Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby vs DTS....Some food for thought...... (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Dolby vs DTS....Some food for thought......
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-21-2001 05:19 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Per,
If you pay the shipping I'll send you a quart of Filmguard to try out. Keep in mind though that if you don;t haev a KElmar type film cleaner you'll hvae to apply it by hand. This is a bit difficult to do. Let me know what you think.

Personally, I'd get two more DP-70's and send the Cinemec on its way. If you do put digital on the Cinemec then use a Cat 701. When you do send the machine to projector heaven you will still have the intact digital system you can install on the new machine.
We are developing an SRD reader to retrofit onto the DP70 sound reproducer. The main problem is that you have to go to a sound drum in which the film overhangs the edge so you can scan between the perfs. This gets away from the non-contact type of drum which this reproducer is so famous for. We are trying to work this out so we can use the non-contact type but it only leaves a bit more than a millimeter to support the edge of the film. It does work ok and has low error rates but we're concerned about supporting an edge this small. Cinemec also does it this way...with a 1mm edge for the film.
Mark @ GTS


Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-21-2001 05:26 PM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark -

Thanks in plenty - Now sales offer cant be any better, i think. -The Kelmar cleaner - is that the one in the Film Guard photos ?
Will it go for the DP without trouble ?

/p.

Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-21-2001 05:31 PM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wish, I had a scanner. -Then You could see the main reason for not getting DPs for screen 2. -My 250+ pound are almost down on knees to get round the Victoria (without column, -hung onto build-in wooden console.
Otherwise - great idea - especially saying goodbye to the Shakeamec.
-And then: Used DP's never available - over here, at least... -for some reason
/ p.


Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-21-2001 05:33 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It should work on the DP-70 although I have never installed one. Kelmar lists a 70mm projector bracket P/N 7508330 and a 35mm to 70mm adaptor bracket which is P/N 7508315, however they do not specify what 70mm machine it is for. I can find out tommrrow though. The other option is to run the film through a Kelmar cleaner on the rewind bench. We have one customer that does that. They once got in a print of Top Gun that was terrible and practically unusable but after 3 or 4 passes through the Kelmar with Filmguard on the rewind bench the print actually looked decent sans the emulsion scratches. That is what sold me on FilmGuard. Do you have a Kelmar cleaner?
Mark @ GTS

Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-21-2001 05:39 PM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Never tryed other than Kodak PTR cleaner - with absolutely no succes !
As someone once put it here: Particles tranferred from one place on print to another. Demounted after almost ruining a brand new Toy Story (I) print several years ago...

/p.

Karen Hultgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 492
From: Agoura Hills, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 02-21-2001 05:52 PM      Profile for Karen Hultgren   Author's Homepage   Email Karen Hultgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe the article is concerning DTS for CDs and DVDs. It's not about DTS discs for motion pictures on film.

Karen at DTS

Karen Hultgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 492
From: Agoura Hills, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 02-21-2001 06:04 PM      Profile for Karen Hultgren   Author's Homepage   Email Karen Hultgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For clairification, the codec used for DTS on CDs and DVDS is NOT the same as used on DTS discs for motion pictures on film. The compression rate for the "home" codec is 3:1, the compression rate for the "cinema" codec is 4:1.

It seems to me the article is confusing more people than informing anyone. It should have been made more clear that they were comparing home product and not professional cinema (movie theater) product.

This whole "who sounds better" debate of DTS vs DD for DVDs/Cds/laser discs has been going on for years. It's not my area of expertise (home applications), so I leave it to the "other" side of DTS to handle.

Karen at DTS

Karen Hultgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 492
From: Agoura Hills, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 02-21-2001 06:05 PM      Profile for Karen Hultgren   Author's Homepage   Email Karen Hultgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One last time....

The reason they did not consider SDDS is that there is no SDDS for home systems.

Karen at DTS

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 02-23-2001 01:47 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The tests took place at a university theater with both Dolby SR*D and DTS equipment. The testers evaluated motion picture film sequences.

It was not a home theater or CD/DVD evaluation.

Stefan Scholz
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 223
From: Schoenberg, Germany
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 02-23-2001 02:33 PM      Profile for Stefan Scholz   Author's Homepage   Email Stefan Scholz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I readthrough thearticle, when the magazine was in the mail, about two month ago. It deliveres some interesting points for discussion, and reveals a subjective test with an audiénce in a´given theatrical environment, whivch not considered the best, or reference site. Within this the results were archieved, bút I have not read through it, that people have preferred DD to DTS in general. It is worth reading through everything before continuing the discussion.

