Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Are there many theatres that can still show dual projection 3D? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Are there many theatres that can still show dual projection 3D?
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 09-10-2002 12:44 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Quote:
quote:
I think the best solution may be single strip 70mm, either two roughly Academy sized frames side by side for 1.37

This was actually done for an early 70's re-release of HOUSE OF WAX. I was told by a friend way back in college that someone at Stereovision told him six such prints had ben made. I remember seeing them advertised at the Chinese and a theatre in Orange County.
It was advertised as also having stereophonic sound, but whether this was the original mix or not (three stage channels from a seperate 35mm mag coat film, the surround from an optical mono track on one of the two image films, the other reel having a mono mix of the whole soundtrack), I don't know.

 |  IP: Logged

Fred Georges
Master Film Handler

Posts: 257
From: Lombard, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 09-10-2002 02:04 PM      Profile for Fred Georges   Email Fred Georges   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regarding "House of Wax" in 70mm side by side. The Russians have been doing this for years. As a matter of fact, I think StereoVision imported some of their projection attachments for the "HOW" 70mm engagements. Regarding "HOW" audio. The 70mm release restored the surround channel as this exists as an optical track and Warner Bros. didn't lose it. The stage channel for the 70mm release was mono as Jack Warner decreed ALL previus fullcoat elements be erased and the mag stock used to record audio for Warners Television production in the 50's. To this day Warners has yet to locate the original front stage stereo tracks for this title.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 09-10-2002 03:12 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In Los Angeles when the movies "Bwana Devil" and "House of Wax"
opened they played at the Paramount Theatre in Downtown Los Angeles.
"House of Wax" was presented in WarnerPhonic Sound. The Paramount theatre had 3600 seats and the projection throw was 190 feet. The Paramount had round the clock screenings, when "House of Wax" opened. In Long Beach, California the 3D theatre was the Fox West Coast Theatre. The West Coast was equipped for WarnerPhonic Sound also.


 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-10-2002 03:14 PM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Around 1965, might have been later, there was a revival of Natural Vision dual projection 3D at the ABC Broadway Cinema, Hammersmith. I took my wife a couple of times, who had never experienced 3D. Much to my surprise they were shown on a 1.75 wide screen which was effective.
The two projectors must have been carefully framed and not moved off the Natural Vision line-up chart! There certainly wasn’t any cropping that I remember, so I can only assume there was sufficient head room.
_________________________________________________________

Stephen,

Re: Classic Cinema, Picadilly Circus 3D. On reflection, by that time I would think that the light source must have been xenon! The Philips pulse light becoming extinct!



 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-10-2002 03:50 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here are some other pictures that was released in Hawaii in the standard version only and and I am not sure if they were ever released in 3-D. Based on what I saw, I bet the 3-D version must have been very effective if they were ever shown in Natural Vision in theatres. One of the film was a terrible but funny B&W grade C Sci Fi horror film with George Nader titled ROBOT MONSTER". Another one was "DRUMS OF TAHITI" with Dennis O'Keefe. There was another film that was a high quality production from Columbia Pictures that was based on "RAIN", a play by Sommerset Maugham. The movie was "MEET SADIE THOMPSON" starring Rita Hayworth, Jose Ferrer and Aldo Ray. This film did not appear to have any 3-D gimmicks but it looked like it might have been great in 3-D.

-Claude


 |  IP: Logged

Ben Wales
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Southampton. England
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 09-10-2002 04:22 PM      Profile for Ben Wales   Email Ben Wales   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone tried 3D (single Strip)at a outdoor event?.
I have been asked only this week about this very subject?

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-10-2002 04:58 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Claude wrote:

quote:
I alway thought the distance between the two projector must represent the same distance as one eye is to the other.

Claude, you are thinking about the cameras. The taking lenses are typically aligned to reproduce the average (adult) interocular distance of 2.5 inches. This is assuming a 45mm lens on a dual 35mm camera setup because a 45mm lens (with 35mm film) "sees things" about the same as the naked eye.

The interocular (or interaxial) can be widened to exaggerate the apparent nearness of the subject or to capture far-field scapes with more pronounced relief.

