Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cue Dots done wrong! (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Cue Dots done wrong!
Michael Hunt
Film Handler

Posts: 63
From: Gloucester, Gloucestershire, UK
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 02-02-2002 02:07 PM      Profile for Michael Hunt   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Hunt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
personally, I'll put removeable cues on for a one off show, but use a Premier cue dot marker, and lightly mark them...

The hand carved dots in this print of Apocalypse Now are about two feet across on the screen!!!

------------------
There must be more to life than Film and Rugby...

Gwan Glawster!!!

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-02-2002 05:30 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John -- German prints also have a non-standard distance between the cue marks. I think the motor dot occurs sooner than it would with US-standard cues.

I use a Clint Phare cue marker. It's possible to make cues with this that are no more obtrusive than lab cues. It is the only acceptible way (to me) to make cues on existing prints. Hole-punchers are particularly bad offenders...

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 02-02-2002 11:11 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott; Thanks, I didn't know about the different distance between cues on German films. It can't be too far off, since it looked OK when I ran it.

I ran a brand-new IB print of a 1952 film and noticed for the first time you can see the image through the serrated cue.

 |  IP: Logged

Mathew Molloy
Master Film Handler

Posts: 357
From: The Santa Cruz Mountains
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-03-2002 01:09 AM      Profile for Mathew Molloy   Email Mathew Molloy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some time ago I saw a near-mint print of Bambi. Heads and tails were still intact on this original release print as well. However someone in obvious need of a pair of glasses saw to it to scratch six or so X's across the entire frame for both motor start and c/o on every reel - including a set just for curtain cue. I will never forget that.

Another Bozo move I see often is a print where someone's cut in their own reel changes because they were too lazy to find the actual splices only to have the next dufus scribe/punch new cues on (usually 5 minutes before/after the real cues!) Ran a print of Apocolypse about 3 years ago that was nothing but shoe polish and c/o cues from one end to the other.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-03-2002 11:55 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Are you sure that wasn't the XXX rated version of Bambi

 |  IP: Logged

Craig Hanham
Film Handler

Posts: 79
From: Wellington, New Zealand
Registered: Oct 2001


 - posted 02-06-2002 09:28 PM      Profile for Craig Hanham   Email Craig Hanham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
yeah well um er I've got to admit that I scratch my own marks when necessary , but in my defence I have copy of the SMPTE standards for cue marks over the bench, and I try to make them as subtle as possible. Since I run change over I have to check splices and marks as normal set up.
I agree with the remarks concerning some of the blind or ignorant projectionists out there.
"A cue dot should be .094" (2.38mm) in diameter, the centre half way between top and 2nd sprocket hole .281" (7.14mm) from rt-hand edge of film with heads up on emulsion side." and marked on 4 consecutive frames. (about 1/6 second viewing time). The c/o cue is 18 frames before start of tail - so those prats who cant strip tape and cut a new frame to splice up a patter etc well nuff said.
Its the motor start cue that varies - for Academy leaders 10 feet 12 frames before c/o cue: for universal leaders 10 feet 8 frames.
Like all those good film-techers who like to see film done right I hate over-exuberent marks that stand out like dogs-balls.
Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under priviliged beings who still do changeover rarely have to take things into our own hands, but could the phantom marker wielder stop blacking them out.
But what twit in their right mind would actually punch a hole completely through the print OH DEAR.

rant over
embarrassment
will do better in future


 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 02-06-2002 11:29 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SMPTE-55 (SMPTE Universal Leader)
Motor Cue
4 frames
Distance between Cues
168 frames
Changeover Cue
4 frames
Distance to Last Frame
24 frames
TOTAL LENGTH
200 FRAMES
====================
ASA Z22.55 (Academy Leader) and SMPTE-301 (SMPTE Projection Leader)
Motor Cue
4 frames
Distance between Cues
172 frames
Changeover Cue
4 frames
Distance to Last Frame
18 frames
TOTAL LENGTH
198 FRAMES
====================


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-06-2002 11:37 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under priviliged beings who still do changeover rarely have to take things into our own hands."

