|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Foolish workload mathematics (aka: Guttag vs. Miller at the 30 plex)
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-14-2000 03:30 PM
Oh Steve, you wacky guy. Here we go again:You are making this specific argument: "changeovers vs. platters". Am I correct? That is your argument, right? Well my friend, if you want to make a generalization on that premise then you most certainly can NOT bring in a Kinotone or other rewinding through the projector machine! Nowhere in the repeated debates did you say "self rewinding projectors on reels vs. platters"! Got it? Good, because not very many theaters out there have that equipment. YOU LOSE THERE! YES, I have run many a show reel to reel with changeovers. Yes, the takeup reel can come from the upper arm, but not always. Many theaters (ones I've worked in actually) have various different sized reels and you can't just simply stick a 22" reel and expect it to take up a 26" reels worth of film! In many cases I had to specifically calculate out how things would work so I had enough "takeup room" on a spare reel. I realize that is probably not the case in your booth, nor would be in your fantasy booth with Kinotons, but that does happen out in the regular world and should not be dismissed as a time waster. Regardless, I can still outthread you in speed on "workload time" if we were side by side and I started rethreading the platter while you took the full takeup reel off, mounted the next reel and got it threaded. (This is assuming we can both thread projectors at roughly the same speed without errors.) How about those damned bent reels? Every theater has at least one. Try taking up a show on a reel that has a slight bend to the flange and watch it dump and mangle the print! Oops, you lost again! Oh, but I haven't even touched on the constant possibility of belt breaks! Yet again, a mangled mess of film all over the floor. Another punch straight in Steve's face and he goes down again! By the way, I would think it would be YOU who would need the Bounty paper towels to keep the damned leader off of the floor. The leader NEVER touches the floor when I thread. Not a single frame. I'll bet yours does. On out of order, YES you may use 2 reels, BUT that possibility of presenting a show in the "wrong order" CAN STILL HAPPEN! Stop saying it can't. That is a lie. Torque reels? Large hubs? Steve, again this argument is "platters vs. reels". Why must you have all of these handicapps just to run reels without problems? The typical changeover booth will have 24" reels (floating or non) with a standard 4" core. Never have I seen a changeover booth with torque motors. Now I'm not saying they don't exist, but they are NOT commonplace. You must run your shows with brute force pull, a typical belt takeup and with 4" cores, otherwise you are admitting defeat right now. If our ref were not on his lunch break, I believe he would agree the most common projector is something along the lines of a Simplex or Century and anything larger than a 26" reel is VERY rare in the typical theater, as well as torque motors. Stop wasting my time stretching for such items and please stick to the basic argument at hand. Film cleaners. Let's tackle this head to head one day. You can use your sticky rollers or brushes 10,000 times per performance and it will still be a solid victory for me. Your question on the pivotal year for the platter is senseless. That has no bearing on these discussions. I presume you're trying to force me into a corner with some lame pre-planned comeback like "well reels have been in use since the beginning of film, de, de, de". You're stretching again, Steve. Here's one you will never understand...changing trailers! I can beat you at this game on actual time taken and I'm willing to bet you money you will sit there and say "but how can that be? I just don't understand!"  Since you seem to want to get into handicaps, let's say we both fall down the stairs and break one of our arms and it is in a cast and sling. I can keep operating on platters, can you with large reels?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-14-2000 10:43 PM
Helloooooo!!!!!??Why are we having this argument? Last time I checked, both of you guys (Steve & Brad) were equipment "SUPPLIERS". <grin> Ever heard of the Eprad Sword? I used to run one just because I thought it was neat to watch! Um, I was only dealing with a single screen at the time. I will address both sides here. Steve, your argument reflects a degree of professionalism and pride that is often lacking in this industry today. You desire to have a hands on presense to insure that the film is projected to the audience in the best manner possible. Brad, you are seeking the same end result while projecting to 30 seperate audiences. Platters are a simple economic necessity in today's world. Platters can scratch. I realise this.(yeah right) Platters don't scratch film! People scratch film! With proper training and professionalism, we can rule out the scratch argument. I'm not taking sides here, but who would benefit the most by selling double the amount of projectors, lamphouses and rewinds to each theatre it serviced? The increased ticket cost would most certainly NOT make the customer any happier. As for spending the night in bins, would the film be any less happy sleeping under a nice, soft, static free cover? Every part of the print (except for the leader) will be untouched by human hands for the duration of the run. What? Your techs wear gloves!? Ummmm Hmmmmm..... Sneak in some night when they don't expect you. Film is incredibly fragile. It gets worse every time you touch it (gloves or not). I vote we don't touch it! Don't take this the wrong way. It takes a skilled operator to show a movie. Frame, focus, optical sound alignment and digital knowledge are a must! But, the best operator in the world still has greasy, oily fingers!! The less he has to "touch" the media, the better. Steve, it's okay!! We still think you are the best!! We (the general public) just don't want to rewind film. (OKAY! I'm lazy!) 1. Reels always in order. 2. Film touched only at make-up. 3. Nasty, filthy film cans removed from the projection area. 4. Quicker operator response to breakdowns without disrupting the rest of the theatre's show schedules. ...What if something plays into the floor when there are 11 change-overs to be made in the next ten minutes? Nope, there's just no beating a good Alpha Platter used with a Component Engineering SA-10 watching for film motion and presence. The war's over!! Live a little! Russ
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Ethan Harper
E-dawggg!!!

