Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » New TAP Division Suggested For Labs!! (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: New TAP Division Suggested For Labs!!
Dave Cutler
Master Film Handler

Posts: 277
From: Centennial, CO
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-09-2000 02:06 PM      Profile for Dave Cutler   Email Dave Cutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, but I have heard that we can't go to the moon and back anymore. Hard to believe, but I have heard that we have 'forgotten' how to do it.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-09-2000 02:32 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark: Kodak IS already partnering with labs on programs to improve the technology of printing and processing films.

One of them (cyan dye soundtracks) will completely solve the "black splotching on the soundtrack side of the print" that Dave had on his prints of "Space Cowboys". Another has significantly reduced the level of "white dirt" on prints. One is evaluating the spectral purity of additive printers to improve color and contrast. Another development program is aimed at improving the sharpness and steadiness of prints.

Three of the five reels Dave returned had a problem he has not seen before, so it may be an unusual occurrence. Hopefully the lab will share samples of the problem with Kodak so we can analyze the "medium sized white dots running down the right side of the screen". Kodak's assistance in analyzing and solving problems is always available to our lab customers.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-09-2000 02:54 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd say getting a used screener print is THE biggest problem right now. If the depots would make absolute certain that any screener print went BACK to the theater that originally played it, this would no longer be a problem.

Lab defects are all over the place. I believe the biggest problem with this situation is the major pain it is to order a replacement reel. Most people feel it is simply not worth the trouble. I mean really, it is worth changing out that reel of Thomas and the Magic Railroad because the SRD track wanders in and out of the sprocket holes? Nope. Just play it in another format. It'll only be here 2 weeks anyway.

The ratio is indeed far higher than 1%, it's the depots that are making it seem like it is not, as well as having to go on screen the next day without a perfect print in the first place.

Another reason many people don't bother is indeed the lack of Thursday night screenings. By the time a problem is noticed, the studios will say "you caused that". Also, it is a major pain to have to go in and change out reels between shows. It wouldn't be near as big of a deal if the projectionist had all Thursday evening to change out a reel.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-09-2000 04:13 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John,
I'm glad to hear that Kodak is doing all this stuff. But when will we start to see some results? Time IS running out for us as far as film goes. If quality can be put back to the point that a print looks like it was printed at 3 to 400 fpm then you've made great headway. Right now we're all waiting.
The cyan track issue may only create a whole new batch or problems for us all.... Thats not what we really need these days.
Mark


 |  IP: Logged

Greg Pauley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 173
From: Huntington, WV, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-10-2000 10:32 AM      Profile for Greg Pauley   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Pauley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It’s just like me to stir up some trouble and then leave. I’ve been on the road traveling for the last couple of days and just now got online. I agree with some of the other comments above, not every theatre is going to report every problem with every print. The problem with Coyote Ugly that I noted is probably still playing on a screen somewhere in America and the staff is telling the customers “It’s a problem with the print, not ours.” I know that the labs are not perfect just like the rest of us, but I don’t buy the 1% number. Having been in the business for 26 years I have seen times when it was really rare to receive a bad print. You would watch the movie on Thursday night for operator mistakes and for that rare print problem, now you watch for that rare operator problem and no sound on the print, discolor of the print or in the case of Coyote Ugly, disappearing picture and sound. Either my company is the unlucky one receiving the 1% or there are more bad prints coming out of the labs. I don’t think you can search this forum for the number of print problems, not all of us have the time or choose to list every single print problem on this forum. I’m currently driving my Ford Explorer with the Firestone Wilderness tires. When I left two days ago Firestone issued a press release that the problem with the tires were the lack of air pressure by the customer not the tires. Today, Firestone announced a recall of over 6 million of these tires because they have caused over 300 accidents and 50 deaths. Not everything that a big company releases is totally true.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-10-2000 08:56 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are two major labs in Canada Deluxe and AstralTech and both have a very low number of print rejects.
I know Deluxe canada has well under the 1% amount

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-10-2000 09:14 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, if anyone would care to participate, I could start up a dedicated forum just for everyone to post the title of their movie and which reels had damage, whether they were reported or not.

Anyone, anyone? Bueller, Fry?

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Pauley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 173
From: Huntington, WV, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-10-2000 10:14 PM      Profile for Greg Pauley   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Pauley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would be willing to participate, but I don't know it would really prove anything or change anything. It would give everyone a list of problems to check on new prints, just in case someone had to go to the restroom during the screening and missed a problem or for any theatre that doesn't screen the prints prior to showing.

 |  IP: Logged

John Scott
Master Film Handler

Posts: 252
From: Oakdale, MN, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-10-2000 10:55 PM      Profile for John Scott   Email John Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John,

Here are our replacemnts for the summer... 2 reels each in both of our prints of MI2 had to be replaced due to black scratches throughout the print and major color problems (4 reels total)

2 reels of one of our prints of Big Mamma's House had to be replaced because they were in FRENCH!

1 reel of Fantasia 2000 had to be replaced due to white scratches throught the final reel.

