Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Thickness of film stock (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Thickness of film stock
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-28-2002 09:51 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the environmental impact of Kodak's film cement in it's manufacture and use?

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-29-2002 09:05 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here is the MSDS for Kodak Professional Film Cement:
MSDS Kodak Professional Film Cement

Are you worried that past overexposure to the fumes has affected your judgement of environmental issues, especially regarding cyan soundtracks? Do you long for the days of cement splicing triacetate or nitrate prints?

BTW, Kodak has supported the development of more environmental alternative splicing cements:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/pp410.shtml

Of course, splices on today's ESTAR base prints are made with tape or ultrasonic weld splicers. Only one of the many advantages of today's polyester base prints.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-29-2002 09:27 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John wrote:
>Only one of the many advantages of today's polyester base prints.

That you *can't* splice via cement (not that I'd want to) is an advantage? Oh, maybe like the cyan tracks that *can't* be played on traditional equipment would be an advantage?


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-29-2002 09:33 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, I don't mind cement splicing. On acetate films, I'll still do it. With cement splicing, never had one of those pesky tape holes get stuck on the film too!

As for longing for the fumes...not to worry John, I still recone speakers...plenty of noxious fumes there! Heck the solvent is MEK or Acetone....BTW someone mention MEK was banned...I just in the last week saw it a NEW True-Value hardware store in the Annapolis, MD area. I have always used Acetone though...kinda like I've always used Varsol over Kerosene.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-29-2002 09:34 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The ability to use ultrasonic splices IS an advantage of polyester base.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-29-2002 09:39 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve said: "As for longing for the fumes...not to worry John, I still recone speakers...plenty of noxious fumes there! Heck the solvent is MEK or Acetone"

Some people worry about health and the environment, and at least try to improve it. Others prefer to do things the old fashioned way. At least your attitude is consistent.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-29-2002 03:14 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The ability to use ultrasonic splices IS an advantage of polyester base.

Oh yeah! NOTHING beats an ultrasonic splice. The other major advantage in my opinion is the fact that polyester base won't shrink over time like acetate tends to do.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-29-2002 03:54 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Another advantage of polyester-base stock is that it isn't susceptible to "vinegar syndrome" (where the film base turns to acetic acid and begins to self-destruct in an odiferous manner).

The only ultrasonic splices that I've seen are the dreaded "lab splices" which are made on unprocessed stock. One of these days, though, I'll visit Brad's theatre and see his splices....

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-30-2002 12:14 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some people feel there is a problem with the environment and like to dictate to others how to live whether there is a problem or not. I like to have the highest standard of living (ya only live once) and unless someone can show the the irrevocable damage to society on something (like the human population dying out or something) I don't give up things that work easily.

Bt take it out of enviromental issues for a moment...some day because somebody got injured or even killed at a baseball park, they are going to put up hockey like plexiglass screens, or even corded screens like they have behind home plate everywhere in the park to prevent the balls from flying into the stands because if it "can save just one life or prevent one injury it will be worth it..." When that day comes, I'll quit going to the ballpark because they will take away from the quality of the game. Nevermind the millions of kids and fans that go to the park with their mits to catch a ball (or even a bat) and have a memory of a lifetime. Ya know, if you go to a ballpark, you might get hit with a ball or bat, if you can't live with that for yourself or your family, don't go but don't tell me I should have a compromised experience.

So yes, I am consistant in many different areas and some are not even regarding the environment!

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-30-2002 09:10 AM      Profile for Ray Derrick   Email Ray Derrick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OK, so why not combine safety issues AND the environment.

In this country at some time in the past some idiot stood in the way of a reversing truck (or whatever) and got squished or maimed or something. So some bright spark in some Government department decides let's put a 3kHz beeper that outputs a deafening 130 decibels that will travel for at least 3 kilometers in every direction on the back of every vehicle that might at some time in it's life actually go backwards and might squish some idiot that was not paying attention to what was going on around them.

So now, anywhere you go in the Sydney metro area on any day of the week you cannot escape from those annoying beeping noises coming from some great distance from several different points on the compass. Of course they didn't take into account the fact that the idiot in question may be stone deaf, so one day soon no doubt we will also have some kind of human body proximity sensor that causes the brakes to lock up and the engine to sieze and just in case that doesn't work will release a dose of toxic fumes that instantly kill the driver of said reversing vehicle in order to save the life of our precious idiot.

You want cynical?, I'll give you cynical


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-30-2002 09:36 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just to be argumentative...

I actually approve of those beepers! Depending on the vehicle, of course. Some trucks (most of them) you are completely blind behind and "hope" nothing is in your way..on those, it is a good idea to have some sort of warning for reverse. I work in an industrial park, with a dozen or so docks pointing at each other...trucks are coming and going constantly...when those beepers go off, you tend to look up to see if you are a target. Heck, the UPS drivers if they don't have a functioning beeper will tap their horn.

Now tell me this, why at gated train crossings, the train has to blow his horn? The only one that is going to get hit is the one that ran through the crossing gate. Personally, I like the sound of train whistles and can determine what type of train is coming often by it's sound. This is important since my regular route home has an "at grade" crossing. If it is a passenger train, it will be quick. If it is a slow freight with 5 engines...best to go home the slightly longer way cuz you will be sitting at that crossing for 15-20 minutes.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-30-2002 10:22 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Back-up beepers for trucks backing into docks etc. makes some sense. But whoever decided they needed to go on front-end loaders that spend half their operating life going backwards makes no sense to me.

As for RR grade crossings, in many places there so many closely spaced crossings and frequent trains that the trains do not use their horns as it would keep an entire town awake all night long. Generally this is the result of a local ordinance as a RR would not take the chance owing to liability concerns. However the FRA has a proposed rule that would override local laws and make whistles (horns) mandatory everywhere and a lot of towns are up in arms about it and asking for wavers for crossings that have been statistically safe or for alternatives such as horns incorporated into the crossing protection signals which would be carefully aimed at the roadway itself.

Personally, I think people who run gates and get clobbered get what they deserve but unfortunately there are times when this results in death and injury on the train or other motor vehicles.

Steve: Another thing to listen for are the old time engineers or traditionally minded younger ones who signal for crossings with a --o- (long, long, short, long), the final long held til the train is on the crossing. Prior to two-way radios the whistle was used for communication (calling back a flagman, say) so the crossing signal had to be distinctive from other signals.

 |  IP: Logged

Ray Derrick
Master Film Handler

Posts: 310
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-30-2002 10:47 AM      Profile for Ray Derrick   Email Ray Derrick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve K, you are absolutely right. Backing trucks are not the problem, it is front end loaders, bulldozers and other such implements that go back and forth constantly that cause the grief.

I live in a semi-rural area on the outskirts of Sydney that is currently being overtaken by an encroaching suburbia. All I ever hear at home is "beep beep beep". Did they have to pick a single tone that is right at the most sensitive frequency of human hearing, did they have to make it soooo loud that it can be heard kilometres distant AND as you say, did they have to put it on vehicles that spend half their working lives going backwards??

Surely a small digital message device that announces "I am reversing, look out!" would be just as effective without driving the entire population of the surrounding suburbs insane.

Steve G, it is not at all like you to be argumentative!


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-30-2002 12:08 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thats not true!!!

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 07-01-2002 12:48 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why do some electric golf carsts have reverse beepers!??????

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.