Uh oh, now you've done it! (I'm going to go hide before Steve shows up. )

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-07-2002 11:16 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail is cut short. For instance, last week I was preparing a print of {Hedwig and the Angry Inch}, and the tail of one reel was short by 2 feet 10 frames, which put the motor cue at 6.25seconds from the end.

I ended up adding a hand-made cue (w/ Clint Phare cue marker) 1 second from the end, but ultimately I'm not sure that was necessarily the right thing.

Choices seem to include:
a) It's not possible to have a perfect (cue at -8sec, cue at -1sec)
on this print, so no permanent cue marks should be made at all.
Use a temporary mechanism?
b) Make a permanent cue mark 1 second from the end, and expect
everyone to deal with the non-standard cue dot spacing (what I
did).
c) Make a permanent cue mark 1 second form the end, and 8 seconds
from the end, and assume that future changeover projectionists
will ignore the second set of cues (the lab cues), and not get
confused by the presence of 3 cue dots (I hate it when that
happens...)
d) Add an extra 2'10f of black at the end, and mark the cue dot
on that (at 1 second from the end).

In retrospect, perhaps d) might have been a better choice, because the scene was a fade to black anyhow (which is probably how it got short anyhow -- a careless job of plattering the print...), but it seems to have a significant chance of disrupting the experience, especially w/r/t the soundtrack.

I hadn't heard of the temporary adhesive dots that John Pytlack mentions before; perhaps that's something we should have in our booth. Is there a recommended vendor, or does one just use standard stickers available at a stationary store?

I suppose, even using adhesive dots, my inclination would be to leave them in place in a situation like this, since I would expect any changeover theatre would appreciate having the cues timed properly, and plattering theatres are unlikely to care. Though I suppose perhaps plattering theatres would like to avoid the disruption of presentation that spurrious cues might represent...

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-07-2002 12:34 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John Hawkinson asked: "I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail is cut short."

I would opt for using temporary cues, with a new motor cue and new changeover cue at the proper distance from the last frame before the tail. Be sure your tail leader is really BLACK, and in frame so you don't see white framelines, etc. if you mistime the changeover.

For review, here is the cue spacing per SMPTE 301:

Motor Cue
4 frames
Distance between Cues
172 frames
Changeover Cue
4 frames
Distance to Last Frame
18 frames
TOTAL LENGTH
198 FRAMES

Brad's recommendation of putting only one cue dot on a piece of removable splicing tape is viable, since a good projectionist WILL see a single frame cue if they know it will be so quick. The tiny Avery gummed dots are fine, or you could use one of the Letraset or Presstype dry tranfer decals (if you can still buy them):
http://www.internetmodeler.com/2001/november/new-releases/decals_AFT.htm
http://www.dotprint.com/profiles/letraset.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-07-2002 11:05 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Craig Hanham wrote:
>Fortunately most labs still print cue dots,so those few poor under
>priviliged beings who still do changeover

Platters or big reels would be fine if the prints were delivered that way but for a screening room situation which is what I do as long as 20 minute reels are the rule I'll stick to changeovers, thankyouverymuch. With a late arriving print I can inspect one reel and be on screen in minutes--or if I have faith that the dots will be there--in seconds. And when the show is over the print can be in the hands of a waiting courier moments later. Makes life a lot easier when there are 15-20 different films to run in a week. Sadly, the vast majority of my work is not actually running the films but inspecting and repairing the damage done by the platter people (no Film-Tech-ers I'm sure!) Many of my prints are new or have only been screened reel to reel but no way to know until it's inspected.

It would be interesting to contemplate a world where all prints arrived in "Movie Movers" (tm) or similar and you would need only drop it on a platter and thread-up.

John Hawkinson wrote:
>I'm curious what people think about marking cue dots when a tail
>is cut short.

Well you pretty much have to add a new C/O cue unless you want to rely on the sound of the head splice of the new reel going through to know when to change to it. I would just scribe the dot as you did. As you say, that then leads to the question of whether to make a new motor dot or go with the non standard spacing and adjust thread-ups of subsequent reels. I've done it both ways (including leaving information for the next operator in the latter situation. Lately I've been leaning towards the former (new cue).

