Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Sound formats (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Sound formats
Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 12:56 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No jhawk. The Dolby glossary of film terms also explains it specifically that way.
SR/SR-D is simply wrong (or maybe just superfluous).
The reason for this is that the first digital format CDS failed on the market because it replaced the analogue track and so had no backup.
Dolby made a lot of effort to communicate to customers that their format would have both. Many theater owners would not have bought it because digital sound was stigmatised as dropping out into silence when there was a problem. They also had to have reserve prints with analogue tracks.
The early Dolby catalogues used a lot of large and bold type to make it absolutely clear that the new format would only need single prints and was failsafe because of the fallback option.
That is why they called it Dolby Stereo Spectral Recording AND Digital.

Consequently using the term just for Dolby D is wrong usage. You couldn`t call DVD Dolby SR-D.
They also had to get rid of the Stereo part in the name of the formats because most people, and probably all potential buyers of home equipment, think that Stereo just means two channels.
"Why Dolby Stereo? I already have stereo TV!!"
So they came up with Dolby Surround which in turn confused many less enlightened operators. Many cinema employees to this day think SR means surround.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 01:08 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael wrote:

quote:
Analogue optical sound was introduced in 1927 (the first demonstration was in Berlin BTW, in 1922 or 23).

Michael,

Optical sound goes back a lot longer than 1922. Have a look at the work of the Frenchman, Eugene Lauste at:

http://www.amps.net/newsletters/issue22/22_lauste.htm

I can't say for sure that he was the first person to record optical sound, like most inventions it is difficult to find a single person, but he was certainly one of the first, but his name is now largely unknown.

I think the Tri-ergon system on 42mm film, the extra 7mm outside the perforations on one side carrying the track was about 1922.

Lee De Forest demonstrated optical sound films, using a V.D. track at the British Empire Exhibition at Wembly, in 1924. This used a track on normal 35mm film, in more or less the position still used today.

There were many other demonstrations of optical sound in the early '20s. do you know anything about the Berlin demonstrations, who gave them, the details of the system they used, etc.

Alex,

if you are including old systems, Perspecta was used on quite a large number of films between 1954 and 1957, there are still some prints around, and the Loew's Jersey has an original integrator installed; and used it to play 'Forbidden Planet' last year.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 01:46 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stephen, interesting link. I had never heard about Lauste. But that is why we visit film-tech.
There is a house in Berlin with a plaquette that says "The first demonstration of sound film was given here in 192??" or something like that. A friend explained the details to me and I have read some more about it, but I can`t seem to remember any valuable details right now. I think the film was "Das Maedchen mit den Streichhoelzern" ("The Girl with the Matches"). I will have to research that.
There is some connection between that system and the system used later by Fox Movietone.
There are many interesting and unknown details in the history of technology. I found out only recently that there was a guy called Max Kladanowsky who showed films publicly in a varieté theater in Berlin a few months before the Lumières. But his system failed, and he was forgotten until the 1930s. Then he was "rediscovered". He was running a newspaper stand in Berlin, and his story was blown up to epic proportions by the Nazi propaganda.
Which ensured that he was completely forgotten later because everybody could say "him, no he was just a bit of Nazi propaganda."
But he may have been the first one to project movies publicly - we will probably never know.

 |  IP: Logged

Douglas Curry
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: Garbutt, Queensland, Australia
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 02:25 PM      Profile for Douglas Curry   Author's Homepage   Email Douglas Curry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aaron Sisemore Wrote
quote:

As far as formats still currently in use they are:
...Dolby A Stereo with surround (Also includes the SVA clones such as Ultra*Stereo and DTS Stereo)...

Don't forget Dolby Stereo without surround [Eek!]
We still got one auditorium with this lowly sound format [Roll Eyes]
or at least that's what it says in the label [Wink] I'd have to check with the boss to be sure..

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-26-2003 02:29 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Lee De Forest demonstrated optical sound films, using a V.D. track at the British Empire Exhibition at Wembly, in 1924. This used a track on normal 35mm film, in more or less the position still used today.
Do you have any references relating to De Forest's work in Britain? For a long time now I've been trying to find out why there is a small block of flats called Lee de Forest House in Scarborough. I can't say I've been very systematic or determined about it, but the mystery intrigues me because, AFAIK, he had no connection with Scarborough whatsoever. I'd guess it's unlikely that we're talking about a totally different Lee de Forest.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 02:37 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael wrote:

quote:
Stephen, interesting link. I had never heard about Lauste. But that is why we visit film-tech.
There is a house in Berlin with a plaquette that says "The first demonstration of sound film was given here in 192??" or something like that. A friend explained the details to me and I have read some more about it, but I can`t seem to remember any valuable details right now. I think the film was "Das Maedchen mit den Streichhoelzern" ("The Girl with the Matches"). I will have to research that.

