|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: 35mm Mag
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 05-02-2000 08:18 AM
Bryan:Check out the early history of "Scope", which included 4-track magnetic striped prints, on Marty Hart's "American WideScreen Museum" website: http://www.simplecom.net/widefilm/widescreen/wingcs1.htm http://www.simplecom.net/widefilm/widescreen/cinemascoperef.htm The main site entry link is: http://www.simplecom.net/widefilm/ IMHO, Marty's site is one of the most facinating and comprehensive sites about motion picture technology on the web. 
------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oscar Neundorfer
Master Film Handler

Posts: 275
From: Senoia, GA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-02-2000 06:57 PM
Hello to all,I just couldn't stand it any longer, so I finally registered on the Film-Tech forum after reading and enjoying it so very much. There is only so much time in a day, and finding time to read, much less respond, is difficult. I will go out on a limb here and TRY to remember a bit about the SMP435 EQ. As I recall, the original 435 only had 2 eq adjustments, and when Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (I think it was)came out in 70 mag, the eq standards were changed somehow. I don't recall the details. This was back in 1985 I think or somewhere around then. We modified the eq circuits and added a third adjustment. I recall running pink noise film on Teccon 70 mag heads and we were able to get pretty darn good response for Indiana Jones. I don't recall exactly what the response was, but it seems like it was reasonably flat up to 16kHz or so, maybe plus/minus 2 or 3 db. Not perfect by any stretch, but certainly not bad. We had this set up at the Belle Meade theatre in Nashville, and it sounded fantastic. Clean, smooth, and quiet! The old 435's may not have been the best preamps money could buy, but for the price they offered a great value, and we sold a great number of them. Regarding high Z heads, they were not suitable. Thanks for letting me join in here! ------------------ Oscar Neundorfer Chief Engineer SMART Devices, Inc. oscar@smartdev.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 07-11-2000 06:26 PM
35 mag - Gosh, that's some days ago, and the prints were not many at this end of the world. A single print of "Patton" mag/opt got my special attention: the 12Khz tone was hearable in auditorium - not only by me, but in all cinemas, i saw it in. -Anyone know, if that was normal a printing failure on that particular one...?"River Kwai" was here in a 3-track-only mag print (no surround). Was that the normal version, or did it excist in regular 4-track ? -And if, - then why this amputated one ?? -Likewise: Both danish prints of "JCSuperstar" were without surround, -but those 3 remaining tracks sounded damned well. Anyone tryed the Dolby Stereo reissue prints (late 80'es) of this one - were they any good...?? Last new 35 mag prints in Denmark were 1941, Star Wars 1 and Fantasia reissue, but even before those, i guess we were often cheeted, running mono prints only from films, running elsewhere with great sound. -Wasn't the mag sound quite used in US and Britain, even during the seventies...??
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|