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-08-2002 01:45 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although we are change-over venues, our policy for the last dozen years has been not to make any permanent cues (especially emulsion-scribed cues) on prints that come in without them (quite a few foreign films do), or prints with incorrectly placed cues. Our reasoning is that probably 98% of all theatres run platters or use LP reels; and they don't need cues. Making permanent cue marks means that the print will be unnecessarily marked for the rest of its useful life with useless, image-marring marks. Why should there be ANY foreign marks in the visible image that future audiences will see, when those marks serve no purpose?

Instead of the Clint marker (which, as good as it is, doesn't make a cue as unobtrusive as a black dot lab cue), we have been using Letraset cues for years. They are still available, although more expensive than before the company lost business to computer graphics. Letraset's black dots come on a thin strip in a convenient dispenser and can be applied directly to the base of the film so that removing them doesn't risk scratching the emulsion. We had been talking to the company based in England on the possibility of printing the dots on the strip so that they would be correctly spaced for frame distance. You would then only have to orient the adhesive strip over the four frames and the cue dots would be spaced correctly. They could do this, but it wasn't cost effective. So, using their off-the-shelf product (the dots are spaced closely together), you need to place each dot correctly in the frame corner slice it off the roll with the razor blade. Once you get the knack of it, it's takes only a few seconds. The adhesive is quite aggressive and you don't need to cover the dots with splicing tape. They have never come off in everyday operation. U can use regular cleaners like FilmRenew or Ecco 1500 and unless you make it a point to rub them off, they will stay put.

We let the next platter house or LP reel projectionist decide if he wants to remove them. Point is, they will come off if you don't need them.

We also use Letraset's line graphic tape. It comes in very thin lines that are great to cover up those gashes in the emulsion -- I've even used it to black out those XXXs that show up as cues. The lines (called Border Tapes) come in a variety of thickness, one size is the exact width of the soundtrack and it is great for blooping out splices. You can also use this material to strengthen badly made splices that have a gap between frames -- you know, the ones made by incorrectly aligned splicers that don't cut EXACTLY in the center of the frame-line. You can place the black line tape over the gap and then put a piece of splicing tape over it. The splice won't then buckle or fan-fold and you don't have to loose any frames.

The last Letraset product that we use is their graduated film. This is a sheet of thin film that has a gray scale from totally black opaque to transparent. When you get an old trailer or even a print where the sound just cuts off because of missing footage, you can create your own fade by applying the graded strip over the film. This causes both a picture and sound fade-out. It's not the same as getting the footage back, but it sure makes the ending less abrupt.

If anyone wants the Letraset product numbers and the Letraset contact in England, just email me. CinemaDude@aol.com

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-08-2002 02:28 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
When running changeover on prints that are cut short, this is what I always did.

Count the distance from the last frame on reel 1 back to the "motor" cue. I then took that number, made my "projector startup speed" calculation and noted with a piece of tape on the head of reel 2 what the thread up number was to be in the gate. Now I never actually placed "cues" on the print. My solution was to just go 1 second back from the final frame on that reel 1 and lay a piece of clear splicing tape down. The thin black horizontal splice lines were plenty for me to see and were nowhere near as obtrusive as a cue of any kind. When I finished with my last presentation, I simply unreeled the film a few feet and peeled off that piece of tape. This way I never had to put ANY marks on the film.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-11-2002 12:37 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In today's episode of Film Done Wrong we have the usual example of masking taped-on leaders combined with a dose of breakdown-via-scissoring-the-print resulting in the loss of a frame at each join. But what interests me is the remnants of the tape used to build the print. Clear tape? No self-respecting wielder of masking tape would be caught dead using clear tape to build up. Did they run out of their beloved opaque tape or did an enlightened management put presentation quality first and refuse to buy it? We'll never know. But the intrepid platter jockey was not stayed in his/her effort to shave every possible second from the labors at hand. The solution? Color the *entire* width of the splicing tape with white grease pencil!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.