|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Projector Brands
|
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 04-21-2000 11:25 PM
I received this bit of information after (all of us) started talking about Cinemeccanica. I didn't realize that Cinemeccanica had several different divisions, and (wrongly) sort of lumped them together.----------------- Hi, I read your post on Cinemeccanica's going out of business...I don't think so... Cinemeccanica has several divisions; the production division manufactures dollies (which the patent infringment came from) film editing equipment et cetera. The company is privately held with the 3rd generation planning for digital cinema, whenever it happens. Their projector production is almost at sold out level for the next two years thanks to customers such as Warners International, U.C.I./Paramount and myself (a $6,000,000 distributor). Prevost was in bankruptcy a few years ago due to losing the Zeiss distribution network but the son has brought it back to life. Cinemeccanica wisely did not greatly expand their facilities like Strong did during the American building spree (now dead); that is why Strong is in deep trouble. (and) 2 1/2 years ago Cinemeccanica came up with a new sound drum which fully covers the sound drum (with a slot for the reverse scan LEDs) the center covered area is recessed so as not to touch the image area; designed for mylar stock... I have over 130 units in operation and we are converting 14 more cinemas next month. It is an easy retrofit, and if you have the factory spanner wrench, should take about 1 1/2 hours to install. New item introduced this month - D.C. pulse ignitor for their lamphouses and consoles to replace the IREM AS series units they have been using. Richard Fowler TVP-Miami www.tvpmiami.com ------------------------
I am glad Cinemeccanica is doing OK, because I really like the design. I do wish they still made V9's though. And, I really like the idea of the new sound drum... I'm going to ask our tech guy if we can get one.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ari Nordström
Master Film Handler

Posts: 283
From: Göteborg, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 04-24-2000 12:48 PM
Gordon,I do have some nice AGA pics, so I'll scan them and email them to Brad. That OK with you, Brad? The AGA was the first machine I ever threaded, actually, so I really like them. They're really beautiful, too, very well designed. They were installed pretty much everywhere in Sweden after WWII, but they eventually lost ground to the Philips FP5, Ernemann VIII and others. As for Cinemeccanica, we've nicknamed the Victoria 5 "Cinemeccano" since most of the projectionists around here regard it as something of a toy projector. It certainly feels like one, when used to a Philips DP70 or a Favorit70. On the other hand, when cared for properly, it is not a bad projector, it just feels like one. At the local multiplex, they've had some trouble with misaligned (and wrongly manufactured) gates, resulting in bad focus. Is this anything any of you recognise?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-25-2000 06:56 PM
What's an AGA projector? I've never heard of such a beast.
As it is, Cinemeccanica machines are rara avis in the US. Simplex and Century seem to dominate, with the odd mix of Norelco, Cinemeccanica, Kinoton, and maybe a few others filling in the gaps. For 16mm, Hortson, Norelco, Eastman (model 25), Eiki, and Elmo seem to dominate with respect to theatre-size xenon or arc machines.
| IP: Logged
|
|
David Kilderry
Master Film Handler

Posts: 355
From: Melbourne Australia
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 04-27-2000 03:16 AM
What is used in Australia? Most popular today would be Kinoton FP 50,FP 30 and Cinemeccanica Vic 5. There are also plenty of Christie, Century, Bauer U3, Vic 8, DP70, DP 75, Simplex Strong.Back a few years there were plenty of Super Standards, Cummings and Wilson, (both Australian) Kalee, Centrex, etc. Most automation is Pennywise CA 100 and CA 21. Platters are mostly Speco, Christie, Kinoton. Shakameccanica is the word, they also shed poly film and churn through shutter gearboxes, otherwise good. Kinoton have a great image on screen but the new aperture set-up is fragile and hard to get right. Christie cause major shedding and are easy to work on - they need to be, everything breaks from Ultramittants to damper struts. Clever construction and great lamphouse consols. David
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|