 |
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What is a Schneider 'Cinevar'?
|
Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 08-19-2000 09:54 AM
OK, I've got it:The 'Cinevar' is a model number M65 which lists on Scneider's website as a 'Cinelux' converter. They must have used that designation at some point or in this region. So, the backing lens on the cinevar is a 65MM lens for 1.85:1 as I've said but the backing lens on the anamorphic is a 70MM lens. These are in separate turrets, which as we've said is a very strange way of doing things. Therefore, the cinevar must have the function of shortening the focal length of the 65MM prime in order to fill the screen. Why anyone would opt for this combination is still a mystery.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999
|
posted 08-20-2000 03:10 PM
Playing around with numbers here, but they don't seem to add up right...If Michael's theater uses a 70mm lens for scope, I figure the 1.85 lens would have to be something like 45mm. Yet, it's a 65mm? I don't know of any adapter that would change tha focal length that much. I'm assuming that the scope prime lens is 70mm, and there's no magnacom or any kind of enlarging/reducing adapter with it; just the regular anamorphic adapter (I'm using that as my "fixed" reference, since I don't know the size of the screen or the throw.) Have I got some numbers wrong?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 08-30-2000 08:11 AM
David K: It's a Vic 8 with an automatic turret/aperture changer. I'm not sure if the turret is third party but it seems to be a cinemeccanica design, similar to their manual turrets...Tim K: I've put the idea forward, and we're going to try to replace that combo with a prime. You mentioned that somewhere between 37.5 and 42.5 should do it...let's hope they go for it so we can lose those Cinevars... Thanks to everyone for their help again!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|