3 reels of 1 print of patriot had to be replaced due to soundtrack problems (snaping and cracking and loss of sound sporaticly through the reels).

2 reels of 1 screen of Klumps had to be replaced due to black and white scratches and soundtrack cracking.

2 reels of Space Cowboys due to black splotches randomly appearing on the print.

So far this summer that makes 14 reels we had to return for our 16-plex.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-11-2000 07:11 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad:

The easiest way to keep track of serious problems would be to report them on the "Feature Info & Trailer Attachment" Forum. For example, if everyone was having a sound sync problem with reel 4 of a particular feature film, it would quickly help the lab track and solve the problem. Keeping the information organized by feature title in one place would be useful for all.

My "less than 1%" return figure comes from my contacts in Hollywood. Good to see agreement with what Gordon hears in Canada.

John Scott: You returned 14 defective reels in a period of about three months. Assuming your 16-plex changes out about 1/3 of the prints weekly, you probably received about 30 new reels per week, or a total of 360 reels this summer. So you are returning less than 4 percent of your reels. As mentioned previously in this thread, some theatres may be more tolerant of defects like minor scratches or occasional sound pops, so that may be the reason for the difference in reported returns.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-11-2000 09:03 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Everyone like John's idea? I don't see the need for posting your theater and print number, but a simple "R4 had light base scratches" description would probably do the trick. Again, I think if this were to be implemented for survey purposes that everyone would need to post their problems whether they got a new reel or not.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-11-2000 09:44 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad: Print number and reel number WOULD be very useful for the labs to track and solve a problem. Many times, a film stock, printer or processing problem will be isolated to a small batch of reels done during a particular work shift or on a particular piece of equipment.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Cutler
Master Film Handler

Posts: 277
From: Centennial, CO
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-11-2000 04:10 PM      Profile for Dave Cutler   Email Dave Cutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like a good idea to me. I agree with John P to put it in the "Feature Info & Trailer Attachment" Forum. Print number, Reel number and problem would be the appropriate information. Maybe a note on if you decided to replace it or not would be nice too.

 |  IP: Logged

Ted Costas
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 119
From: Hollywood, CA, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-11-2000 05:00 PM      Profile for Ted Costas   Email Ted Costas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seventeen years... That's how long TAP has been in the Lab Quality Assurance business. We don't work on every title, so I can't say we've changed the world, but I can tell you we at TAP do make a difference on the projects we work on. Here are some factors I can tell you all without breaching any confidentiality agreements:

Over the past ten years, TAP has rejected between 7% and 10% of the reels we've reviewed. On a typical project, we review every 50th reel manufactured, that is our minimum sampling ratio, we do review more reels if we find a problem and need to isolate a defect. We have caught many problems over the years... in each case, we immediately contact the lab, have the defect investigated and repaired, and confirm that the defect was actually fixed. All this is reported back to the distributor that hired us for the project. I will say that Coyote Ugly was our last Disney title we worked on, and although we don't see every reel manufactured, when we catch a problem that is repeated, and we did a few times, we stop the presses and get it fixed. The Reel 4 that was mentioned that had a "picture and sound dropout", well, after looking at our report, this was most likely an isolated problem, hopefully on a single reel, because it never turned up in our every 50th reel review statistics. Then again, I have been aware for some time that the labs pre-screen the reels they give us to review... I used to be upset with this, because it skews the statistics in the labs favor. Yet, for the clients' sake, it works out great. When TAP is hired to review a title, the Distributor gets double the Quality Assurance, first the lab looks at the reels (something that doesn't always happen when TAP is not looking over their shoulder) and they catch the glaring problems, then we look at it and catch the problems the lab misses. And even with the lab pre-screening our reels, we still reject 7% to 10% of them.

Not that I want to open up any cans of worms, but of all the titles mentioned in this topic thus far, Coyote Ugly was the only one we at TAP worked on. Warner Bros. has not utilized TAP Lab Services in some time... Sony uses us here and there on their high profile projects... Disney and DreamWorks use us on almost all of their titles. Fox chooses how extensively to use us on each title, but they do use us on virtually every title. TAP did not work on The Perfect Storm, The Patriot, or Space Cowboys, yet we did work on Coyote Ugly, The Kid, X-Men, Gladiator, and Chicken Run. Before I start getting beaten up here, because we cannot guarentee that each and every print will be flawless, let me say that on all those titles, we assisted the lab in putting out a better product. We caught many defects and had them corrected with a very limited amout of prints being affected. Yes, bad reels do slip by us here and there, but the overall difference we make is significant... and our clients that use us appreciate that difference.

John P: Did you get the flowers I sent? (Ha, Ha)

I'd be happy to answer questions on this topic, but try not to beat me up too bad, o'kay? I'm on your side.

THXfully Yours,

Ted Costas
Manager, THX Theatre Alignment Program

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-11-2000 11:09 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
John, I had recommended not making print numbers a mandatory thing purely for those people who would be afraid of getting into some form of trouble with the higher-ups. I agree it would be beneficial, but I think you would see more defective reels listed if print numbers were optional information.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.