Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cat 700-701 improved or not? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Cat 700-701 improved or not?
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 04-07-2002 05:52 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, any of them (699, 700) are still better than the best basement reader, IMHO.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 04-07-2002 06:29 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greg,
I suppose with your machinist background you could build a clone using Component Engineering parts. .....or you could buy a BACP for almost the price of a used 701.....
Richard Fowler
TVP-Theatre & Video Products Inc. www.tvpmiami.com

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-07-2002 07:17 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh there is not reason for that John. There is no real advantage to the penthouse in terms of reliability, unless you technician isn't up to the task.

In fact, in recent experiments, I was quite impressed with Kelmar's digital reader and it's ability to scan quite reliably to very low light levels (below 2V p-p on the O'Scope). I don't think I have had such results with the penthouses. My guess is it has something to do with the various grade of lenses since they all use the same CCD and board by Dolby (there is a new CCD and board out now that is more sensitive but with a focus penalty). I believe I have even heard Dolby claim that Kinoton's basement reader tracks every bit as well as their penthouses.

Anyway...back to the subject John, no mention was made of basement readers, just the Cat. 700 and 701...even the previous mentions of Cat. 699s were off subject.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 04-07-2002 10:34 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, we all know how these threads like to go from one subject to another.

------------------
This one time, at Projection Camp, I stuck a xenon bulb....

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.