voters. The unfortunate part is that Mary Kay Bergman who virtually performed every female voice on the show, and thus this entire song, tragically committed suicide last year, so there's no way the song could be performed live.
The most glaring omission in my eyes(besides Jim Carrey, who was terrific in MOTM), is the lack of nominations for Election, a film just as good as American Beauty(which I did like). I do believe it is nominated for screenplay, but it should be among the elite five.
I've been imagining this scenerio all year-Jim Carrey wins the Oscar for Best Actor and is accompanied to the stage by Tony Clifton, who turns out to be----Andy Kaufman! Guess I just watch too much wrestling; speaking of which, Beyond The Mat was not nominated for Best Documentary-word it that it's outstanding.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-16-2000 11:46 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As far as Best Documentary goes, the only one I've seen is Buena Vista Social Club. We just got through playing it this evening.

I can't say I hated it. The music was good and all of the people were interesting. (An old Cuban woman walking down the street smoking a BIG, FAT STOGIE!)

It was a pretty "tedious" movie to watch. We had about 1/2 doz. walkouts. (Out of a house of 225) Most of them were students.

I guess it would have been better if you were interested in the subject matter.... There was this older gentleman who just raved about it.

I'd give it a "**"

My scale:
**** = GREAT!
*** = I'd pay to watch it even though I can see movies for free.
** = I'd watch it for free
* = Waste of film
0 = I could eat a can of Kodak and PUKE a better movie!

 |  IP: Logged

Bryan Redemske
Film Handler

Posts: 70
From: Cedar Falls, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 02-17-2000 03:11 PM      Profile for Bryan Redemske   Email Bryan Redemske   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
chad's still on the Kubrick thing i see...

but i think i'm one of the only ones who thought Tom Hanks kicked ass in The Green Mile, as did everyone else for that matter. come on, the guy made taking a leak look pretty good - you remember the expression on his face....

so, the Green Mile for best picture would be nice. I don't see the big deal about Amercian Beauty; no, i really don't. yeah, it was a little weird but i don't know if it should win everything like everyone thinks its going to. it was good, yes. the best? don't think so.

and i'm still bitter about Saving Private Ryan being screwed so i might boycott the show this year. maybe.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Frandsen
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: Denmark, Europe
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-17-2000 03:24 PM      Profile for Martin Frandsen   Email Martin Frandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As i am a very big film-lover i always see the Oscars live on a big screen with a video projector, i never get any sleep that night as i am in europe and the oscars start at 2 am my time and ends in the morning

As for my oscar predictions, well as living in europe, many of the films have not hit the theaters over here yet, so i'll wait with that.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-18-2000 05:35 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Academy Awards are on here about 1pm our time, but are not telecast until 8.30pm that night so it's a right royal pain in the ass trying to avoid each and every news bulletin that says who has just won as the afternoon progresses. I actually don't bother anymore since Gump beat out Pulp (c'mon guys!).

Once I managed to avoid all the news broadcasts until the show was on at night and set myself up in my lounge room with some popcorn and a couple of thirst quenching ales then summarily fell asleep before they announced best actor and picture.

Damn! Those shows go on longer than a double feature of Gone With The Wind and Lawrence of Arabia.

Best Pic: American Beauty
Best Actor: Denzel
Best Director: Sam Mendes

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Frandsen
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: Denmark, Europe
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-17-2000 12:13 PM      Profile for Martin Frandsen   Email Martin Frandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Looks like oscar night will not be the same this year someone stole the oscar statues the news has reached europe. Hope the police finds them, and hopefully the academy did not put any names on the oscars yet! what a fine mess that could be!


