|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Making movie theatre images "camcorder-proof"
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 10-13-2002 01:14 PM
Here's an article along the same lines from yesterday:------- Industry Urges Students on Piracy Saturday October 12 1:33 PM ET SAN FRANCISCO (AP) Film and recording industry advocates are appealing to universities nationwide to help crack down on Internet-based piracy, which costs the entertainment world billions of dollars in lost revenues every year.
In a letter sent to more than 2,300 colleges, entertainment industry leaders called on the universities to educate students against pirating music and movies over broadband Internet lines available on most campuses. "We're simply trying to appeal to the universities for their help in making students aware of Internet theft," Jack Valenti, the president and CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America, said Friday. Valenti was one of four signatories on the letter. "Students need to know that just because everyone is doing it doesn't make it right," he added. In addition to educating students that piracy is tantamount to "electronic shoplifting," the industry trade groups called on the universities to implement penalties on violators. Most universities offer high-speed Internet connections in dorm rooms and computer labs, which some students use illegally to share or swap MP3 files and some film files. Peer-to-peer technology now allows computer users to tap into one another's hard drives and share files. Using 56K, or dial-up connections, films can take up to 12 hours to download, Valenti said. By comparison, high-speed connections allow feature films to be downloaded to a computer in minutes. Universities have been targeted because they are a common source of high-speed connections in the United States, where only 13 million homes have high-speed Internet access. The exchange of copyrighted files is not only a violation of federal law, it consumes valuable academic resources, the letter signatories said. "Stealing is stealing is stealing, whether it's done with sleight of hand by sticking something in a pocket or it's done with the click of a mouse," the letter's authors said. Ever since the music-swapping software Napster emerged in the late 1990s, students have been using enormous swaths of university bandwidth intended for the exchange of research data and other academic-oriented files. Quoting the Chronicle of Higher Education, the letter's authors said one university discovered that at least 75 percent of its available bandwidth had been used by students and people outside the university while exchanging files using peer-to-peer technology. Songwriters Guild of America President Rick Carnes warned that copyright violations threaten the future of the recording arts in the United States. "Copyright encourages the promotion of new arts in our culture," said Carnes, who has written songs for Garth Brooks and Reba McEntire. "Without those copyright protections, the future of the arts is threatened." The letter also was signed by Hilary Rosen and Edward Murphy, the presidents, respectively, of the Recording Industry Association of America and the National Music Publishers' Association. ------- Here are my questions/corrections: Internet piracy is a relatively new thing, no more than about five years old. If I am not mistaken, the Motion Picture Industry had a record box office year last year, and is on-track for another one this year. Where are these "billions of dollars" lost? Certainly not in the home video market as DVDs are flying off the shelves... quote: which some students use illegally to share or swap MP3 files
This statement makes it sound that ALL MP3s are illegal. And our university has taken exactly that approach. If you transfer an MP3 file over the University's network, even if it's your own grandma singing some song she made up while drunk, your account will be suspended. quote: By comparison, high-speed connections allow feature films to be downloaded to a computer in minutes.
