Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » False newspaper advertisements (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: False newspaper advertisements
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-11-2002 07:10 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like to know which digital format is being used, purely for my own amusement. As a practical matter all I care about is that if they say "All Digital" then it should be digital unless a technical snafu is forcing them to run analog.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-12-2002 12:17 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If anyone remembers the "Ads that Confuse" rants that I wrote in Widescreen Review, those folks would know I get ticked off by inaccurate or even misleading advertising.

I understand mistakes can be made, especially when a distributor tells you that you're going to get a quad format film with DTS discs and then it arrives only in SR --but that's after you've placed your ad and all that good stuff. As bad as some distributors can be, you may not get a certain print until late Thursday night or even Friday morning mere hours before the first show. Forget about being able to double check a proof then. However, those occurences are rare. And I think the film release info so many contribute to this site well in advance of a release certainly helps cure any potential mistakes.

I've seen Miramax's New York stack ads. They suck. Plain and simple. Not only are they leaving out the DTS and SDDS notation in their ads --their theater listing art quality IS TERRIBLE!!! I should drop a note to Roger Dressler at Dolby and have him take a look at the funkafied knock-off attempts Miramax uses on trying to reproduce a Dolby Digital logo. Horrible! Good Lord, Dressler even has an Adobe PDF file providing exact dimensions for all the elements and type in the Dolby Digital logo. There is no excuse to have that logo reproduce in less than perfect condition.

Overall, some places have good stack ads and other places have stack ads that suck. Generally, I like the ads produced in New York and Los Angeles, but there is bad work going on even in those markets.

There's two reasons for this. Disorganization between the ad agency, film distributor and theaters. And low paid amateurs at work schlocking the art together at the last minute. You can identify a well assembled ad when you see it. And the slapped together stuff looks like crap.

In many cases, technical notation has been dropped from most stack ads around the country. Dallas used to be great at listing sound formats. I have some old clippings from the Dallas Morning News Guide showing as such. But now, most of that stuff is gone. With that kind of practice happening, I can only visit theaters where I know exactly what kind of hardware they are using and am able to give the manager a call to see what digital format the show is using.

I can't rely on stack ads very well to tell me what I want to know. And that's a shame because the newspaper stack ads used to be pretty cool --especially back in the day when they had those big 70mm logos running over the theater listings. Oh well, I saved some NY and LA Times ads from the late 1980's and early 1990's. They're cool to check out once in awhile.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Purdy
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 139
From: Seattle, WA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-12-2002 10:53 AM      Profile for Bill Purdy   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Purdy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Back on page one of this thread the statement was made that if the film was recorded (encoded) in Dolby format then you could advertise it thusly. Not so!! Back in about '78 or '79 Dolby and Eprad went to court and Dolby won. It was decided that you had to be playing the film through a Dolby processor in order to advertise it as being presented in Dolby Stereo. Dolby used to be pretty diligent in sending out those letters that Richard Fowler mentioned, but my suspicion is that there are now so many more theatres and they are so crowded with other systems that it just isn't possible to police it any more.

------------------
Bill Purdy
Component Engineering

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-12-2002 11:10 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A certain theater here uses the "Dolby Digital" logo on their marquee for every feature, even though they routinely run DTS and SDDS in addition to SR-D. For whatever reason, even though they have the DTS and SDDS logo-things for the marquee, they choose not to use them.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-12-2002 07:35 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If a theater manager chooses to put audio format icons on his marquee, he should use the correct ones instead of just sticking up a Dolby Digital logo to apply to any DTS, SR*D or SDDS show. It is easy to figure out why a manager might resort to such a lazy practice. First, if you move prints around in a theater featuring mixed equipment you have to change icons every time. Stack ads may use the generic "digital" term in print. But it is harder to stick seven letters saying "digital" on the board rather than just one icon. Even though those excuses might be real, it is still wrong to apply a Dolby Digital logo to a non-SR*D show.

Companies like Wagner/Zip Change and Gemini have marquee icons for all three digital sound formats as well as the Dolby symbol and THX logo. And then fellows like me can design larger customized icons to fit any kind or size of marquee. Anyway, the resources are there in terms of sign supply if a theater manager wants to use the tool correctly.

On the Dolby stack ad advertising thing, it is wrong for any theater to claim "Dolby Stereo" or "Dolby SR" if they don't have the authentic playback equipment for those formats. If the booth rack just has Smart or Ultra Stereo processors, then the ads should just say "Stereo" for their optical analog presentations (and that's presuming the theater even has stereo gear and not mono). I see such practices as being as equally inaccurate as a theater playing a film in Dolby Digital, but claiming DTS presentation instead.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-12-2002 07:42 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Because I have established myself as a pesky movie nerd, I will ask the current manager there why they don't use the correct marquee logo. I know they have them. They've been doing this for a LONG time and through several managers, so it's possible nobody has given it any thought recently.

Is a "stack ad" the circuit's ad? I mean if Regal runs a display ad for 1 or more Regal locations, is that referred to as a stack ad?


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-12-2002 08:06 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A "stack ad" is a for a single movie which lists all of the theaters playing it. The theater listings are "stacked" in columns --well, I think that is how the nickname was coined.

In a small city, a movie may play at only one theater. It can't really be called a stack ad. A lot of managers call them "co-op ads". Obviously, the stack ad in a large city newspaper would be paid for primarily by the film distributor and perhaps with a smaller percentage coming from theaters listed in the ad.

A theater circuit ad, such as Regal, which lists only their theaters and what is playing at those locations is very obviously called a theater directory ad. I think it is funny how a lot of stack ads will not feature technical notes on sound/projection format and then just say "check theater directories for showtimes and stereo sound". Many of the theater directories don't even list the tech info either!

