Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Don't get me wrong Fox...I love your title, but... (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Don't get me wrong Fox...I love your title, but...
Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-14-2002 04:58 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill, you may have had defective dts discs, but I know of one theater that had that exact same problem and it wasn't the discs. Try plugging your dts unit into another AC circuit. Get a 100 foot extension cord and run it down the hall if you have to. A UPS backup battery also works IF you have it set to provide full power (many backups lower the power, but still keep it going...that's no good here.) What is happening is that there is so much power being drained from the system that the dts unit glitches from low voltage. That is why it hits at the iceberg scene. Lots and lots of amplifier power is required to run that scene. On your public screenings I'm betting you had turned the fader down just a tad. Been there, done that. Now I overspec all sound rack circuits.


 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-14-2002 05:22 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What Brad is describing is a major "sag" in the AC line voltage. Kind of like plugging in a space heater to the same circuit as a PC and then finding that the PC reboots whenever the heater kicks on. This is precisely why computer equipment (which is what the DTS unit is) needs clean, stable AC input. I've seen high-powered consumer audio amplifiers cause lights in my house to flicker or dim noticeably, right in sync with the music being played.


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-14-2002 06:12 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm trying to figure out just when Fox really started dropping the volume off on a lot of their films. Alfred Newman's "Fox Fanfare" theme is lacking oomph on many recent hits, such as "X-Men", "Star Wars: Episode I" and many notable others. I have movies in my DVD collection where the theme is much more boldly pronounced. The volume was still up when "True Lies" introduced the current Fox logo in 1994. I think my favorite rendition of it is on the opening title of "Die Hard." I was really impressed with the 70mm print of it back in 1988. It even sounds great on the newest Five Star DVD.

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-14-2002 07:02 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dumb question: are the relative sound levels the same on the optical track, as the digital tracks? Your post made me think about how CD's have been recorded over the years. CD's today are extreamly compressed, and clipped, but up untill a few years ago, they used the dynamic range of a CD much better, recording at a much lower level. Play a CD made 10 or 15 years ago, and then one made today, and notice the difference in level (as well as the distortion of the newer CD). Well, anyway, what I am getting at here is, was the opening tag digitaly recorded some time ago, according to the thinking of the day; and the feature is recorded the way digital is done today? Since it is digital, they just transfer the bits from the "old" recording of the tag, and dont try to adjust the levels?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-15-2002 01:03 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm assuming most are talking about the Fox logo's volume level when presented in digital sound formats (couldn't tell you about the optical track level). The same volume drop off has also happened consistenly on DVD as well.

The Fox Searchlight feature "Sexy Beast" was mentioned earlier for having weak volume on the title (as well as being out of synch on the print). The DD 5.1 audio on the DVD is in proper synch. However, I made the mistake of turning up the volume a bit since the logo volume was low. Then the levels of the boulder rolling down the hill at the end of the opening title was just deafening! Whoa, I was jumping for the volume control on my receiver.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Haney
Master Film Handler

Posts: 265
From: Cupertino, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 04-15-2002 01:56 AM      Profile for Aaron Haney   Email Aaron Haney   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The thing that amazed me was how hard it was to keep the DVD in sync
with the film, we had to pause it all the time because it kept
getting well ahead of the movie on the screen.

Clearly in Film we run at 24 FPS, Video/DVD (pal) run at 25 FPS
(US 60Hz use some kind of frame skipping) so I know thats the problem


Yes, PAL video versions of standard 24fps films are sped up by about 4% and shown at 25fps. NTSC versions use 3:2 pulldown and run at more or less accurate speed.

Getting back on topic: I've noticed that a few times in the theatre and been puzzled by it. I'm disappointed that the sound doesn't have much "oomph" to it during the fanfare, thinking that it's too bad I've paid to watch a movie at sub-optimal volume, but then when the movie itself gets going, it sounds fine.


 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 04-15-2002 03:18 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Apropos the MGM pussycat, he certainly appears before 1927, though admittedly without the 'mieow'. I've seen him on lots of opening titles from MGM silents, including recently Greed (1924) and the tinted George Eastman House restoration of The Unholy Three (1925).

MGM was formed by a merger brokered by the producer Irving Thalberg in the autumn of 1924, so I guess the logo must date from then.


 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 04-15-2002 03:41 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm in agreement regarding the low volume and lack of deep bass in the Fox Fanfare that introduces many of their movies.

Many of you have indicated that you really like the current Fox logo (when it is appropriately loud and dynamic, of course), however, I'd like to mention that I actually have come to dislike the current fanfare logo. Why? Because the current version is timed so it can include both the studio fanfare AND the "CinemaScope Extension." Okay, so you're saying you really love that piece of music. I do too...but "flat" movies shouldn't include it! That piece of music was introduced to be included on Fox's CinemaScope movies in the '50s. I feel it was effectively "re-introduced" for "Star Wars."

