Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » inflatable screen's? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: inflatable screen's?
Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-13-2004 09:35 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Peter,

yes same screen I'm sure and the same people putting it up?

I have some pictures somewhere of the Trafalgar Square job with the front guy ropes almost vertical....

I'd done a few jobs as you know and when it went well the whole thing looked great. Its all down to using the right people who will follow the instructions for safe use! or is that me just being silly?

Looking back it was all being done on the cheap and they got away with it.... one day it will all go horribly wrong and someone will get hurt. Then it'll be pass the buck time, but nothing new there then.

[ 04-14-2004, 06:36 PM: Message edited by: Ken McFall ]

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-13-2004 07:17 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's one we ran in North Sydney over Christmas...

 -

The screen was bought from Germany. The image area is about 16m x 8 m.

The four blocks on each corner each weigh 1 tonne

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Fitzgerald
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 224
From: Castle Hayne, NC, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 04-13-2004 10:59 PM      Profile for Mike Fitzgerald   Email Mike Fitzgerald   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So I guess my question would be how big a container would you need if you wanted to use water as a ballast on the screen. The containers could be filled with 1 ton of water. A fire dept water pummper could be used to fill them each time.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-14-2004 03:47 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Water weighs approximately 8.3 pounds per gallon.

Anchors and guy wires:

http://www.aesc.net/Safety/index.cfm?action=view&pdfid=27

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-14-2004 04:03 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John is that 8.3lbs per gallon fresh spring water or the water that can't be used from redeveoloping soundtracks [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Kaufman
Film Handler

Posts: 16
From: San Pedro, CA, USA
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 04-14-2004 04:05 PM      Profile for Ray Kaufman   Author's Homepage   Email Ray Kaufman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In furtherence to John's response, that would calculate out to 5, 55 gal. drums per corner for a bit over 2200 lbs. per line. Hardly a fire truck needed. Just a decent hose line under good pressure.

Actually, during Showest, I had the pleasant opportunity of speaking at length with Christian from the German manufacturer of Airscreen, which is distrib'd by Harkness Hall. From what I've seen, they're an excellent solution to temporary screens in an outdoor setting. They beat the heck out of scaffold systems. To be sure, if what's needed is a semi-permanent installation, to stay in place for any real length of time, then a scaffold system, with a solidly backed screen, (to avoid cupping the sheet in any kind of breeze,)is likely necessary. But if it's for a single show or even a three or five day show, the airscreen is worth looking into. For multiple days, at the end of the evening's show, simply deflate and start over again the following day by simply inflating the frame.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-14-2004 04:09 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
John is that 8.3lbs per gallon fresh spring water or the water that can't be used from redeveoloping soundtracks
Fresh water, of course. [Big Grin]

You wouldn't want to drink the water used to wash off soundtrack developer until it went through a municiple sewage treatment plant.

I wonder what they do with "heavy water" from nuclear reactors? [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-14-2004 06:24 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ray the system is ideal for use in the way you describe. Thats how we used it, left laid out overnight and then reflated the next day.

But for safe use it needs to be used sensibly. There is also a rear sheet that goes on the rear side that would reduce the sail effect on the actual screen surface and help keep it flat, we didn't have one so the screen did distort quite a lot.

It needs at least four, preferably six, people to raise and lower the whole thing. At the end of the event it can be rolled up with the screen in place, if its going to be used soon after, but its a dead weight and very difficult to man handle. Getting it back into the van was a real struggle. Some thought needs to be given to an easier way to move it around.

Here are some pics of the Trafalgar Square setup.... note the front guy ropes are FAR too close to provide proper safe stability.

 -

 -

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 04-14-2004 06:28 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John P. Pytlak
I wonder what they do with "heavy water" from nuclear reactors? [Wink]
Why they reuse it of course! Heavy water (D-sub2,0) has a life span longer than nuclear facilities and can be reused. No need to dispose of it.

As far as I know, the 32 CANDU reactors in use worldwide are the only nuclear reactors used for electrical generation that use heavy water. The CANDU design is more efficient than light water reactors, using 15% less fuel for the same output. They are also online refuelable (other reactors must be shut down) and can use natural uranium, eliminating the need for an expensive enrichment process.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 04-15-2004 05:43 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does the banner under the screen refer to the long-bearded rigging crew ? Is a comedy of errors ?

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Blake
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 558
From: esperance western australia
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 04-15-2004 07:02 AM      Profile for Phil Blake   Author's Homepage   Email Phil Blake   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
These inflateable screens look like a real silly thing, particularly on the australian coast when the winds are rather strong at times.

One great portable screen is the side of a truck pantech (white one) , there is a guy over here running a travelling show , uses the truck and trailer to cart equipment , the side of the truck is the screen and the trailer is the bio box , I am sure a semi trailer pan at 45' by 10' would make a far more stable screen .

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 04-15-2004 10:49 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter you have him nailed in one.... [thumbsup]

The comedy of errors happened in Sctoland at an Asda store event. Two generators failed the screen fell over when it was being inflated, because someone decided to lace the screen incorrectly and the ties all got caught up etc etc....

These things really do need to be used with some intelligence.

If you look at the posting from John above you can see it was done perfectly... then look at the Trafalgar Square pictures and it is clear the ballast tanks were too close and the whole thing was unstable.

I have a picture somewhere of the screen actually bending over and almost touching the stage in front! The audience was constantly going ooo and ahhh as the thing was bending all over the place.

Shortly after that comedy of errors I walked off another event and left them to it. Was never asked to do another one after that [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Philip Borgnes
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 04-27-2004 11:23 AM      Profile for Philip Borgnes   Author's Homepage   Email Philip Borgnes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Phil Blake
One great portable screen is the side of a truck pantech (white one) ...

I have always thought this idea of using the side of a truck would be a much better solution than an inflatable screen for many presentations.
A few years ago I saw one of these advertising trucks driving around town. It isn't hard to imagine a screen in place of the ad banner. In fact you could use the truck to drive around town to advertise the event and then put it in place to screen the show.
 -
 -

The display area size is 10' tall by 22' long.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-21-2004 11:44 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The problem with that screen on the truck is that it's too close to the ground. Heads from the audience would encroach the image area pretty easily and would be darn annoying.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Lott
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 246
From: Fairbanks, AK, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 07-22-2004 12:52 AM      Profile for Joshua Lott   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Lott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thomas... as per your questions on page 1.

From what I understand a frame set up for that size is about $40,000 and the screen will cost you another $11,000.

These are prices that I was quoted. (email me for further info.)

What are you working on?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.