Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Message to Projectionists, etc re Moulin Rouge (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Message to Projectionists, etc re Moulin Rouge
Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 06-02-2001 02:04 PM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our print didn't have the problem Brad mentioned, the audience murmur didn't start until after the trailer.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-02-2001 03:54 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
In light of John and Gordon's last comments, then someone at Fox needs to wake up or be terminated. I see this on most Fox prints. Also, if Fox would print frame lines at the start of their logo, most theaters wouldn't make the cut right on that first visible frame of picture which is way too late to get the opening drums on the Fox fanfare.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 06-02-2001 06:14 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad is so right on this... cutting off the Fox fanfare is a major peeve that I just can't get people to watch for... They can't see the framelines to cut it at a good place, so just cut at the first place they can see them.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Dougherty
Film Handler

Posts: 36
From: Maspeth, NY, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-04-2001 12:28 AM      Profile for Peter Dougherty   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Dougherty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Our average age is 24. We all check the start-up of each film, and the start of every feature including focus, framing, fuzzy edges, misframes etc, etc.

If that is the only time you check, you're doing your audiences a huge disservice. I firmly believe in checking focus, frame, sound and film path at least once every half hour in every auditorium. I alo believe in standing by machines while trailers are running to ensure flat-to-scope conversions and sound formats are executed properly.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Elzie
Film Handler

Posts: 17
From: Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 06-04-2001 04:46 AM      Profile for Matt Elzie   Email Matt Elzie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is weird: apparently the MR print we received was actually missing part of the end of the feature. I was told that, during the finale, the film cut abruptly (and in mid-sentence, no less) to the closing credits. This was not a projectionist error during make-up, either. The situation was eventually remidied when we were sent a replacement for reel 8, the reel on which the error occured. However, since I wasn't there, I may not have all of the correct information. Still, I would like to know if this has happened to anyone else. I'll post again as soon as I know exactly what happened.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-04-2001 06:26 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With attached previews, it may be that the distributor doesn't want anyone cutting off the preview or having a gap between the preview and feature, so they leave minimal black and they overlap the sound. It's not usually the lab that makes that decision, so don't blame them.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-04-2001 12:42 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Right, but the studio ordering such a thing is completely stupid because most theaters REQUIRE the cutting of the attached logo so their policy trailer can be inserted. It just damages the beginning of the studio logo and looks bad. Overlapping the audio does absolutely nothing to stop people from making a cut there.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-04-2001 01:43 PM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regarding Moulin Rouge.

The trailer Planet Of The Apes, should
not be removed.
It was printed in there for a reason.
(This is called hardlocked - for A REASON)
Your 'policy' tag should be inserted 3 feet
or less after you see the number 3 on the leader of reel 1.

How some people are mentioning the first few BUMP-BUMP of the Fox fanfare are being cut off, due to no frame lines is beyond belief to me. Ever heard of a frame counter?

However, I know FOX cut short the fanfare
when it is clearly a crap movie.
(The Abyss and Aliens get excused)

At least look at the analouge sound track, the cut foot back towards the leader, taking into account that you dont include the Number 3 'beep'

Bill.

Soon instuctions for every movie will be sent
from the director and studio if simple things
like this are not understood.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-04-2001 02:08 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

Geez, give people a little bit of credit, will ya? I know what I am doing and there are plenty more people here that do as well. Every single possible frame of black was saved. The cut was done on the last frame of the attached trailer. The problem here is that Fox is OVERLAPPING the audio into the end of the trailer. This is NOT a projectionist fault.

Also, apparently you did not read my post above thouroughly. Do you remember this line?

"most theaters REQUIRE the cutting of the attached logo so their policy trailer can be inserted."

Yes, theaters REQUIRE the placement of the policy immediately before the feature starts. I am not going to break a theater's policy simply because someone seems to think that overlapping the audio will force everyone to not cut it. The trailer still plays before the feature. Fox should not have a problem with it provided the trailer DOES play.


 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 06-04-2001 04:50 PM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Are there different negatives of Moulin being used? Some people mention the attached trailer being tape spliced on, other mention overlapping audio. Our print had none of that, the audio DID NOT overlap (verified by both listening to it and looking at the analog soundtrack at the start of the black).

John? Anyone?

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-05-2001 05:14 AM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree that the policy tag should the last
thing you see before the feature, as it has the foils to bring the house lights down and do the lens change, and lets eveyone the know main show is about to begin.

However it becomes a difficult for us as our new tag only comes in Widescreen. No matter what we say they won't make a c/s version.
(And I'll bet it's because of the cost)

So we have to put it after the last w/s trailer and before the hardlocked c/s trl.

With the over lapping sound track, I'll have
check that out. If its true, you've got to wonder why they have done that. I don't know.

Bill.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-05-2001 06:12 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh, now that sucks! I know Cinemark always used to have a "dual format" policy trailer. Since it was animated, it actually did look somewhat decent in either format, except that the later ones ended up having hard matte lines at 1.85 that sometimes wandered (and of course had hairs in the printed gate).

Are your flat-only policies animated, graphics or live action? How do they look when ran through an anamorphic?

I'm betting there are at least 3 internegatives of Moulin Rogue all cut/splied differently from the comments here thus far.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-05-2001 06:49 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad said: "I'm betting there are at least 3 internegatives of Moulin Rogue all cut/splied differently from the comments here thus far."

It wouldn't be surprising, as the comments include prints outside the USA. Perhaps the limited pre-release in selected cities was slightly different too.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-06-2001 08:26 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill

I thought they were all scope tags.

Thems peeples is crazy.

If they only come in w/s and they insist you run it, then I wouldn't be running the scope trailer. There is nothing in the film's rental contract that says you MUST run the attached trailer. Besides, Apes isn't until August and there's plenty of titles coming out before that one.

John.


 |  IP: Logged

Tao Yue
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 209
From: Princeton, NJ
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-06-2001 10:17 AM      Profile for Tao Yue   Author's Homepage   Email Tao Yue   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill,

What did you mean when you stated that Fox cut off the fanfare for _Aliens_ and _The Abyss_? What was missing -- part of the opening drums or the Cinemascope Extension?

Until recently, flat films never had the extended Fox fanfare. The Cinemascope Extension was composed by Alfred Newman specifically to promote Cinemascope films. _Aliens_ is flat and so the shorter original fanfare is expected. In fact, in the seventies and eighties, even anamorphic Fox films, like _Alien_, sometimes used the shorter fanfare.

I suppose it's due to the influence of _Star Wars_, which made the extended fanfare so well-known, that Fox began putting it in all its movies. An example is _Quills_ from Fox Searchlight, which was shot flat, but opened with the Cinemascope Extension to the fanfare.

On a related note, isn't the 50th anniversary of Cinemascope coming up soon? Considering how much of a milestone it was, Fox should do something, perhaps revive the "A Cinemascope Production" tag which goes after the searchlight logo. Go to Martin Hart's http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/ if you've never seen the tag.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.