Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » What causes a print to be loose or tight? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: What causes a print to be loose or tight?
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-21-2002 06:38 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Guess What?

In this booth, two of the Christie Platters have U shaped legs and this was indeed one of them.

Brad: Can I still tinker with the rewind spring like you were suggesting when I thought this was a unit with V legs?

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.


 |  IP: Logged

Kara J. McVay
Film Handler

Posts: 95
From: Delaware, OH
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-07-2002 09:15 AM      Profile for Kara J. McVay   Author's Homepage   Email Kara J. McVay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought this would be a good place for my question. I have a very loose print of LOTR (I am showing it to my local university, not the public), anyway reels 1-4 all have sprocket perfs on the sound side. When it came to me reels 1-4 were all stuck together because of being shipped loose. I had over 200ft of film on the floor trying to fix this mess, it was just all over the film cans, very dirty:( Needless to say I don't want to ship it back this way. Does anyone know a way to make it wrap tighter when I ship it back? It is still very loose on my platter. The print of "Treasure Planet" is just fine on the same platter. Any help would be great. Thanks in advance,

 |  IP: Logged

Shaun Flichel
Film Handler

Posts: 42
From: Regina, Sask., Canada
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 12-07-2002 09:22 AM      Profile for Shaun Flichel   Email Shaun Flichel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I also have a question reguarding take-up tightness. We are lucky to have to use those stupid switcheroos, it would be alot better if the print was alittle tighter when it comes to moving prints. I just thought of the idea on move nights, maybe to hang some sort of weight off the yo-yo, i believe this would work, but I dont know how many ounces would be ok for this, I guess I will play when I go in tonight.

Shaun

 |  IP: Logged

Shaun Flichel
Film Handler

Posts: 42
From: Regina, Sask., Canada
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 12-07-2002 09:24 AM      Profile for Shaun Flichel   Email Shaun Flichel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BTW Kara, just break it down as usual, and if your still worried about it flying all over the cans, tape the end with a long piece of masking tape to ensure it stays put.

Shaun

 |  IP: Logged

Darren Crimmins
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 130
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 12-07-2002 12:29 PM      Profile for Darren Crimmins   Email Darren Crimmins   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you are only concerned with shipping out the reels that are tight enough, you could do a normal breakdown, then transfer the reels to your rewind bench. You can then set the tension however you wish with the adjustment on the counterweight (probably not the right term) to have the reels properly tightened. I know you can do that on a Kelmar rewind bench, but not sure about others.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-07-2002 02:01 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Taking off onto reels on your makeup table, then rewinding is your best option. Be careful not to cinch the loosely wound roll, trapping abrasive dirt between the slipping convolutions of film, causing cinch marks.

For winding onto cores, I much prefer rewinds that use "pressure wind" or a buildup roller rather than having to tension the film for a tight wind.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Duggan
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 127
From: Albany, NY, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 12-08-2002 03:02 AM      Profile for Andrew Duggan   Author's Homepage   Email Andrew Duggan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had the same problem with my Christie AW3s at my old theater. These were also the V-legged ones. The winds weren't so loose that it caused any major problems, but this was in a mall that had two theaters, an 18plex that ran new prints and a 12plex that showed the 2nd run prints. So every Thursday, we had to move two or three of these spongey prints across an entire mall. I don't reccomend this. [Roll Eyes]
I quit just about the same time that one of the other projectionists dropped "A Walk To Remember" in mid-mall, right in front of Best Buy. I would pay good money to get the 5 hours of security video of him sitting on the floor, in the middle of a mall at 4am, trying to get the print back together again...

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 10-15-2004 09:39 AM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 677 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 10-15-2004 09:39 AM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings all , well I am looking for some answers for a loose print problem. One I have not experienced before.
Yesterday we built the print of "Collateral" it was quite loose on the plate more than normal.

After it was run today I expected it to be tight , it was still quite loose . We are running 12 different films on all platter plates and they are all winding tight except for this one print of Collateral. It has been run on 2 platteres and on different plates and the result is the same. The platters are C/meccanicas . Any ideas ?

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-15-2004 10:10 AM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, Phil.

Need more info.

Was the print NEW?

Was the print from Atlab or some dodgy place O/S?

What is the film stock code?
(just asking that incase our ones start shredding, been happening a lot lately)

Did the print come from a ('Red Carpet' preview) Hoyts cinema?
(that could be your problem RIGHT there)

Have you tried running sound track up?
My guess is that it has slight perf damage. I'd feel the the perfs as it runs to determine.

Bill.

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 10-17-2004 02:24 AM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
thanks Bill,
I know the print was used, The code # 238 3 617 436 103
Kodak 29.2.004p

Print copy # 126

Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-17-2004 06:22 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Slight perf stretching would be my first guess too, followed by a manufacturing fault with the antistatic layer. That would only be likely to affect one reel rather than the whole print, though. Is it especially loose at one place in the roll or evenly loose throughout?

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-17-2004 03:15 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Slight perf stretching would be my first guess too, followed by a manufacturing fault with the antistatic layer.
I agree that stretching or perf damage may cause winding difficulties, but changes in the conductive antistatic backing would likely only affect propensity to "static cling".

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.