Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Question on terminology

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Question on terminology (Page 2)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Question on terminology

Ari Nordström
Master Film Handler

Posts: 283
From: Göteborg, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 07-19-2000 04:05 PM

Speaking of the CP50, wasn't the omission of the fader because it was at first intended to be installed as an "add-on" in theatres that already had 4-channel mag systems? These theatres already had multi-channel faders and weren't about to get rid of them because of some stupid invention in the much neglected field of optical sound. At least that was what somebody claimed years and years ago...

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.