In projection, the images are lined up so they are centred to one another. The distance between projectors is not critical, except as it might relate to keystoning.

My favorite 3-D movie is still CAPTAIN E/O starring Michael Jackson. Written by George Lucas, Directed by Francis Ford Coppola. Co-Starring Dick Shaw and Angelica Huston.

CAPTAIN E/O was an attraction at Walt Disney World's EPCOT Centre, debuting in or around 1984. It played in the Magic Eye Theatre, part of the Kodak Pavillion in Future World. It may have played in Disneyland in Southern California, but I'm not sure about that. The Magic Eye Theatre featured in-theatre smoke and laser effects that were synchronized to the on-screen action.

CAPTAIN E/O was 17 minutes in length and cost about $17million to produce. It was shot (primarily) using twin 65mm cameras. Vittorio Storaro was the Director of Photography. The soundtrack was digital and it featured two songs by Michael Jackson. The first song, entitled "We Are Here To Change The World" has not been released. The second track, entitled "You're Just Another Part Of Me" appears on Jackson's "Bad" album.

The pre-show was a really neat 2-D, multiprojector slide show called "Making Memories."

~Manny (in Super 3-D)



 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-10-2002 09:29 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AFAIK, Kodak has sponsored several dual strip 70mm 3D shows: "Magic Journeys", "Captain EO", "Muppetvision 3D", and "Honey, I Shrunk the Audience".

http://incolor.inebraska.com/aat/imagination.html

Here's the camera rig:
http://www.hineslab.com/DisnyRig.html

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 09-10-2002 10:23 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Quote:
quote:
To this day Warners has yet to locate the original front stage stereo tracks for this title.

I know several WB titles have turned up from collector's that were Mag/optic CinemaScope films, but WB was pretty cheap when it came to saving the original elements. But since these mag tracks weren't on the film print itself, chances are even more slim of finding them.

I remember Variety's article on UA's "big" 70mm 3-D in 1979. I think they said their would be 12 channels of sound in the system, including overheads.

The Steve Guttenberg film was The Man Who Wasnt There, and seemed to last a week (a complete disaster).

I found almost all the 3-D films I saw to be mostly worthless and cheap looking (cant comment on Metal Storm, had to walk out, the convergence was HORRIBLE.)
Believe it or not, I Found Flesh For (Andy Warhol's) Frankenstein to be the only "modern" era 3-D film to show an artistic style. Acting was deliberately bad, but it was well photographed, with interesting sets. Although because of the timing of the "new" death of 3-D, we did miss out on Godfather 3-D. Who knows what Coppola would have done with the process? Probably quite a bit better than those responsible for Jaws 3-D, Amitiville 3-D and Friday the 13th 3-D (too bad Star Wars used VI for Return of the Jedi in 83!)

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-10-2002 10:55 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Although because of the timing of the "new" death of 3-D, we did miss out on Godfather 3-D. Who knows what Coppola would have done with the process?

I remember reading somewhere that Coppola had directed a 3-D porn flick entitled "Manhole." Can anyone confirm/disprove this?


 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 09-11-2002 06:03 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
3-D Movies : a history and filmography of stereoscopic cinema by R.M. Hayes, ©1989, ISBN 0-89950-407-8

Pages 61-63: "Four months after The Mask [opened in late 1961], Francis Ford Coppola's cannibalization Bellboy and the Playgirls opened in "adult" cinemas in several larger cities. (Coppola made a number of these early skinflicks, though he intentionally ignores their existence today, being a demigod to many apparently wise individuals who see some kind of talent in him that has escaped my attention.) This comedy was actually a West German black-and-white feature made in 1958 called Mit Eva fing die sunde an with new scenes inserted by Coppola. The new material, or most of it, was shot with a dual 16mm Auricon rig devised by Richard Kay and called Optovision. The cameras were arranged in the pattern of Natural Vision. The stereoscopic shots were then printed, in color, side-by-side onto the standard frame and via both an enlarging and polarizing converging device were projected. At least in one theatre. Other stereo-vision prints were presented in single strip anaglyphic duo-color format. According to the distributor only eight 3-D prints were actually made, and most engagements were flat in the hybrid black-and-white/color mismatching of original and insert scenes. This actually did do something for Coppola's career. It allowed him to make other "art theatre" films for "adults only" before signing on with Roger Corman as a dialogue coach, sound recordist, and whatever else he could get hired to do. Of course now he is generally known for the overly expensive bombs he has been making for years. (In all fairness, some of his films have been highly successful, but these usually are produced by others. Since a good producer is of far greater importance to any movie than a good director, Coppola can't really be given more than modest credit for the success of such features as The Godfather, Tucker: The Man and His Dream, and the few others he has directed which have been profitable.)"

