|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: No DTS Disks=Bad Movie?
|
Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999
|
posted 05-08-2000 02:11 AM
Jason Said:" but if they took the time to make the strip on the side of the film, why not make the discs?" If the film has a viable DTS timecode and the credits say that it had DTS sound, then there ARE discs available for it! First thing to do is to CALL DTS (NOT the distributor, or you'll get the discs a week after the playdate) Ask for Karen Hultgren, she will do her best to make sure a set of discs get to your theatre expeditiously. Even for some of the more 'off the wall' prints that sometimes pop up with DTS tracks. Aaron
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karen Hultgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 492
From: Agoura Hills, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-12-2000 06:50 PM
Why are not all films released in DTS? We are working on it. Most major (big) studios are using DTS on all films. The few that are not (Fox, Sony, and Paramount) use us for at least 70% of their films. Destination Films has now signed on using us on their films, but I'm not sure of the percentage.The best way to know if a film will be released in DTS, is to check it out on our web site at www.dstonline.com under 'cinema'. As far as some films having a timecode track but no discs, those are usually lab mistakes. Having the track but not getting discs only means you cannot play it in DTS. But you can play it in other sound foramts without causing any problems in playback. Karen at DTS Karen at DTS
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 05-15-2000 06:53 AM
Karen --- Since the DTS time code is on the sound negative supplied to the lab, it's not up to the lab as to whether prints have DTS time code or not. The presence of time code without disks is not a "lab mistake". I suspect that if prints have DTS time code without disks, the time code is there for another language version, or the distributor decided late in the game not to supply DTS disks.------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Eastman Kodak Company Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419 Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
Karen Hultgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 492
From: Agoura Hills, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-15-2000 03:01 PM
Yes, there have been times, although not often when whomever at whatever lab has forgotten to turn off the timecode generator when starting to add the optical soundtrack to a new film. This can happen if the film just before it had DTS.To be fair, yes, there have been times when timecode has been added to a print for DTS digital release in a foreign venue and, for whatever reason, all prints were made w/a timecode track. That, too, doesn't happen often. Karen at DTS
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001
|
posted 07-05-2002 05:42 PM
Bumping this up for our newbies with the 2 latest examples:Has DTS timecode but no discs -- Hey Arnold! SRD/SR/SDDS only -- Sunshine State BTW, the stack ads and one-sheet for Sunshine State have the Dolby Digital logo but not the SDDS logo. 
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-06-2002 04:24 PM
Judging whether a film is good or bad when it has no DTS discs really depends on the distributor and its release habits. I think Paramount's "Hey Arnold: The Movie" has Dolby Digital as the only digital audio track on the print. Normally Paramount includes both DTS and Dolby Digital on any major release. I don't know if the movie is any good or not, but usually whenever Paramount does a Dolby Digital-only print release the sound mix itself is usually very conservative. If the soundtrack really thumps and has a lot of surround activity Paramount will typically support both formats."Shadow of the Vampire" and "Memento" are both arguably art house films. It is kind of curious how both films omitted the use of DTS in the release prints, but both have DVDs that feature DTS audio tracks (the new 2-disc SE of "Memento" features a new DTS mix). Several years ago there were many more films featuring only one of the three sound formats on the print. So back then a film like "The Fugitive," "The Lion King" or "Crimson Tide" could feature a Dolby Digital-only print containing a pretty aggressive surround track. I don't think that's the case anymore. Usually if a lot of work goes into the digital mix, a quad format print will be made these days. But one thing I can't figure out: quad format on Woody Allen films. Yeah, I like hearing DTS in mono. Hehe.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 07-07-2002 02:11 AM
One thing I think happens with the cases of time code being on the print but no discs being made is that perhaps the film doesn't do well on test screenings.If a movie tests well, a distributor may spend more money to hype it up in the marketing. If not, they'll immediately find ways to cut the costs. "Hey Arnold: The Movie" is just the latest film to have time code on the print but no discs made. I remember being mystified when Fox released "The Edge" years ago, featuring DTS time code on the print but no DTS discs being made for the feature. Anyway, "Hey Arnold" isn't exactly drawing in the crowds. I got in a pretty interesting discussion about the duality of movie audiences and some of their bitch-rants regarding "there aren't enough films that are family oriented!" Well, IT IS THE AUDIENCES FAULT!!!! Geez. It is typical American behavior. Pawn something that is your own damned fault onto some other monolithical object, thing, group or whatever. The good theater in my town has family films out the wazoo booked, such as "Powerpuff Girls," "Like Mike," "Lilo and Stitch" and the aforementioned "Hey Arnold". The audiences aren't showing up to support these films. The movie going public cannot have it both ways. They cannot bitch and whine about there not being enough family films when the only films they pay to see have blood flowing, bombs exploding and bare boobs bouncing all over the place! Hypocrites! Anyway, that's why Paramound did not pay to have DTS discs made for "Hey Arnold: The Movie." They pretty much figured the movie would only do marginally well at best. If Arnold picked up an M-60 SAW rifle and started mowing down buildings and earn a PG-13 or R rating, the DTS discs might have gotten made.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|