Posts: 325
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 05-16-2000 09:59 PM
i agree with brad on that last one. who wants to pay twice the money for at least a minimum of two proj. istead of just one. god forbid you are not counting how many reels do you plan on buying? i use a total of a about 6 6k reels and these are only used when movies come in all tails up. henceforth less used better con. if you wanted to buy 2 6k for 30 proj. hmmmmm thats that is 60 reels. ten times as much as what i own.two i use to work for cinemark tinseltown twenty. I know the types of people they hire to run a booth. lets take a thur for instance.(changeover nights) one time a person i knew had two mispliced trailers and three backwards. easy fix. pull out trailers and replace. trailer changes are also more convenient seeing as that they occur more often in a thirty plex because you simply have more theaters to chang. what are you going to do? rewind each 6k till you hit trailers then rewind to trailer that is to be removed then change it? i can change a trailer in 2min. next lets look at moving prints. this too will occur more often in a 30-plex including screenings. changeovers. theater percentages, etc. I just put on a couple of clamps pick up the print and go on my happy little way. it seems to me that it would be more of a hassle to move two seperate 6k reels to another proj.(more trips involved here) god forbid yo are moving them from one wing to completely the other side of the theater. like i said earlier i know the types of people that are tolerated to be in the booth. like bradd said earlier, once it is on the platter it is there. and will run through the right order each time. most people are smart enough to start the wrong proj. especially on a day that you are just plain thinking bacwards. or i have also seen enough times of people deciding to thread soundline backwards how easy is it to change once it is going?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-17-2000 12:09 AM
Quote:"Of course, anyone who installs a changeover booth in a 30 plex would be a complete moron." Two Questions:
1) How many screens of changeovers have you ACTUALLY run by yourself at one time? I could imagine myself running two screens at a time if I hustle. Of course, there are pros out there who could probably do that in their sleep. 2) Don't you think that even in the most modern googolplex there should be at least one house with changeover capability? There could be a platter there for "normal" showings but I think places like Cinemark would show a lot more independant or art films if they didn't have to worry about building up and breaking down for a one-off show.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-17-2000 07:07 AM
Ethan - when was the last time that you ran a large-reel setup? Trailer changes are easy and much faster than with platters; you do it during the normal rewind process. If you have a decent rewind bench, changing one trailer should take far less than two minutes--and you can do this while the second half of the show is running.
As for whether large reels actually save makeup/breakdown time when compared with platters--they certainly have the potential to do this, since half of the film can be broken down while the second half runs; same for makeup--it's easy to deal with prints that arrive at the last minute, since you can start the first reel and inspect the rest of the print while the first part is running.
That said, I would still agree with Brad's position with respect to a 30-plex. I've never actually seen a 30-plex, but I'd argue that the threadup/rewind time is better spent checking up on other shows, tweaking focus, etc.
I like both systems, but they serve different purposes. A Volkswagon Bug is a good vehicle, as is a Mack truck, but they are useful for different things. I wouldn't want to haul several tons of dirt in a Volkswagon, nor would I want to drive a Mack Truck to work every day.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|