Ari Nordström
Master Film Handler

Posts: 283
From: Göteborg, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-23-2001 02:35 PM      Profile for Ari Nordström   Email Ari Nordström   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, with all due respect to those concerned, I much prefer SRD to DTS. It sounds better (IMHO, of course), and it's available without having to call the ditribution company for discs. If they have them.

At the Göteborg Film Festival three weeks ago, I screened 66 35mm prints (and one 70mm print) from all over the world. Of these, about half had SRD tracks. Exactly _one_ print came with DTD discs even though about nine or ten had the time code track. Thankfully, most, if not all, of them had an SRD track, too. Please note that these prints were shipped directly to us from various film festivals, labs, or special screenings. Also note that most of our screenings were the first European or Swedish screenings of the films in question. We had a few world premieres as well.

So what became of those DTS discs? Is it our responsibility to see to it that the film is actually delivered with the digital sound track?

I rest my case.

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-23-2001 05:10 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Karen,
It was indeed a Motion Picture sequence evaluation. It has been a while since I read the original article myself. Yes, He mistakenly said that DTS was lossless implying that there was no comperssion, bu this is not the case. I e-mailed him and let him know about that and I did gt a reply fomr him that he was not aware about the system used in DTS. Compresssion aside though it was a simple sequence evaluation.

I think you may have picked up some of the stuff mentioned about video compression for Digital Cinema / TV that he mentioned in the posting and assumed that it was home video they were talking about.
Best,
Mark @ GTS


Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-24-2001 05:49 PM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ari tells about missing DTS discs.
It has and sure always will be a problem, because to few employees at the distribution offices appreciate the added quality, but only gives thoughts to their extra work, delivering not only film print but discs.
Often, some danish bookers have given us the message, when complaining, that if a cinema has installed both DTS and SRD, they see no reason, sending us the discs - we can run digital whatsoever...! (It goes better now than 5 years ago, though !)
Luckily, Karen and her collegues in DTS' former Brussels office and nowaday their English department, don't shy the trouble, but has been helping me several times with discs coming across the sea, so that the best possible presentation can be done. -Just as their patience was far beoynd what you could expect about all my questions during a period some years ago with very poor dealer/service possibilities local in Denmark.
That was great service to a small custumer, and the #1 reason, i ever considered to go digital on my humble 39 seat screen 2.
Thanks again !

Per

P.S.: Only DTS disappointment: trailer discs not available i Denmark, except a single go back at the start of DTS....

P.P.S.: About that photo of Yours, Ari - Are You keeping birds in the booth in Göteborg ? -Can't help thinking back on Hrundi v. Bakshi and his "birdy-num-num"...


Ari Nordström
Master Film Handler

Posts: 283
From: Göteborg, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-25-2001 01:06 PM      Profile for Ari Nordström   Email Ari Nordström   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, Per, about that photo...

No, it isn't a booth pic. It was taken in Vancouver, of all places, three years ago, and it's one of the few decent pics I could think of when Brad came up with this portrait thing. I'm as handsome as ever, of course, but people keep failing miserably when pointing their cameras at me.

Heyward Garner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 101
From: Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 02-26-2001 12:10 AM      Profile for Heyward Garner   Email Heyward Garner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ahhhhh...
This debate is like taking both Coke and Pepsi into an uncivilized culture and asking them which one is better?
The "average" (by that I mean 99% of moviegoing patrons) CAN NOT distinguish a difference, nor even know what unit is running in what auditorium... Just so long as it's digital.
I must say, that I think of myself as having a rather keen ear. I played piano for several years, have been playing guitar for two years now, and have worked various a/v tech jobs aside from running my booth. I have noticed that DTS dialouge (high end) noise seems more crisp. Dolby managed to sneak in their old-school "noise-reduction" into SRD, which muffles the higher end frequencies so as to rid the sound of that famous hiss. DTS does not do so, making things like dialouge or a symphony orchestra sound really *REALLY* good. However, the special effects I have to give props to Dolby. Everything other than the center channel sounds GREAT. Extranneous noises such as a car blowing up shake the seats, instead of a crisp clean fire burning like DTS would produce. Nothing wrong with either, I like both. Those are the main differences I've noted...
Also, DTS is compressed if I am not sadly mistaken. It's just not compressed nearly as much as dolby, because DTS has more room for the data, plain and simple. Dolby has a good idea though, fitting everything onto the film. Less to mess with. That's all they were trying to accomplish. In doing so they sacrificed *some* quality, but nothing a consumer would ever be able to tell. We are supposed to know and detect the difference, that's our job. Not theirs... =)



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.