Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » how much do you get paid?? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: how much do you get paid??
Paul Turner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 115
From: Corvallis, OR, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-09-2002 12:45 AM      Profile for Paul Turner   Email Paul Turner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm an owner, and like Mike said, all I get is equity. Well, that and all these women throwing themselves at me. Sure makes the snack bar line move slowly . . . and that gets old for the other customers. I pay my wknd manager $9.50 an hour. He's got about 10 years experience running projectors. He's worth a lot more since the only times I get paged when he works is when the picture is off the screen. None of the, "We're out of big lids. Can you get some by tomorrow?" pages form the $6.50 an hour staff. ("Ok, Kids. Today we're going to discuss the concept of paging me only in case of emergency. Can you say emergency?")

 |  IP: Logged

Eli Blasingame
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Loleta, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 2001


 - posted 02-09-2002 02:43 AM      Profile for Eli Blasingame   Email Eli Blasingame   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Aaron, stop crying, I wish I WAS IN YOUR SHOES. I have been doing this for 11 years and you know how much i make. But we'll talk about that next time your up. LOL, luv ya man

 |  IP: Logged

Laurence Hammett
Film Handler

Posts: 16
From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-12-2002 12:20 PM      Profile for Laurence Hammett   Email Laurence Hammett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lots of interesting posts in this thread! Bottom line is that automation came in and management bean counters decided that a guy could run more than one machine. This is true but one COMPETANT guy. Instead there is usually a parade of people going through your average multiplex and the customer doesn't scream about the poor quality.
Some Management will say we have excellent training programs. Well that may be true but if they don't stay long enough to APPRENTICE and get good then what is the point?

Of course there are those willing to accept minimum wage simply because they love the work and the group. That is fine and many become competant doing so but eventually most will want to move up and find their way hindered by the next guy willing to work for less. After all, he did.

Smartest thing I ever did was to get out of the booth. I was working union jobs but the typical contract is a buck raise over 3 years and less jobs. And this has been going on for 20 years. Same buck.

Get educated. Do your job very well and insist that you get paid well for what you do.

------------------
Laurence Hammett
Service Technician
projection35@earthlink.net e-mail – 323-377-0882 Cell

 |  IP: Logged

Roy Claflin
Film Handler

Posts: 5
From: East McKeesport, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-13-2002 12:57 AM      Profile for Roy Claflin   Email Roy Claflin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Currently, I make $7.00/hr running a 22-screen theater, and have been for about two years. My shifts range from 8 hours to 17 hours (black friday). I work about 45-50 hours a week, and in Pennsylvania, there is no such thing as overtime for theater employees.

But I'm not complaining. I love it, plus I get free movies. And considering how many movies I watch in a week, I think I got a great deal. When I hear things like 'no benefits, except free movies', I get confused and disheartened. How can you be in this business and not consider 'free movies' a good benefit? And if your current employer doesn't let you see free movies, I'd suggest joining another team.

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 03-04-2002 06:46 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bringing this topic up to the top again

This weeks headline article in "Parade Magazine" was how much do you earn in your career. One of our local news casts followed up the article in relating to Tucson, AZ.

After doing their research, they found that a cab driver or waiter/waitress in a fancy restraunt can earn just as much or more than a professional college grad w/a Masters. They compared being a cab driver or waitperson against a veternian, college professor and some other professionals. In fact, around here, many college grads opt for working in these labor/service professions because they can earn more than if they were in their chosen professional field of study.

AZ is a right to work state where wages really stink. Thank you Ronald Reagan, you heap of ! Ronald Reagan really screwed our country, and it took a lot to fix the national defecit...thank you Ronny !

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Lacheur
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 650
From: British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 06:57 PM      Profile for Ron Lacheur   Email Ron Lacheur   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Post Secondary is a joke. You can spend years in college/university and come out expecting the big bucks and find yourself with nothing.


It's insulting to find out that a cab driver can make as much as a person with a Masters degree.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 07:34 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's not insulting at all that a cab driver can earn more than a person with a masters degree! Why is that insulting? In America, if you get out there and hustle and bust your ass, and/or make your employer value what you do for them, and choose the right career field, you can make PLENTY, with or without a college education. I don't have a college education, and last year I made, well, let's just say PLENTY. My sister, who has TWO masters degrees, has worked for 12 years at the University of Oregon, and she earns much less than I do. Is that unfair?

Someone else earlier in this thread pointed out that the reason theaters only pay minimum wage for important positions like projectionists is simple: People will do the job for that level of pay, and do it more or less competently. So why would theaters pay more? It seems they don't need to. If you want to make more money, you probably need to find a different career field.

[Full Disclosure: I was "downsized" last year and am currently unemployed, so technically I am making NOTHING right now except unemployment]


------------------
- dave
Look at this! His chin strap has been cut!

 |  IP: Logged

David Favel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 764
From: Ashburton, New Zealand
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 08:08 PM      Profile for David Favel   Email David Favel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Note to self, re-watch the start of Reservoir Dogs re pay.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-04-2002 08:52 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When I left exhibition (about a year and a half ago) I was earning $400 a week to supervise projectors, film handlers and print traffic. The chain I worked for had 20 screens in four locations (on three islands).

In my absence a whole lot of bad stuff happened and so I'm back by popular demand...this time as an independent contractor.

At first, they agreed to pay $100 per hour but I saw where that would become a disincentive to call for help...they'd probably wait for all hell to break loose before calling. The other option was to call the guy from Miami...he could easily cost over $1,000.00 per day.

We needed a compromise of what was fair to me and, yet, affordable for them. I was also in favor of not letting those machines go to hell in a handbasket. I remember installing them and it's hard to see your handiwork torn apart.

