|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Cue Dots done wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 02-07-2002 11:16 AM
I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail is cut short. For instance, last week I was preparing a print of {Hedwig and the Angry Inch}, and the tail of one reel was short by 2 feet 10 frames, which put the motor cue at 6.25seconds from the end.I ended up adding a hand-made cue (w/ Clint Phare cue marker) 1 second from the end, but ultimately I'm not sure that was necessarily the right thing. Choices seem to include: a) It's not possible to have a perfect (cue at -8sec, cue at -1sec) on this print, so no permanent cue marks should be made at all. Use a temporary mechanism? b) Make a permanent cue mark 1 second from the end, and expect everyone to deal with the non-standard cue dot spacing (what I did). c) Make a permanent cue mark 1 second form the end, and 8 seconds from the end, and assume that future changeover projectionists will ignore the second set of cues (the lab cues), and not get confused by the presence of 3 cue dots (I hate it when that happens...) d) Add an extra 2'10f of black at the end, and mark the cue dot on that (at 1 second from the end). In retrospect, perhaps d) might have been a better choice, because the scene was a fade to black anyhow (which is probably how it got short anyhow -- a careless job of plattering the print...), but it seems to have a significant chance of disrupting the experience, especially w/r/t the soundtrack. I hadn't heard of the temporary adhesive dots that John Pytlack mentions before; perhaps that's something we should have in our booth. Is there a recommended vendor, or does one just use standard stickers available at a stationary store? I suppose, even using adhesive dots, my inclination would be to leave them in place in a situation like this, since I would expect any changeover theatre would appreciate having the cues timed properly, and plattering theatres are unlikely to care. Though I suppose perhaps plattering theatres would like to avoid the disruption of presentation that spurrious cues might represent...
| IP: Logged
|
|
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000
|
posted 02-07-2002 12:34 PM
John Hawkinson asked: "I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail is cut short."I would opt for using temporary cues, with a new motor cue and new changeover cue at the proper distance from the last frame before the tail. Be sure your tail leader is really BLACK, and in frame so you don't see white framelines, etc. if you mistime the changeover. For review, here is the cue spacing per SMPTE 301: Motor Cue 4 frames Distance between Cues 172 frames Changeover Cue 4 frames Distance to Last Frame 18 frames TOTAL LENGTH 198 FRAMES Brad's recommendation of putting only one cue dot on a piece of removable splicing tape is viable, since a good projectionist WILL see a single frame cue if they know it will be so quick. The tiny Avery gummed dots are fine, or you could use one of the Letraset or Presstype dry tranfer decals (if you can still buy them): http://www.internetmodeler.com/2001/november/new-releases/decals_AFT.htm http://www.dotprint.com/profiles/letraset.htm ------------------ John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243 E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 02-07-2002 11:05 PM
Craig Hanham wrote: >Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under >priviliged beings who still do changeoverPlatters or big reels would be fine if the prints were delivered that way but for a screening room situation which is what I do as long as 20 minute reels are the rule I'll stick to changeovers, thankyouverymuch. With a late arriving print I can inspect one reel and be on screen in minutes--or if I have faith that the dots will be there--in seconds. And when the show is over the print can be in the hands of a waiting courier moments later. Makes life a lot easier when there are 15-20 different films to run in a week. Sadly, the vast majority of my work is not actually running the films but inspecting and repairing the damage done by the platter people (no Film-Tech-ers I'm sure!) Many of my prints are new or have only been screened reel to reel but no way to know until it's inspected. It would be interesting to contemplate a world where all prints arrived in "Movie Movers" (tm) or similar and you would need only drop it on a platter and thread-up. John Hawkinson wrote: >I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail >is cut short. Well you pretty much have to add a new C/O cue unless you want to rely on the sound of the head splice of the new reel going through to know when to change to it. I would just scribe the dot as you did. As you say, that then leads to the question of whether to make a new motor dot or go with the non standard spacing and adjust thread-ups of subsequent reels. I've done it both ways (including leaving information for the next operator in the latter situation. Lately I've been leaning towards the former (new cue).
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 02-08-2002 01:45 AM
Although we are change-over venues, our policy for the last dozen years has been not to make any permanent cues (especially emulsion-scribed cues) on prints that come in without them (quite a few foreign films do), or prints with incorrectly placed cues. Our reasoning is that probably 98% of all theatres run platters or use LP reels; and they don't need cues. Making permanent cue marks means that the print will be unnecessarily marked for the rest of its useful life with useless, image-marring marks. Why should there be ANY foreign marks in the visible image that future audiences will see, when those marks serve no purpose? Instead of the Clint marker (which, as good as it is, doesn't make a cue as unobtrusive as a black dot lab cue), we have been using Letraset cues for years. They are still available, although more expensive than before the company lost business to computer graphics. Letraset's black dots come on a thin strip in a convenient dispenser and can be applied directly to the base of the film so that removing them doesn't risk scratching the emulsion. We had been talking to the company based in England on the possibility of printing the dots on the strip so that they would be correctly spaced for frame distance. You would then only have to orient the adhesive strip over the four frames and the cue dots would be spaced correctly. They could do this, but it wasn't cost effective. So, using their off-the-shelf product (the dots are spaced closely together), you need to place each dot correctly in the frame corner slice it off the roll with the razor blade. Once you get the knack of it, it's takes only a few seconds. The adhesive is quite aggressive and you don't need to cover the dots with splicing tape. They have never come off in everyday operation. U can use regular cleaners like FilmRenew or Ecco 1500 and unless you make it a point to rub them off, they will stay put. We let the next platter house or LP reel projectionist decide if he wants to remove them. Point is, they will come off if you don't need them. We also use Letraset's line graphic tape. It comes in very thin lines that are great to cover up those gashes in the emulsion -- I've even used it to black out those XXXs that show up as cues. The lines (called Border Tapes) come in a variety of thickness, one size is the exact width of the soundtrack and it is great for blooping out splices. You can also use this material to strengthen badly made splices that have a gap between frames -- you know, the ones made by incorrectly aligned splicers that don't cut EXACTLY in the center of the frame-line. You can place the black line tape over the gap and then put a piece of splicing tape over it. The splice won't then buckle or fan-fold and you don't have to loose any frames. The last Letraset product that we use is their graduated film. This is a sheet of thin film that has a gray scale from totally black opaque to transparent. When you get an old trailer or even a print where the sound just cuts off because of missing footage, you can create your own fade by applying the graded strip over the film. This causes both a picture and sound fade-out. It's not the same as getting the footage back, but it sure makes the ending less abrupt. If anyone wants the Letraset product numbers and the Letraset contact in England, just email me. CinemaDude@aol.com
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|