|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Oops! i guess we dropped the print
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-28-2001 07:06 PM
I received this e-mail from a local theatre's employee last night. I thought it was a bit off the wall, especially since it was from so long ago. So I thought I'd post BOTH sides of the story here and let you guys and gals decide how A theatres management should handle this sort of case. Note: In the original posts that I did not mention any names either. I will let the employee of this chain reveal who he and the chain are himself..... The reply from the fired employee was received today in my e-mail. I had foreworded Sean's mail to him after reading it last night. I thought it fair that both sides of the story be known from each operators perspective...Geez, I feel like Rush Limbaugh here! Mark Gulbrandsen SLC, UT Last Night's e-mail.....
Dear Mr. Gulbrandsen, I am a member of the booth management here at Jordan Commons Megaplex 17. I have read your posting in the forum regarding the "Ben-Hur" incident. I will have you know that you have been misinformed about this whole thing. First of all, Kelsey was already under fire with us before this occured. He was suspect of scratching several prints (oddly enough, after firing him, the print scratching stopped). He also cut up leader tapes??!! Now, down to the incident. I had myself AND yet one MORE projectionist in addition to Kelsey himself. He never tried to call for assistance. He ends up dropping it 20 minutes before showtime, and calls no one to inform them, instead choosing to make an attempt to cover it all up. Of course, this 16 reel monster is a disaster that would (and did) take hours of cleanup and repair. Meanwhile, the projectionist on the other end of the building responsibly realizes that showtime for Ben Hur was approaching fast. Wondering why Kelsey had not yet called, he went down to offer assistance with the print movement. He opens the door, and BAAM!!! What a sight to see! Platter covers all over the print spread nastily all over the booth floor. This is when I was called to attention, and I, Yes I, had to spend hours of MY time to repair the problems cause by HIS stupidity. So....... Please dont trash anyone publicly on film tech when you dont have both sides of the story. Thank You! The Fired Employees response.... What topic is he referring to on film-tech? I haven't been reading it for the past 2 weeks or so. I think that it is easy to place blame for a lot of problems on the person who gets the boot after they are gone. You terminate one person, and it gives everyone else a wake up call by setting an example of them. scratches - there were movies that were scratched prior to my employment there, in particular a print of Toy Story 2 was in terrible shape. There are 2 instances that I know of that I mis-threaded the failsafes, and possibly scratched the prints, on one of them I had the opportunity to watch it for a short time and didn't notice any scratches at that point. the other incident I did not see myself but was informed of by Paul that it happened and he had fixed it already. I did not get to see the print after that incident either. as I recall, everyone there during my last week had one-on-one time with paul for a shift to make sure that everyone was threading correctly, as the scratched prints had not been linked to just any one projectionist's shift. As I said before the print of Toy Story was scratched prior to my employment. cutting up leaders - I did not make up or tear down any prints. During my employment at the Reel theater in Magna I made up threading leaders which involved using outdated unused trailers and a 2' section of leader at the startup point to thread in frame with, that envolved cutting leaders. but as for this practice at Jordan Commons, I do not specifically recall doing this, however I did not have any reason to as I was not envolved with print make up. The Ben Hur incident. Sunday December 26, 1999. I am going to just explain this, and I am not trying to put any blame on anyone other than myself. I am trying to explain the circumstances. My shift that day was from open until 7 or 8pm. I got my schedule for the screens that I would be in charge of that day and started on it. shortly after 1 the print of pokemon was supposed to be moved from the platter that ben hur was going to be played on later to another screen. I moved that print alone without any need for assistance. However, I had never moved prints on platters before and realize now that even moving a 5 reel movie like Pokemon I should have asked for assistance. Having read Brad's then recent page on how to move very large prints such as the Green Mile easily, I felt confident that I could move ben hur as well. the platter that Ben Hur was made up on was running Sleepy Hollow at the time and was only a 30, maybe 50 foot sitance between platters (projectors were back to back) when the time came that I had time to move it, I started doing so, and made it all but the last 5-10 feet before