Eventually, we struck a deal whereby I would do preventive maintenance (which includes one session of my six-week operator training program) and non-electrical repairs for a "kinder, gentler" monthly fee.

------------------
And, hey! Let's be careful out there.

~Manny.


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-05-2002 02:46 AM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you Ronald Reagan for giving us the longest peacetime expansion in United States history.

The reason that the deficits grew is not because REVENUES went down ... but because the Democrats in the Congress had to spend it on everything. Hmmm ... let's see ... he RAISED revenues, but there was still a deficit. Sounds like time to reign in expenditures.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Ziegler
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 753
From: West Hollywood, CA
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 03-05-2002 05:18 AM      Profile for Jim Ziegler   Email Jim Ziegler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will, I'm sure people in Berlin share your sentiment about Reagan, after all, because of him, someone tore down their pretty wall...

And to think of all the Stasi agents out of work too...

Damn Reagan...

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 03-06-2002 04:28 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, what did Reagan do?

Unlike real heros like James Stewart and Bob Hope who either served actively in the US Armed Forces or were involved in the USO, like Reagan and John Wayne managed to stay put in Hollywood where all was safe and cozy~I have never heard of Reagan or Wayne having so much as participated in a USO show, even on the homefront.

I believe that Reagan hopped onto the Joseph McCarthy coattail, was a snitch/rat, and helped to shatter many innocent lives.

During Reagan's Presidency, more of his staff were either indicted or went to prison than all of the other U.S. Presidents combined.

Who can forget the Iran/Contra affair and how he weaseled out of that one?!

It seems that Reagan took complete credit for the downfall of the European Eastern Block/USSR. This is not true! This was an accumlation of decades and several Presidentcies. What Reagan did was to escalate a military spending war which bankrupted the former USSR. In the process, he also screwed up the American economy/defecit which took years to clean up! Who can forget his "Star Wars" plan, what a joke that was!

What about Reagan's attitude towards Labor Union busting and the deregulation of the air traffic controllers. I can personally tell a few stories about this! It was during Reagan's time in office that many skilled jobs took a downturn, IATSE being one of god knows how many examples!

An of course, he did take credit for the hostage crisis when he first came into office, when in fact he had nothing at all to do with it.

It is also now known that Reagan did not have all of his mental capacities while in office, and relied on much of his staff to direct his every move. Notice how Reagan was never able to answer, or avoided answering random questions from reporters? Well........

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 03-06-2002 06:41 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is not the place for a political debate but there are some factual errors that should be corrected.

Mike Spaeth stated:
>The reason that the deficits grew is not because REVENUES went down
>... but because the Democrats in the Congress had to spend it on
>everything. Hmmm ... let's see ... he RAISED revenues, but there
>was still a deficit. Sounds like time to reign in expenditures.

That is flatly incorrect. Under Mr. Reagan spending on most domestic programs was cut. The record deficits were run up because of a combination of a tax cut and the huge increase in military spending. For example from $155.1 billion in 1979 to $251.2 billion in 1987 (both are given in 1982 constant dollars).

Will Kutler wrote:
>What about Reagan's attitude towards Labor Union busting and the
>deregulation of the air traffic controllers.

Air traffic controllers were not "deregulated." They went on strike. The strike was illegal. They were fired. They knew the law when they took the job. I am no fan of Reagan but I saw nothing wrong with the action he took in this case.

>It was during Reagan's time in office that many skilled jobs took a
downturn, IATSE being one of god knows how many examples!

I presume you're referring to IA in the booth. I think blaming the downfall of the union projectionist on a president is a bit silly. The invention and large scale deployment of the platter, xenon, and to a lesser extent the automation box is what has hurt union employment.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Ziegler
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 753
From: West Hollywood, CA
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 03-07-2002 03:29 AM      Profile for Jim Ziegler   Email Jim Ziegler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmmm, Reagan killed unions? GOOD! For that fact alone he should be given sainthood.

Apparently you were asleep during the Eighties, or you would have noticed the largest peacetime economic expansion in history..

Reagan's military policies? Before Reagan took office, our military was in such bad condition that it could not handle a hostage rescue. The post-Reagan military crushed Iraq with minimal loss of life towards our troops.

Welfare spending went down? GOOD! "He that does not work, neither shall he eat." Welfare is a stupid idea. The govt should not be taking my money to pay some bum not to work, which is exactally what was going on before limits were placed on welfare.

More than half of Reagans staff went to prison? Can you name them?

Iran-Contra? Who cares? We sold spare F-14 parts and missiles to Iran, which they used up vs Iraq (making Iraq easier for us to defeat), and in return got the Iranians to pressure radical Islamic groups to release Americans they were holding. If you were a hostage, wouldn't you want your President to do something?

Scott, maybe you should move these posts to Yak...


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-07-2002 12:22 PM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Let's look at some of the hard statistics:

Individual income tax revenues increased from $286 billion in 1981 to $349 billion in 1986.

Overall tax revenues increased from $599 billion in 1981 to $769 billion in 1986. Reagan's 21 million NEW jobs saw to that.

Social Security spending rose from $118.5 billion in 1980 to $287.5 billion in 1992. Medicaid increased from $14 billion to $67.8 billion. Food Stamps from $9.1 billion to $21.8 billion. AFDC from $6.9 billion to $15.1 billion. From 1980 to 1992, defense spending rose 30 percent, while social spending rose 44 percent.

The last three Reagan years, the deficit dropped into the $150 million range, which BEATS the first few years of Clinton's presidency ...

Source for these numbers? The Statistical Abstract.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.