Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World 70mm showing (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World 70mm showing
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-20-2003 09:32 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
the distributors just said don't use the 70mm word to protect themselves
To protect themselves from what? A lawsuit? This is ridiculous. Dolby (the company) does not own any trademarks or copyrights on the term "70mm" so there's no reason why a theatre couldn't advertise they were running a 70mm print if that was what they were in fact runnning. What's wrong with advertising simply, "70mm six-track stereo" or some variant of that? Which, of course, is what has been done in the years prior to the introduction of Dolby, as well as in modern-day cases where a 70mm print was either non-Dolby-encoded or when a Dolby print was played in a theatre with a Dolby-compatible, non-Dolby-brand cinema processor.

At any rate, I'm not disputing your claim that some 70mm presentations over the years went unadvertised, but, in my mind it seems foolish to have done so given the marquee value of the "70mm" term.

More specifically, Gordon, through your post are you suggesting that the two Arizona engagements of Star Wars being discussed in this thread were run in 70mm unadvertised? Was that the point of your post? Just wondering since I have information to the contrary.

How many Dolby-compatible, non-Dolby-brand cinema processors were on the market in 1977?

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-21-2003 07:55 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Over the years I've seen on marquees and in newspapers the wording. Presented in 70MM 6 Track Stereophonic Sound or 70MM 6 Track Stereo Sound for non-Dolby houses. For when 70MM Dolby prints were available but the house was not equipped.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-21-2003 09:28 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No Iam not disputing the arazona question
Since most newspaper ads in major citys are a block add listing all the theatres they in the past listed the 70mm DOLBY houses in one group and the rest by themselves underit.
In canada at least they never just marked it as stereo if someone elses processor was installed it was just listed with the mono theatres and the marque usually said presented in 70mm stereosound
In ontario there were about 14 Starscope 70 installs and about the same from UltraStereo and 8 or 9 Smart 70 systems and there newspaper adds were always grouped with the mono houses

Dolby has always been very lawyer happy in keeping there name protected and zealous in making sure it wasn't used with any non dolby product

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-23-2003 02:22 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Who can fingure out why the lawyers do what they do. When we ran the Harris restoration of MY FAIR LADY, we were specifically instructed that we could not use any photos of Audrey Hepburn in our ads or flyers. No one could explain why this was; we complied but it remains a mystery.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Cassidy
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 549
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 08-23-2003 04:46 AM      Profile for Paul Cassidy   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Cassidy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mid City Complex had the only remaining 70MM cinema , just before it closed they ran all the 70mm the could and the crowds came , 2001: A Space Odyssey, Ben Hur , Titanic and others .Some people have long memories when they see 70MM on any film advertised and know the are going to see something special [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Harris
Film Handler

Posts: 95
From: Bedford Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 08-23-2003 07:48 AM      Profile for Robert Harris   Email Robert Harris   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul,

I believe the concept of "no AH" photos was not precisely as it may have been explained to your venue.

As I recall, the problem was one of authority and of billing block legalities. As such, there apparently could not be a photo of Audrey without a corresponding photo of Rex. This entire situation did not seem to be size dependent, as long as Rex was there somewhere.

The one sheet was a perfect example of this syndrome.

RAH

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-24-2003 03:14 AM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, I did do some research in the AZ Daily Star up through August 1977. Star Wars opened in Tucson at the El Dorado on Fri August 17, 1977 I believe. (I went through the microfische at the Tucson Public Library). "Star Wars" replaced "A Bridge Too Far".

The newspaper ad did not list 70mm Dolby. However, it did list prints by both Deluxe and Technicolor and having been filmed in Panavision. So maybe this will give a clue?

As I previously stated, I saw this film 3 times at the El Dorado. Media coverage regarding this film was big news, and as I said, unless I am senile alltogether, that the marquee stated 70mm and that I had visited the booth and do remember this. But, I will see if some of the IATSE projectionists remember, maybe I am mistaken? If I am, then I stand corrected.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-24-2003 06:22 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Robert,

Very interesting. I guess all that was relevant when the film first came out but decades later even the distributor's bookers don't have a clue as to why the restrictions are there. The billing size issue makes perfectsense. Many times in the press books the credit lines are given percentages referenced against the point size of the title, so it would make sense that images of the stars would have relational issues attached to them also. Thanks for the enlightment.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Howard
Film Handler

Posts: 26
From: Huyton, Liverpool, UK
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 08-24-2003 08:32 AM      Profile for Paul Howard   Email Paul Howard   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Too bad they are always playing in california or the UK. When are we going to see some 5/70 up here dammit!

I was lucky enough to See all 4 Alien films at the Bradford film museum, as part of their fantastic films weekend a few weeks back.

Alien, Aliens and Alien 3 were 70mm blow ups, and all had very powerful 6 track sound. The print quality was excellent.

