Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Lamp Current (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Lamp Current
Andrew Shingleton
Film Handler

Posts: 63
From: Richmond, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-24-2004 06:09 PM      Profile for Andrew Shingleton   Email Andrew Shingleton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the info John. [Smile]

I've devised a forumula which I intend to use to help with the process of gradually increasing current throughout the lamps life. I plan on installing the lamps at 90% of their rated current (which in most cases is between 80-85% of it's maximum current), and then using this formula to calculate the ideal amp setting to adjust to each week. The result of following the formula will be a steady increase in amps throughout the first 4/5ths of the lamps warrenty period, reaching rated current at 80% and remaining there for the remainder of the useable life.

(r*0.9)+((r*0.1)*(p+(p*0.25)))

r = rated life in amps
p = percentage of rated life completed (expressed as a figure between 0 and 1).

There is also a qualifier that if the total of (p+(p*0.25)) is greater than or equal to 1, then r should be used instead (this will prevent the formula from telling me to use a current higher than the rated current). As an excel formula the shows as:

=IF(p+(p*0.25)>=1,r,(r*0.9)+((r*0.1)*(p+(p*0.25))))

(replace p and r with cell references)

Now if I've explained that properly and anyone's actually still on the same page as me, I was just wondering if there were any glaring flaws or problems with this formula, or more importantly with the method of xenon use that the formula facilitates? We intend to take xenon hour readings each week and then enter the data into a spreadsheet, which will use this formula to give a printout of the ideal current settings to be adjusted on a weekly basis. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-24-2004 10:52 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is a bit of a non issue as long as neither the voltage rateing and current rateing are not exceeded you are ok

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.