Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Light cues (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Light cues
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-19-2004 11:01 AM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
*Seek out whoever invented that cue detector and automation and beat them to a bloody pulp. It won't fix your problem, but at least you will feel better about it. Let me know before you book your flight. I'll go with you and hold the bastard down. I've put up with more than enough bullshit from that automation system to deserve that honor.
Once again, physical violence solves everything! [Big Grin]

Brad is not kidding. Those cue detectors are pure [bs] ! One theater I was at that used these was a nightmare. I just started waiting by the projectors to bring the lights up and down. Easier than changing these things every other day.

But nothing is worse than the Big Sky opticues which might as well be permenant since when you try to remove them, it ruins the film.

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 07-19-2004 12:14 PM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never had any reason for complaint about the Strong/EPRAD FP350 Cue Detector, nor the CE FM 35 for that matter. I do prefer the FM 35 as it's more flexible and monitors film motion & presence, as opposed to simply monitoring presence.

All my theatres use the pre-cut pulse tape, and most if not all use a small piece of splice tape, then the pulse tape, and a small piece of splice tape on top. That way the cue lasts indefinitely and is easy to remove at the end of the run.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-19-2004 01:45 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
From the few responses so far, it would sound like I got an entire batch of defective units. (Not that Strong would do anything about it.) Still, that's horrible quality control.

Steve, if I can remember, I'll take some closeup shots of a modified Kelmar reader for you. They can be modified to scan the SDDS areas of the film with minimal effort.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 07-20-2004 12:54 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We use FM35 detectors at our indoor house. We lay enough tape on the sprockets to cover about 2-2.5 holes. I also put splicing tape over the cue, but only enough to cover the sprockets. The tape does not go into the image. This protects the cue, makes it last as long as I'm interested in it, and peels off easily when we break down.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-23-2004 11:08 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Where is Wolff King Morrow??? I want to know what kind of equipment he is running based upon the discussion on page 1 of this thread. I have a bet riding on it. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 07-24-2004 01:12 AM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
From the few responses so far, it would sound like I got an entire batch of defective units. (Not that Strong would do anything about it.) Still, that's horrible quality control.

I havent had all bad experiences with them, but have had a quite a few. The most common problem for me is that the cue sensor itself breaks off and you cannot solder it back on. It would be nice if you could jsut buy that board and change it out yourself, but they make you send it back and get a refurbished one.

So Brad, is there anything strong that you like?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-24-2004 01:13 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I like their water circulators with the submersible pump quite a bit. Nice and quiet. They do the job well. Highly recommended.

 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 07-24-2004 04:39 AM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
And oddly enough I've had nothign but trouble with the water circulators! OK there isn't much to go wrong with the big plastic tub, but the life of the pumps has been a joke, we replace them with pond pumps from garden supply stores.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-25-2004 09:09 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I haven't had any problems with their pumps, but a few of the tubs leaked out the bottom.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.