Incorrect. Any video file, no matter how much you compress it, (unless it's at a postage-stamp resolution) will exceed 150mb for about a half hour of footage. That sized file would take a little over an hour to download on a high-speed connection. (Unless you have a dedicated high speed connection, not sharing it over hundreds of computers like most colleges do.) The only exception would be the RealVideo format, but who wants to watch a feature film in THAT?!?  quote: "Copyright encourages the promotion of new arts in our culture,"
Just the opposite. And I believe this was discussed in another thread so I won't go into it now. Maybe that's why these corporations are screaming that the 20-year extension on copyrights not be overturned. Disney still wants their $0.62 every time a clip of "Steamboat Willie" is shown on TV.I wonder exactly how the Universities will "educate" students on the horrors of internet file-swapping. Hopefully not the same way that Jr. High Schools educate kids in sex. "See how much fun it can be? Now don't do it!"  =TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Moriarty
Film Handler

Posts: 50
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 10-14-2002 03:06 AM
Bobby said: quote: I wonder if it is possible to put some kind of sequential serial number or specific watermark on DVD screener discs
It is possible, but there are a number of limitations. Obviously, if the disk is indivually marked in some way then it will have to individually cut/pressed, which could increase costs. Unfortuneately recordable DVD formats (that are compatible with home DVD players) have a lower capacity limit than standard DVDs, and some films may have to be spread accross more than one disk (esp. if higher quality soundtracks are to be used). The second problem is that the video files are often (substantially) further compressed for distribution on the internet, and so any marking system will have to be resistant to this level of modification. John
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 10-14-2002 07:33 PM
In multiplex where I fill in occasionally, there are two booths; in the "main" booth, there is a small B&W monitor, connected to two security cameras pointed at the screens serviced by the smaller booth. The idea is to provide a quick way to check on picture and framing when shows start in the other booth by automatic timers. Anyway, the security cameras are old tube models and the "look" of the picture on the monitor is interesting. It does flicker, but much less noticeably than it would if CCD cameras were used, due to the "lag" of the tube cameras. On the other hand, the actual picture quality is absolutely horrible (probably a result of the age of the cameras and monitor) and it is all but impossible to see what is actually going on in the onscreen images. I've used CCD cameras to record projected 16mm images (nothing copyrighted; just home movies and such) and the flicker is very annoying (this is using a machine with a 3-bladed shutter).I don't know about the consumer 24P camera, but the Sony HDCAM model does record at 24P natively and the playback deck can output at 24P. We had this equipment at a film festival where I helped out recently and we really should have tried recording a filmed image (with the permission of the filmmaker, of course) if someone had thought about it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 04-20-2003 11:50 PM
Here's something from the Local Seattle Rag that might prove interesting.
Hollywood comes up with a high-tech way to foil movie pirates
By GARY GENTILE THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
LOS ANGELES -- Hollywood sends enforcers with night-vision goggles into movie theaters and puts metal detectors outside advance screening rooms, but still the industry can't stop pirates from recording films and selling illegal copies before their theatrical debuts.
The problem is that the pirates are adopting ever more sophisticated technology, using tiny camcorders in purses and digital recorders about the size of a fountain pen.
Some hand-held computers "have an attachment that can record up to 122 minutes," said Jeffrey Godsick, executive vice president of marketing at 20th Century Fox. "Well, that's a whole movie in many cases. You can take the attachment and run it through a small hole in a tie or a shirt."
This is big business. The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that studios lose more than $3 billion a year from piracy in various forms. So the movie industry is trying to fight back with a high-tech solution of its own.
Cinea LLC, which created an encryption system for DVDs, and Sarnoff, a technology research firm, are developing a system to modulate the light cast on a movie screen to create a flicker or other patterns that would be picked up by recording devices, making the resulting images unwatchable. The disruptive flickers would be unseen by the human eye in the movie theater.
The "forensic watermark" system is designed to be used with digital projectors, which show movies stored on computer discs rather than traditional 35mm film. Only a few theaters have digital projectors, although most are expected to go digital by the end of the decade.
The research is funded by a $2 million grant from the Advanced Technology Program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency.
The technology takes advantage of the fact that the human eye and camcorders see the world differently. For example, a computer screen constantly refreshes an image, creating bars that travel across the screen. A camcorder picks up those bars, but not the naked eye.
Researchers are mindful that creating too rapid a flicker could trigger seizures in some people. They also discovered that using the flicker to write words across the image, such as "Copy," is not disruptive enough.
"It turns out that text isn't that annoying," said Robert Schumann, Cinea's chief executive. "Also, if it's just a static image, it's easier for the pirates to take out."
This technology would be a major improvement over the industry's current measures of trying to block pirate recorders, including night-vision goggles and metal detectors. Some of the piracy is an inside job: A pirate bribes a projectionist to set up a tripod in the projection booth.
"It is a system that will not stop camcording," said Ken Jacobsen, director of worldwide anti-piracy operations for the Motion Picture Association of America. "The best we can do is try to keep it out of the marketplace before a full domestic release."
Still, the industry knows that whatever technological gains are made over pirates will eventually be thwarted, requiring even more sophisticated countermeasures.
"There is a lot of money in piracy," Jacobsen said, "so it is worth people's efforts to try and defeat security."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|