In the '70s and '80s, many of the Fox movies used a silent logo. But with the exception of the "Star Wars" movies (which were scope, and used the '50s version for the first movie and a newer, original recording for the others that I don't think was ever used on any non-"Star Wars" Fox movies) and "The War Of The Roses" (which was 'flat," but used the full fanfare with extension in an interesting way), I cannot think of very many other Fox movies that used the full version until they switched to the current version (in 1994?).

I'll bet that people around 30-35 years old or younger think of the full Fox fanfare with CinemaScope extension as "belonging" to "Star Wars," whereas people in their 50s or older probably (correctly?) associate the music with the CinemScope films of the 1950s.

And as far as "Die Hard" having one of the more effective renditions of the fanfare, I certainly agree, but does anybody know what was up with the image for the Fox logo that was used??? It was stretched outward for those first two "Die Hard" movies. It's as if a "flat" version was incorporated into the "scope" negative. (Don't grab your DVD to see what I'm referring to as they've used a different version.)


 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 04-15-2002 10:04 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can confirm that at least the first Die Hard movie used a flat version of the logo that was stretched out horizontally on the screen.

And as many others have noted, I've wondered why the volume level of the fox fanfare is often so weak. It's a great piece of music, needs to be played loud and dynamic! Preferably with the C-Scope extension.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-15-2002 10:51 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was 19 and working my first theatre in Houston TX. The first time I was allowed to run the feature by myself (if I am not mistaken it was FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX, scope with the full CinemaScope Extension. The first thing I did was to pump the fader up (Simplex big gray box with a knob the size of your whole hand) at least 3 points. The old projectionist came in early one day and asked why I did that -- I thought I was in trouble, but when I said, I really didn't know except that it should be played LOUD. He said, kid, you've got it in your blood. I guess he was right. I still do that today, and as everyone is saying, today it really needs it.

That's the nice thing about running change-over -- you're always there to do that kind of stuff.

Frank

PS -- I'll tell you a funny story about that volume control later....right now I've got to go prep a print of CHELSEA WALLS -- new Ethan Hawke film that we are previewing tonite (BEFORE it opens in Manhattan on the 19 -- GO BROOKLYN!) And if I've already posted it here, let me know. I can't remember if I did or not.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 04-15-2002 12:47 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks guys for the "heads up" about low audio level on the Fox logo. Has this been a consistent "feature" of the logo of late, or is it only on occasional titles?

I guess I'll have to rig up something similar to John Wilson's solution in order to have that "grunt" every time. IMNSHO when an audience hears that logo they know they're about to see a movie! Yes I'm biased--my dad was a music editor at Fox from the early '50's through the early '70's, and my mom was a dancer in several Fox films during the '50's (they met on the set of The Egyptian). My folks used to joke that we should stand and salute whenever we kids heard that logo.

Paul



 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 04-15-2002 06:45 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael C: All the Star Wars movies -- including the 1997 re-releases and Episode 1 -- have used the 1953 CinemaScope fanfare. With today's theater sound systems that 1953 recording sounds cheesy.

The Sound of Music opens without any Fox fanfare -- extended or otherwise. That's because Fox largely abandoned the fanfare by 1965 (cost-cutting?) and The Sound of Music was filmed in Panavision.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-15-2002 08:07 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"The Sound of Music" was filmed in Todd-AO, 65mm negative:
http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Studio/8849/Moviemusicals/Edelweiss/salzburg.h tm
http://hjem.get2net.dk/in70mm/magazine/lister/formats/toddao.htm
http://hjem.get2net.dk/in70mm/magazine/backissues/2001/66/show_of_shows/show.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 04-15-2002 09:42 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, only Star Wars used the fanfare lifted from a 4-track mag print (of "River of No Return," a Marilyn Monroe picture) when they couldn't find a stereo master. They liked how the tinny sound contrasted with the big sound that followed. It was retained in the Special Edition.

Empire and Jedi used a (then) new recording of the fanfare conducted by John Williams, a version which most folks acknowledge lacked oomph. It wasn't entirely clear from the articles I read whether it was retained in those two SE's or replaced by a more recent one.

As for Moulin Rouge, I'll have to listen again but I always liked the way the film opened.


 |  IP: Logged

Bob Healey
Film Handler

Posts: 93
From: Milford, CT
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 04-15-2002 11:10 PM      Profile for Bob Healey   Email Bob Healey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just spent a weekend running Empire and Jedi Special Editions. The fanfare (what was left after someone butchered the head) was definately quieter than the main theme which followed.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.