I think some theaters don't list sound format info in their directories in an attempt to hide just how badly equipped their theater might be. I know that's the case with Dickinson Theaters here in Lawton. Their Central Mall 12 theater has never noted sound formats at all. And that's because they have only 2 DTS units, and that would pale in comparison to the Carmike 8's ad which seems to have DTS noted by every show week in and week out with very few exceptions. Even the art films they get now like "Monster's Ball" or "Brotherhood of the Wolf" have DTS.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-12-2002 08:15 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Got it re stack ads. Here in Eugene/Springfield, stack ads never contain any technical data, only location info.

Regal's circuit ads say "Digital Sound in all auditoriums" at the top, and "DIG" next to the name of each feature. Oddly, a legend at the bottom explains "DIG" = Digital Sound, and "STR" = Stereo Sound, but they haven't annotated a film as "STR" for a very long time. (They also claim "Largest screen and auditorium in Eugene/Springfield" which is only half-true. They don't have the largest screen.)

Cinemark 17's ads say "Digital Sound in all auditoriums" and that's all. But Cinemark's Movies 12 $1.50 theater uses the DTS logo on the movies playing there in DTS (3 screens are DTS-capable). And it says "Stereo Surround Sound in all auditoriums" (happens to be pathetically bad Ultra Stereo).


 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-13-2002 02:38 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

I was the one that made the statement about that it was completely legal to say a film is in dolby, and not even present it in such, and still be able to advertise as such.

You did clarify my point, as you stated, you cannot say that it is "Presented" in dolby, dts, whatever, and then it is not. My point was that you can say that a film is "IN" dolby, dts, whatever, and not ever say that it actually "IS NOT" presented in such.

An example would be like this...

YOUR LOCAL INDEPENDANTLY THEATER PRESENTS

1. STAR WARS #1 - Attack of the menace (DTS)
2. Rat Wars - Jar Jar gets shot to death (DOLBY)

and so on.

However if the header reads...

YOUR LOCAL THEATER PRESENTS DTS SOUND

or

YOUR LOCAL THEATER IS RUN BY CORPORATE BUTNICKERS...

AND PRESENTS ALL FEATURES IN DOLBY...

then you must...

The clarification is purely a legal one. The moral thing is of course its wrong to imply, even if you dont atually state. Its like saying you have a ton of money, only to reveal later that it is all confederacy money, or pennies.

So it is completely legal to put that a film has DTS or Dolby, but NOT legal to say you are presenting it in such.

Another trick used is to say "DTS AVAILABLE" in the header, only to discover one of eight has it, and the rest are mono. Also common practice used to "unintentionally" distract the consumer from the truth.

And truth be told, sometimes, I prefer an analog presentation. Sometimes the DTS mix is horrible. And always way to sterile.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Phillip Jackson
Film Handler

Posts: 10
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 03-13-2002 04:30 AM      Profile for Phillip Jackson   Author's Homepage   Email Phillip Jackson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here in New Zealand, well Auckland anyway the cinemas don't care about sound formats, if you ring up and ask what sound format a movie is playing in they have no idea what DTS or Dolby is and hang up on you.

sometimes the website may say "Digital Sound" but who knows which.
they never play the trailers before the movie either, except one cinema that has closed now used the play the DTS flying disc before every movie.



 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 03-25-2002 06:39 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
USA Films has solved this problem to a degree: Beginning with The Man Who Wasn't There, New York-area stack ads for all USA Films releases ID the sound formats but do not assign them to particular theaters. This lets you know the theaters listed will have at least one of those sound formats.

Universal adopted a similar approach for its arthouse titles beginning with Brotherhood of the Wolf.


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-25-2002 06:53 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Charles, are you referring to the digital sound logos that appear up in the movie poster artwork? Or is the advertising agency just sticking Dolby Digital, DTS and SDDS icons down in the corner under the theater listings? If they are doing the latter, I don't see that as a solution.

Most ads in the Dallas Morning News newspaper use a similar motif. You'll see a movie stack ad, several rows of theater listings under the poster artwork and then perhaps a DTS or SDDS logo --with no indication of which theaters are showing what format (or even if a number of theaters are not showing the film with digital sound).

Those logos are not all-encompassing. That's something many theater customers do not understand. They automatically believe any theater they visit is going to be showing the film in the best format available. So many customers will commonly wind up in a theater with no digital sound equipment and not realize it until the show starts --and this is assuming any of these people actually care at all about things like digital surround sound. The ad people out there must be assuming most don't care if the audio is coming out of a ham radio.

I'll tell you one thing that pissed me off when I heard it. One of my friends has an old classmate that started working at the Central Mall theater here in Lawton. Even though the 12 plex has two DTS units and they get discs with just about every print, the people there are too lazy to bother loading the damned things. They also don't have their automation set up right and have to manually switch stereo matrix on out of mono. So most shows play in mono. Now I am glad that theater doesn't advertise which shows are in DTS or even stereo for that matter. They have a state-of-the-art bleacher seating 12 plex in all-mono sound!

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 03-25-2002 07:04 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby: You might have misread my earlier post. That post has been edited to clarify the situation.

USA Films and Universal share the same ad agency for their NYC-area ads. With that format on upmarket/arthouse titles those 2 studios don't pull a Miramax on the public.

(Coincidentally, Universal owns a part interest in USA Films and will soon own all of that imprint.)

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 03-25-2002 07:39 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the advertisements for Century Theaters in Tucson (they have 4 cinemas here) are somewhat misleading. One has to carefully look at their ads to see which of their cinemas have what features. A person doing a quick glance can be misled.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.