any problems started. the print started funneling and I laid it down on the floor at that point. I want to make this clear that I did not try to cover it up, and that I immediately called Sean (if I recall correctly, I believe that it was Sean working the north end booths) on the radio for help. I wanted to start trying to put it back together immediately, but Sean wanted to wait for Paul to get there and have him decide what to do. Myself, Sean, Paul and someone else who I don't remember put the print back together in 2 hours. (2 hours working on it. I believe it took around 45 minutes before Paul showed up) During the time that we were putting Ben Hur back together I had other shows scheduled to start. being a nervous wreck at that point I did not pay the attention that was necessary and apparently started the print of Galaxy Quest mis-threaded. This is the incident that I do not have personal confirmation on, I was just told about it by Paul after he fixed it. I was not given the chance to see what I had done, I was just told to go home until I had been contacted by Paul or Dick Cornell. It was a very bad day-after-Christmas. Take it as you wish, but that's the full truth to the best of my knowledge. Now you have both sides of the story. Kelsey
| IP: Logged
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 09-28-2001 08:29 PM
Tuck - Schmuk! Use the recommended devices. I have seen this stupid "Tuck" thing snag some convolutions near the end of of the show. There is lots of ways you can prevent your print from winding up on the floor.  Paul
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 09-28-2001 11:32 PM
Brad, the big "Hoola Hoop" I made that someone stole defintely kept prints from throwing - even on a waxed platter. (Ikk!) There are stickum devices that can be purchased through theater supply dealers. They do work very well to keep the tail from throwing, but they should be taller. A gust of wind from an A/C vent, power supply blower, or a gassy operator could dislodge the last convolution. If the platter timing and P/O heads are not too far out of kilter, they will usually keep the convolutions concentric. I have used preview rolls taped "inside-out" with masking tape to keep prints from throwing on the CFS platters, Potts Platters, Strong Platters and other platters as well. When I ran Shindler's List on a Strong platter, I was able to mount the entire print on one platter disk. The final convolution was about 1 inch from the platter edge, and I used a bunch of inside-out masking taped preview cores to keep the print on the platter. Even a "Tuck" would not have worked. I have also seen some Christie platters go ape shit and toss the print on the floor. Just recently, I had a Strong platter go so damn goofy that I had to use a bunch of 1 inch plastic boxes to keep the print from shifting. Once those prints shift, well, it is a disaster waiting and looking for a place to happen. In Mindrot, North Dakota, (City name from the complements of a friend of mine on FT who lives in North Dakota) an AW3 went completely horse shit because someone left a screw out of a light module. When the roof hatch was open, and the sunlight hit the platter just right, the platter "took off". A hoola hoop would have saved the day several times for that projectionist. NO tuck would have stopped that one..  In Milwaukee, Wisconsin, an AW2 went completely snake shit and became so spuratic in operation that the platter was in danger of throwing the print. Nobody could fix it. Just turned out there was a bad circuit breaker in the power panel that was allowing intermittant power to the platter. That was a rollercoaster ride for the film. But the best one is the hoola hoop. There is no way in hell a platter will toss a print on the floor, even if the motor racked "full on" to 180RPM or better unless the inertia of the off-balance print was strong enough to tip the platter over.  Also, I have had some platters puke in the middle of the show where I had to use the MUT to power up a run-away pay-out head, and in some cases, the take-up. After some frantic placements of hocky pucks to keep the print on the platter, I have shown several operators how to use the MUT to keep the show on the screen, and on occassion, I have shown some operators how to use the MUT when the variac failed. Some operators were so amazed that they would scratch their butt and say, "Jeeze, I would have never thought of that." In short, most thrown prints are caused by an electrical or mechanical malfunction, as well as some doofis threading it up wrong. Yes, Christie platters and some others run very smooth, and won't cause any real problems. But when they do, a print tuck may not work. These are just a few......Innovation works!  ******************************************************************** Brad said: "And no, platter timing has no effect on how tight the print winds." ********************************************************************* Brad is 100% correct in that statement. Paul
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|