Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Processors: Dolby v. DTS (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Processors: Dolby v. DTS
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-28-2002 10:06 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad writes:
quote:
There is no film that I am aware of that is released these days with DTS but not an SRD track.

here has just been released with DTS only (this is not given on IMDB but the Sight and Sound review gives DTS as the only sound format). French and Bollywood films which are DTS only get released quite frequently.
Obviously this is only an issue for arthouse venues.

Edit: Brad, am I doing something wrong posting the link? The word 'here' appears even though I entered the film title in that slot. When I went back and edited, changed the 'here' to the name of the film and pressed send, the 'here' still appears on the post (and yes, I did refresh the page).


 |  IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 10-28-2002 10:10 AM      Profile for Antonio Marcheselli   Author's Homepage   Email Antonio Marcheselli   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Stigmata" came to Italy With DTS only.

Antonio


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-28-2002 02:59 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I have asked and asked for a couple of years now that people posting long URLs edit their post so it doesn't jam up the page and I have edited URL after URL myself because people would not respect the policies. Enough is enough. That little feature is no longer. You must now word your sentences for the word "here" to appear.

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Huber
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 172
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-28-2002 08:13 PM      Profile for Jacob Huber   Email Jacob Huber   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am not very familiar with the Panastereo processors, but even though they are more costly, they seem to be the favorite around here sonically.

In the mind of one who runs an arthouse, I'm assuming that Panastereo is the best route? Also, where can I find a good (cheap) dealer of their products?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 10-28-2002 08:14 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
heretofore one could do as one wished but hereinafter, regardless of your heredity you're just going to have to be creative. Anything else would be heresy. So there.


 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 10-28-2002 08:18 PM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here here!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-28-2002 08:52 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
See how easy that is!

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 10-28-2002 11:05 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember the expression; "No one ever got fired for buying IBM."? Well the same could be said for Dolby....

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-29-2002 07:11 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jacob,
For analog, Pana is indeed LESS costly. For digital, buying the CP-650 (Dolby Digital) or the DTS-6AD (DTS Digital) or DFP-D3000 (SDDS Digital) are each the least expensive way to go.

As to flexibility, the Panastereo just tap-dances on the rest. As to sonic quality, it is "high-end." That is, it's components do more than just work...they are actually superior components.

However, it really depends on just what you want from a processor as to which is the best one for YOU. I have never believed in a one size fits all approach (except maybe for the CP-200 )

To answer your last question, there are many dealers that sell Panastereo.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.