Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Citizen Kane (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Citizen Kane
Richard P. May
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 243
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jan 2006


 - posted 05-25-2008 12:01 PM      Profile for Richard P. May   Email Richard P. May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CITIZEN KANE is part of the Turner Entertainment/WB library, and is distributed by WB's Classics office.

DM

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-25-2008 02:09 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The rights to CITIZEN KANE is controlled by Time Warner and is a part of Turner Entertainment library of films and not Criterion. I believe the film was distributed to theatres by RKO Radio Pictures and Time Warner owns most or All of their library of films. Criterion is a DVD distribution company and a division of Janus Films.

I have the deluxe edition of CITIZEN KANE on DVD and the transfer is excellent and so is the mono sound, I first saw this movie in a theatre when I was a little boy when my parents took my brother and sister and I to see it. Because I have always considered it one of my favorite films, I would not mind seeing it again on the big screen someday.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-25-2008 05:01 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wasn't there a mistake awhile ago where someone sold digitally 'cleaned-up' KANE DVD's, but ended up accidently removing the rain from some scenes?

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-25-2008 06:15 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Digital does seem to have that propensity. When IMAX demonstrated the results of a DMR blowup to SMPTE in NY, they screened the conversion of APOLLO 13. Before the film the IMAX tech told us that when the software was "cleaning" the film grain during the conversion, for the shot of the astronaut's glove filled with sand and the sand spilling through the fingers, the software removed the sand. The tech explained that they had to go back and tell the computer to put the sand back in, stupid. It got a big laugh.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 청주시, 경북도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 05-25-2008 06:45 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They had the same kind of thing shown as an extra on a recent Wizard of OZ DVD I had gotten my mom.

Since the different layers of film didn't end up lining up properly (each of the originals had warped at random amounts), they ended up having where the correct general image would come through on transfer but randomly there'd be a spot of, say, red because the magenta layer hadn't been lined up right. So they created an automated way to remove those spots. This worked great at first until they noticed that the ruby slippers were no longer red since the computer assumed that they were so red that it had to be the magenta layer being the bad one.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Theakston
Master Film Handler

Posts: 411
From: New York, USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 05-27-2008 10:17 AM      Profile for Jack Theakston   Email Jack Theakston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Similarly, when Transitfilm in Munich was doing the restoration of METROPOLIS, they were using automated software to clean the image up. They found that whenever something moved fast-- an arm swinging, or a paper being folded up, it all of a sudden disappeared, because the computer was recognizing it as something that was only in the frame for a second and therefore must be a speck to remove.

Needless to say, we've come a long way in eight years, but there are still problems, particularly with studio de-graining the image and then "sharpening" it again with edge enhancement to the point where the image is a smoothed-over, over-enhanced mess.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.