|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Don't get me wrong Fox...I love your title, but...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 04-14-2002 07:02 PM
Dumb question: are the relative sound levels the same on the optical track, as the digital tracks? Your post made me think about how CD's have been recorded over the years. CD's today are extreamly compressed, and clipped, but up untill a few years ago, they used the dynamic range of a CD much better, recording at a much lower level. Play a CD made 10 or 15 years ago, and then one made today, and notice the difference in level (as well as the distortion of the newer CD). Well, anyway, what I am getting at here is, was the opening tag digitaly recorded some time ago, according to the thinking of the day; and the feature is recorded the way digital is done today? Since it is digital, they just transfer the bits from the "old" recording of the tag, and dont try to adjust the levels?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Aaron Haney
Master Film Handler
Posts: 265
From: Cupertino, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 04-15-2002 01:56 AM
quote: The thing that amazed me was how hard it was to keep the DVD in sync with the film, we had to pause it all the time because it kept getting well ahead of the movie on the screen.Clearly in Film we run at 24 FPS, Video/DVD (pal) run at 25 FPS (US 60Hz use some kind of frame skipping) so I know thats the problem
Yes, PAL video versions of standard 24fps films are sped up by about 4% and shown at 25fps. NTSC versions use 3:2 pulldown and run at more or less accurate speed.Getting back on topic: I've noticed that a few times in the theatre and been puzzled by it. I'm disappointed that the sound doesn't have much "oomph" to it during the fanfare, thinking that it's too bad I've paid to watch a movie at sub-optimal volume, but then when the movie itself gets going, it sounds fine.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 04-15-2002 03:41 AM
I'm in agreement regarding the low volume and lack of deep bass in the Fox Fanfare that introduces many of their movies.Many of you have indicated that you really like the current Fox logo (when it is appropriately loud and dynamic, of course), however, I'd like to mention that I actually have come to dislike the current fanfare logo. Why? Because the current version is timed so it can include both the studio fanfare AND the "CinemaScope Extension." Okay, so you're saying you really love that piece of music. I do too...but "flat" movies shouldn't include it! That piece of music was introduced to be included on Fox's CinemaScope movies in the '50s. I feel it was effectively "re-introduced" for "Star Wars." In the '70s and '80s, many of the Fox movies used a silent logo. But with the exception of the "Star Wars" movies (which were scope, and used the '50s version for the first movie and a newer, original recording for the others that I don't think was ever used on any non-"Star Wars" Fox movies) and "The War Of The Roses" (which was 'flat," but used the full fanfare with extension in an interesting way), I cannot think of very many other Fox movies that used the full version until they switched to the current version (in 1994?). I'll bet that people around 30-35 years old or younger think of the full Fox fanfare with CinemaScope extension as "belonging" to "Star Wars," whereas people in their 50s or older probably (correctly?) associate the music with the CinemScope films of the 1950s. And as far as "Die Hard" having one of the more effective renditions of the fanfare, I certainly agree, but does anybody know what was up with the image for the Fox logo that was used??? It was stretched outward for those first two "Die Hard" movies. It's as if a "flat" version was incorporated into the "scope" negative. (Don't grab your DVD to see what I'm referring to as they've used a different version.)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 04-15-2002 12:47 PM
Thanks guys for the "heads up" about low audio level on the Fox logo. Has this been a consistent "feature" of the logo of late, or is it only on occasional titles?I guess I'll have to rig up something similar to John Wilson's solution in order to have that "grunt" every time. IMNSHO when an audience hears that logo they know they're about to see a movie! Yes I'm biased--my dad was a music editor at Fox from the early '50's through the early '70's, and my mom was a dancer in several Fox films during the '50's (they met on the set of The Egyptian). My folks used to joke that we should stand and salute whenever we kids heard that logo. Paul
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 04-15-2002 09:42 PM
Actually, only Star Wars used the fanfare lifted from a 4-track mag print (of "River of No Return," a Marilyn Monroe picture) when they couldn't find a stereo master. They liked how the tinny sound contrasted with the big sound that followed. It was retained in the Special Edition.Empire and Jedi used a (then) new recording of the fanfare conducted by John Williams, a version which most folks acknowledge lacked oomph. It wasn't entirely clear from the articles I read whether it was retained in those two SE's or replaced by a more recent one. As for Moulin Rouge, I'll have to listen again but I always liked the way the film opened.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|