|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: What ever happened to "AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS" ?
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 04-20-2003 11:22 AM
Claude wrote:
quote: What was the sound format on the 35mm print that ran in London recently? Was it mono or four track mag? I doubt there are any Dolby A prints of this movie because it was never re released to theatres after Dolby Stereo was introduced.
Claude, I know this is going to sound silly, but I can't remember what sound format that print had.
If I remember correctly, it was shown as part of a festival of Technicolor prints at the NFT. I saw several films within a few days, some were stereo, some mono, but I can't remember which this was.
I do remember that I hadn't intended to go, but, at the last minute, I was able to get away from work early, and so, was able to see it. at the Box Office I was advised that the print they would be screening was a few minutes shorter than the version they hoped to obtain, but I don't know what was cut, I've only seen the film once before, on television, several decades ago.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Hauberg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 883
From: Malling, Denmark
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 04-21-2003 04:32 AM
Claude:
I think, the cut version of Around the World was a panic move from distributors, believing that the film only would have chances with very young audiences - who definitely would find it boring after seeing actionfilms, edited as vere they music-videos. CRUEL !! I too look foreward to the day, we see a completely restored film, prefereably in 70mm, but danish distributors hate that format. -Understandable, as only 3 or 4 theaters all still equipped for running. -And our good collegue Orla Nielsen of Aalborg is the only one, really to do something about it. I'm afraid it's hopeless to dream on. - But OK - a really class one Scope print with a set of dts discs would be nice too, and as it for sure never will be a 3.000+ prints release, it might just be something worth looking at, which is more than You can say about most film prints today. Second and third generation duplicates are not the prescription to hold onto audiences, if You ask me. Going on with this print quality, will only be another excuse for ordinary movie-goers to convert for dvd.
GWTW on the contrary, must still have an audience in most markets, without even the most commercially framed distributor being in doubt as to cut or not to cut... But please - never more a 70mm blow-up from that one. Love the film, but in the original 1,37 version please - no grain - no fake masking - no fake sound - and not 13 reels of push-up job twice a day !
You say somewhere, you don't understand someone are still drawling about the dying away 70mm -Don't You take out the Hasselblad now and then to special jobs, because You just love it - even if the digital stuff is fine ? We have seen some of Your great work in these forums, but i'm not the one to estimate, whether those pretty ladies or the impressing outdoors would have been better or not in digital versus the Hasselblad version. -Does it really get up there, when printing in large format ? - I sure am curious. I am still running around with a 20 year old Canon T-70, which fully covers my everyday needs, but somewhere in a closet sits a much older two-eyed middle-format Yashica 124-G - in a pro's eyes very much a plaything, i guess. I take it out once in a while and get really fine slides, -that is, if mother nature is with me, with bright sun and so...
This summer, it is four years since i had the last pair of worn 70mm prints running (Out of Africa and Baraka), -before those two it was the reissue of Spartacus ten years ago or so, but the DP's are ready, and so am i - still not to give up the hope !
Per
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|