 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-17-2000 01:35 PM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not to worry, I guess. The names were not yet engraved on those Oscars and the company which makes them promises to have replacements before Oscar night. Expect the excitement to evaporate by the 26th and Oscar night will be as boring as ever.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Frandsen
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: Denmark, Europe
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-17-2000 03:21 PM      Profile for Martin Frandsen   Email Martin Frandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I hope the Oscars wont be to boring as i plan to stay up all night and wacth it live. I just found out that a total of 55 Oscars are missing! i guess the theif will be the only person to receive so many Oscars at once

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 03-17-2000 04:16 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At least Billy Crystal will be hosting again this year, making it a much classier show than the sleazefest that Ms. Goldberg turned it into last year! Whoopi plain *SUCKED* and was an embarrassment to the entire industry, IMO...


my $.02

Aaron


 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-18-2000 12:45 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aw... no Da---vid---Letterman? Bummer! He was soooooooo good!

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Frandsen
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: Denmark, Europe
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-18-2000 04:32 AM      Profile for Martin Frandsen   Email Martin Frandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like Billy Crystal as the Oscar presenter, but i dont like him as an actor ( city slickers ) but as Oscar presenter no one else does it better, in other words he is born for that role. Any idea which film will take most Oscars? American beauty? or The green mile? others...


 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-18-2000 04:47 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Green Mile hasn't got a chance. If Mr DuBont had utilized a pair of scissors and cut out all the meaningless dribble in it and ended up at a taught 150 min picture, it would win without a doubt.

As it is, however, no way in the wide, wide world will it win. As it says in the last line of the movie..."Sometimes the green mile seems awfully long". I couldn't have said it better myself. I know the academy is famous for giving the nod to longer films, but normally only to longer films which actually keep you awake during the screening.

It's gonna be American Beauty all the way.


 |  IP: Logged

Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-18-2000 09:43 AM      Profile for Michael Barry   Email Michael Barry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Forget the actual nominations! Here's my list:

Best Picture: Election and Magnolia (it's a tie; Sweet and Lowdown isn't here yet )

Best Picture To Have Its Box Office Thunder Stolen By A Lamer Picture Using Similar Concepts: A Stir Of Echoes (Sixth Sense). Runner up: eXistenZ (The Matrix)

Best Mockumentary: Drop Dead Gorgeous

Most Ignored Picture By A Monumental Director: Eyes Wide Shut

Best Foreign Film: The Dreamlife of Angels and Autumn Tale (a bit late, but we got them late.)

Best Writer/Directorial Debut: Boiler Room

Best Feel-Good Movie: Blast From The Past

Best Technical Achievement: Brad Miller (FilmGuard)


 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-18-2000 01:34 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You know I say exitenZ and Stir of Echoes, the matrix, but missed sixth sense... Im sorry but coming from a purely directorial picture here, stir of echoes missed the mark.. had such great potential but never became what it was meant to be.. as for extistenZ... i agree from the story and plotline it is superior to the matrix, however i have to disagree as it bieng a superior film. Matrix had money to spend... the other one didn't... money can erase bad actors and thin story lines... just keep the masses busy with loud music and special effects and they just keep buying popcorn..... slap that fat down billy jack!!!

------------------
"If it's not worth doing, I have allready been there and done it"

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-18-2000 11:45 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Having now seen Denzel Washington's performance as Rubin 'Hurricane' Carter, I'd like to update my original prediction and say Kevin Spacey will win the Best Actor oscar. Denzel is snoozing through most of "Hurricane". I also think it's not the movie it could have been and that fact didn't help him too much either.

...And another thing...
Why, oh why do producers have to employ foreign actors to play Americans (Scottish actor John Hannah gets a go at being an American in The Hurricane). A thick Scottish accent is not capable of being transformed into an American accent. If they hire him for the job, why not leave him with his real accent? I don't think it was that critical to the story that he be American, was it? They took enough poetic licence with the rest of the film, even if the character he plays wasn't REALLY Scottish why not let him be who he is? He just ended up sounding stupid.

On the other hand, if he HAD to be American (or Canadian) why not hire someone from those countries. I'm sure there must be someone out there who could have done the job equally well and we wouldn't be sitting there getting annoyed by this stupid accent.

Phew...that's better.

To recap...

Best Picture: American Beauty
Best Director: Sam Mendes - American Beauty
Best Actor: Kevin Spacey - American Beauty

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.