The fact that the film had a title suggests that this may have been more than just a demonstration, or at least more than a technical one, unless they took an existing film, and added sound to it. Was this actually in the house, or in some other building which was previously on that site?

Then he wrote:
quote:

There are many interesting and unknown details in the history of technology. I found out only recently that there was a guy called Max Kladanowsky who showed films publicly in a varieté theater in Berlin a few months before the Lumières. But his system failed, and he was forgotten until the 1930s. Then he was "rediscovered". He was running a newspaper stand in Berlin, and his story was blown up to epic proportions by the Nazi propaganda.
Which ensured that he was completely forgotten later because everybody could say "him, no he was just a bit of Nazi propaganda."
But he may have been the first one to project movies publicly - we will probably never know.

The now-closed Museum of the Moving Image in London used to hold special events on Wednesday evenings. At one time they were arranged by Brian Coe, by that time retired from Kodak, and later by Stephen Herbert. There was a series of lectures under the title 'Countdown to Cinema', given in the year or so leading up to the centenary. You will be glad to know that Max Kladanowsky was included in these lectures. Maybe Leo remembers this, I don't know if he was there at that time.

Everyone always seems to ask 'Who invented cinema', or television, or the motor car, or whatever, and there really isn't an answer in most cases, many people made a contribution. In the case of cinema, it is usually Edison and the Lumières who are remembered, and possibly Dickson, but there were many pioneers, working in many countries, and I think they deserve to be remembered as well.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-26-2003 02:40 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Don't forget the early work of Theodore Case and other pioneers:

http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~mhellman/history.html

http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/sound/sound04.htm#soundindex

http://tig.colorist.org/pipermail/tig/2002-May/000851.html

http://www.eastman.org/5_timeline/1919.htm

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/recording/notes.html

http://www.amps.net/newsletters/issue21/21_cine.htm

http://audiolabo.free.fr/revue1999/content/recording2.htm

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 03:01 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was a "real" film with a story. I am not sure if the building is original. It looks old, but it is in the center of Berlin and was probably bombed during the war.
I will see that I can do a little research. I think the plaquette also mentions the names of the people involved. That will make finding background info a lot easier.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeffry L. Johnson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 809
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 03-26-2003 04:05 PM      Profile for Jeffry L. Johnson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeffry L. Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Film Sound History: Film Sound Formats

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 03-26-2003 04:20 PM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Awhile back in this thread, Hugh McCullough mentioned a 4-track mag QUINTAPHONIC sound used by Tommy.

That got me to thinking...just how did they lay out the tracks on that? A group search turned up this information from 1997 on RAMT by Mark Baldock:

There is a magnetic 35mm version of "Tommy" which is recorded in
Quintaphonic. Track 2 carries the centre channel, tracks 1 and 3 are matrixed Dolby style to provide front left, front right, rear left and rear right. Dolby Labs built the CP100 cinema processor in the UK for this film.

The Google Toolbar Strikes Again!

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 03-26-2003 04:59 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stephen, observe this link from the same site Jeffry pointed to

http://www.mtsu.edu/~smpte/twenties.html

I think the three guys mentioned there are the ones who showed that movie in Berlin in 1922. I have asked a friend who lives near the building to go and check what it says there.

edit - The Google Toolbar struck once more

http://www.luise-berlin.de/bms/bmstxt00/0006gese.htm

They showed that film in a cinema called "Alhambra" - it has no connection to the "Alhambra" I worked for - in November 1922 on Kurfuerstendamm in Berlin. Or there might be a connection but I would have to research that.
But nobody wanted to invest in the Tri-Ergon system so they sold it to Fox.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 03-26-2003 09:50 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Don't forget Dolby Stereo without surround
I haven't seen a format 03 print since the early 80's. He did ask about formats 'currently' in use...

-Aaron

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-26-2003 10:18 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually Quintaphonic used DBX not Dolby NR

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-26-2003 11:45 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The first London engagement of the Quintaphonic version started out as Dolby NR. A licensing conflict prevented this from continuing, however (something about patents) so all subsequent Quintaphonic releases were DBX.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-27-2003 03:03 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The now-closed Museum of the Moving Image in London used to hold special events on Wednesday evenings. At one time they were arranged by Brian Coe, by that time retired from Kodak, and later by Stephen Herbert.
Both were there (Stephen was my boss) and organising Wednesday evening lectures in the MOMI fleapit. In the post-MOMI BFI, the programme planning people (or rather, their lords and masters) took the line that these were far too interesting and well-organised for the NFT, and in the end Stephen gave up the struggle. The last one I went to was a Charles Barr lecture on silent Hitchcock, which I guess would have been in early 2000. That was the final series.

Stephen now runs a publishing company: here is its website.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.