Page 85: "The year 1977 saw the release of the first feature in 3-Depix, the hardcore homosexual trash Manhole. (Even the title was pornographic!) This was filmed with an early prototype lens unit and had only a 2:1 aspect ratio. Later versions of the single strip over-and-under process would have different framelines and a full 2.35:1 picture image. This film had extremely limited engagements even in the "lavendar" houses for which it was made."

Pages 136-138 (selections): "Bellboy and the Playgirls (Joseph Brenner Associates; February 12, 1962). Sequences filmed in Optovision (dual 16mm printed 35mm single strip side-by-side 1.66:1)." "Also known as The Playgirls and the Bellboy and The Beltgirls and the Bellboy. Also released with the 3-D scenes in single strip anaglyphic duo-color." "COMMENTARY: Francis Ford Coppola doesn't list this film on his credits, but he directed (and possibly wrote) it, and now his long-kept "secret" is out. The movie is a mishmash of black-and-white footage from the 1958 West German comedy Mit Eva fing die Sünde an with additionally shot monochrome and 3-D color scenes tossed in. It is pointless to really criticize this thing; it was made for the sixties "raincoat" crowd and intended only as a fast buck item to fill grindhouses specializing in so-called "adult films," which generally weren't very adult and seemed aimed more at twelve-year-olds, at least that is about the mentality level of these sort of things. Prints are still around on this, and it is interesting to see, not from an entertainment viewpoint, but because of its production history and being an early Coppola effort. I don't like Coppola's films by and large, but since many do, it should be seen if the opportunity arises. I think the original German footage is much better than the American inserts. Oddly, this reworked edition was also released in West Germany under its original title. It appears on European film lists as if it were actually a German-made 3-D film. I feel sure Coppola is more than willing to allow them to take full credit for it."

Pages 257-258: "Manhole (1977). Filmed in 3-Depix (single strip over-and-under 2:1). Director of photography and 3-Depix supervisor Max Glenn. 3-Depix technology Mortimer and Alvin M. Marks. 3-Depix converter Marks Polarized Corporation. Filmed in New York City. Eastman Color. Optical sound. Self-imposed rating: X. Only the above credits were available on this hardcore homosexual feature, but any credits that appeared on the film would have been pseudonyms anyway. The first film shot in 3-Depix, which at this time used the narrower aspect ratio. COMMENTARY: This film can be considered of interest for only one reason: it was the first movie in Marks' 3-Depix system and utilized an early version of that process which had wider framelines and a 2:1 ratio."


The "American Film Institute Catalog Feature Films, 1961-1970" entry F6.3849 is under The Playgirls and the Bellboy.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-11-2002 07:02 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't there something in the FAQ about quoting Doktor ["I held a ruler to 70mm film to find the aspect ratio!"] Haze without a suitable disclaimer? If not there ought to be.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 09-11-2002 07:18 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Quote:
quote:
it was the first movie in Marks' 3-Depix system and utilized an early version of that process which had wider framelines and a 2:1 ratio."

I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't wider framelines of an over-and-under single 3-D film produce WIDER AR frames?

QUOTE:

quote:
"The year 1977 saw the release of the first feature in 3-Depix, the hardcore homosexual trash Manhole. (Even the title was pornographic!)

As opposed to what? hardcore heterosexual trash?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-11-2002 09:29 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
>As opposed to what? hardcore heterosexual trash?

Soitenly. Or not hardcore or not trash. 3 parameters, each of which can assume 2 states (hardcore/not hardcore, homosexual/heterosexual, trash/not trash). Thus 2 ^ 3 (two cubed) or eight possible combinations!


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.