This leads me to think, where are all of the 70mm prints of Star Wars and Jaws, E.T, etc. the films everyone would love to see (on the big screen). How hard is it to obtain them.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-24-2003 03:16 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I did some research in the AZ Daily Star up through August 1977.
Will,
Why did you search only up through August??? I already stated in an earlier post that I had done a search through December 1977. I also stated that Tucson began their run of Star Wars in the film's 11th week of release, and that it did not open in 70mm (which is explained in plain-and-simple English in my articles also previously mentioned in this thread). Only a few markets opened the movie in 70; most large markets got their 70mm prints later in the run.

The thing is, Tucson simply wasn't a large market and not likely to get 70mm prints except on titles where a large print run was made. Following Star Wars, for instance, Tucson theatres didn't run Close Encounters Of The Third Kind or Superman in 70mm. And in 1979 and '80, when Alien and The Empire Strikes Back had then-record 70mm print runs and exclusive initial wave 70mm platform releases, Tucson still didn't play them. (They did play Empire in 70mm, but started it in its second wave release a month following the initial release.) To futher state my case, I also gave a bit of information on install dates related to Dolby cinema proessors in Tucson theatres, a piece of information you have failed to offer any comment on both here and in separate private emails.

quote:
Star Wars opened in Tucson at the El Dorado on Fri August 17, 1977 I believe.
And I think that claim is incorrect, too. I believe it opened August 5. Geez, how difficult is it to look up simple items like this??!!

quote:
The newspaper ad did not list 70mm Dolby.
Are you surprised??? See my previous comments re the 70mm release of Star Wars. The thing is, Star Wars is generally acknowledged as the movie that kickstarted a "comeback" of 70mm (as an exhibition format) BUT there weren't that many 70mm prints made for it despite what people may think they remember. It was the Star Wars sequels, The Empire Strikes Back and Return Of The Jedi, that had huge 70mm print runs that played in dozens of large and medium-size cities, and it is those two Star Wars movies whose 70mm experiences most people are likely to remember.

quote:
unless I am senile
Would you like me to respond to that? [Smile]

quote:
the marquee stated 70mm and that I had visited the booth and do remember this.
You also stated you were nine years old at the time, an age I find difficult to believe one would have a firm grasp of technical production and exhibition concepts. I also asked if it was possible that you were confusing your memories of seeing Star Wars in 1977 with that of Empire three years later? A memory that, in light of your most recent reply and Empire's 70mm status in Tucson, seems more and more likely.

quote:
But, I will see if some of the IATSE projectionists remember
Why? I've stated numerous times here that the concept of memory is overrated.

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-24-2003 06:09 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael,
I was in a mad rush this past Saturday when I hastily found the news ads in the AZ Daily Star microfische. I will double check the release date next time I go back to the Tucson Public Library Main which is about an hr away and the only pubblic library in town to have these archives. Sorry I did not have enough time to research more. Next time I'll arrange my personal schedule just to please you!

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-24-2003 06:36 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will Kutler wrote:
quote:
Star Wars opened in Tucson on Fri August 17, 1977
quote:
I was in a mad rush this past Saturday when I hastily found the news ads in the AZ Daily Star microfische. I will double check the release date next time I go back to the Library
Will,
Don't take it personally, but being in a mad rush is no excuse for doing sloppy work. I mean, the 17th of August wasn't even a Friday during the year 1977!

The opening release date isn't what is in question. To summarize my lengthy posts throughout this thread: if Tucson ran Star Wars in 70mm, they got the print later in its run.

[ 08-24-2003, 09:54 PM: Message edited by: Michael Coate ]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-25-2003 09:50 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was lucky enough to run a friends 70mm print of IAMMW in my basement screening room about 12 years ago. This print supposedly was then used to restore some of the lost scenes in the laser disk version.This print definatley had some of the stuff missing from other VHS versions of the time.

Shortly after that we tried to run it again but it had vinegared too badly to run through the JJ I had at the time. That original run is definately something I will never forget though. It was also corrected print for deep dish screens. The soundtrack was also quite good, and very dynamic.
Mark @ CLACO

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Harris
Film Handler

Posts: 95
From: Bedford Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 08-26-2003 07:24 PM      Profile for Robert Harris   Email Robert Harris   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark,

the laser was created using 70mm trims which had been excised from a print in early 1964.

If your friend's print has not yet gone to the land of "guitar picks" I'd be most interested, if at all possible, in taking a look at it.

RAH

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-28-2003 09:46 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Bob,
Not sure if he still has it but I will check and find out. He loaned it(supposedly for use in the laser disk creation) to a rather unscrouplous film collector that sometimes makes posts on this site. When his print was returned it had become pretty really vinegared and he was not actually sure that they had returned his actual print..... Pretty sad as it ran really good and did not have the slightest hint of vinegar syndrome that last time we ran it...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.