Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 70mm Sound Formats (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: 70mm Sound Formats
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 06-09-2002 11:20 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
You'll be seeing more this year (70 dts)

Tell us about it !
What ??! What ??!


Think 40th anniversary...

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2002 06:46 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just to show that I am not "imagining things" with regard to the
Format 43 mix of "Superman: The Movie", I offer this tidbit from a DVD File "Inside the Disc" feature about the film's audio restoration, and a quote from producer Michael Thau (who worked with director Richard Donner and supervising sound editor Jay Neirenberg on creating the remastered track:

Quote:
"Going back to the original mix, we were shocked when we heard it. We grabbed the original 70mm full-coat that actually had the label from the Pinewood stage on it; it had a date of November 1978. We put it up in a dubbing stage. We had Dolby down there a couple times verifying that the set up on the Dolby units, the decoding, was correct. Superman was the first film that was originally recorded in a 70mm 6-track split surround but here's the rub that no one knows about but it's the truth. They mixed in split surrounds but they did not use the surrounds very much, especially in a stereo way because it was very new and they were very scared of it. At the last second, here in America, they brought it over to do some final mastering on the 70mm and they chickened out and the film was only released with mono surround in the 70mm format. So they mixed it for stereo surround, but it was never released that way and the fact is that there wasn't much difference anyway."

Now, I could have sworn Richard Donner and Creative Consultant Tom Mankiewicz said something about the same topic during their commentary, but I just can't seem to find it in a scan.

Nevertheless, when one considers just how rushed the first "Superman" movie was in post production and that the Format 43 process had never been publicly shown, it is easy to see just why anyone who saw the original 70mm prints in North America heard only a Format 42 mix.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2002 06:47 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I almost forgot. Here's a link to the page where I grabbed the quote.
http://www.dvdfile.com/news/special_report/inside_the_disc/superman/thau_4.html

 |  IP: Logged

Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-10-2002 08:29 PM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
> More DTS70 this year ? - Think 40 years ann. <
----------------------------------------------------

1962's worth a restauration:

Lawrence - been done (not dts, but done...)
HTWWW - too many strips for me...
BOUNTY - damned anamorph

Whoever knows, please come up front !

Per

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2002 08:51 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think "Mutiny on the Bounty" was Ultra-Panavision. I know that's anamorphic, but it is still shot on 65mm. I certainly would not complain about a 40th anniversary print of that.

However, I would say if anything from 1962 gets a 40th Anniv. treatment, odds are 9 of 10 it would be "Lawrence." That film would also seem to be the easiest to do in 70mm DTS.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-10-2002 09:33 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A new print of "Lawrence" is a given. Theatres already have it booked.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-10-2002 11:46 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby, I read the linked article you provided a quote from. Here's another interesting quote:

Quote:
"With dialog it doesn't really matter that much because you normally put the dialog down in the center channel anyway. Superman was different; they actually draped it across the whole front three speakers, which really prevented us from using any of the original mix. It doesn't work that well and sounds strange. Stereo was kind of a new gadget and I think they were just playing with the new toy. Dialog is best kept in the center channel for clarity."

While it is true Superman used directional dialog, it was hardly a new "gadget". Stereo, complete with directionalized dialog had been used in movies for, oh, 25 years before "Superman." Hardly a "new toy" or concept. It just goes to show that these memories on DVD commentariy tracks and in film journals are not always the accurate sources of information people make them out to be.


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-11-2002 12:05 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul,

I agree with what you say in regards to the people referring to things like dialog pans across stage channels as a "new gadget". Some wrongly believe 70mm Dolby A mag was the originator of 6-track magnetic sound. A lot of film fans today don't know about past formats like 70mm mag having ever existed.

Still, the item in dispute (whether "Superman" had an actual Format43 mix on original release prints) is different. With someone closely involved with the project stating the film was mixed for it but never released using it stands as a very specific claim, not a generalized opinion about sound mixers playing to liberally with a new toy.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 06-11-2002 08:08 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bobby,

RE: "Superman"

I don't feel the quotes you supplied from the DVDFile article necessarily proves much of anything. Why? Because I have spoken to Michael Thau, one of the producers of the "Superman" restoration project and DVD, and received information that condradicts his quotes supplied to DVDFile.com. You see, as with DVDFile and other publications, I too had prepared a story on "Superman" which incorporated interview material with many of the people involved in both the original production and the restoration. Mr. Thau and one of his producing collaborators, Jonathan Gaines, were gracious enough to invite me to sit in on two days of work on the project (one day for the sound mix, one day for the video transfer). There were additional conversations as well, and I simply have a different impression of the original sound mix and release than the quotes supplied to DVDFile.

Does this prove anything? No. But it does point to how people quite simply are not always armed with correct information, no matter how "connected" to a project they may be.

Now, if only some experienced projectionists on this forum (Gordon? Steve?) could weigh in on my question a few posts back about what an audience would actually hear if a print was in Format 42 but played back in 43. The question is whether or not the surrounds and "baby boom" would disappear if intended for 42 but played back in 43.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-11-2002 09:43 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
42 played in 43: Boom channels would still be there. Surrounds would disappear except for the low end which would be pulled off the mono surround channel on track #6. A-type playback of tracks 2 and 4 would probably have little effect on the boom channels and cut the hiss of the mostly silent (except for LF) surrounds.

Maybe they should have put a barker announcer into the mid & high on Format 42 prints like some tv stations do on their SAP audio: "You are set to the wrong playback mode...!"

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 06-11-2002 10:17 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Going back to the original mix, we were shocked when we heard it. We grabbed the original 70mm full-coat that actually had the label from the Pinewood stage on it; it had a date of November 1978."

I assume that they don't actually mean '70mm full-coat', do they?

 |  IP: Logged

Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-11-2002 06:51 PM      Profile for Per Hauberg   Author's Homepage   Email Per Hauberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Right, Bobby - Bounty is Ultra Panavision. A new print would be just great - but how many of us will be able to run that one correct ?
The single danish print from back then did exist not so many years ago, and no distributor knew that, i'm sure. I screened it once - without having the proper lenses, but still - with the distortion, no doubt this was the real stuff. Knifesharp and still nice colors - but a lot of noise on every second reel. -This one would be just as popular a choise of the year as Lawrence - as Lawrence was here just some few years ago. -Nice, but still that damned dolby mix with all dialouge transferred to center in stead of original discrete front.
New version only second best - no matter the Spielberg marketing pep-talk. ("Never looked or sounded better...")
But what the fuck - as somebody allready claimed: Come on with all You've got, Karen !

Per


 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 06-11-2002 07:28 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Come on with all You've got

There's actually more than one 70mm-DTS release planned; I threw out the "think 40th anniversary" hint for only one of the titles. I am aware of the other titles being considered, but since they have not been officially announced for release the studios (and Karen at DTS) would not be too happy with me if I revealed the titles.

One "new" 70mm-DTS release I can mention, however, is the 1967 65mm French film "Play Time," which began some new screenings at the Cannes Film Festival a few weeks ago. Not sure if the print(s) will find their way to other countries.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 06-17-2002 06:21 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For lists of 70mm films, see this link

------------------
Cheers, Thomas


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.