Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » FilmGuard: how to clean two prints with one Kelmar Cleaner? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: FilmGuard: how to clean two prints with one Kelmar Cleaner?
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-07-2003 06:14 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad, I am suing you for your explanation, even though it makes perfect sense to me.

Perhaps Chris is confused because he doesn't get why it would use more media if 2 prints were spliced together rather than threaded seperately. What Chris is not taking into account is that the media is rewound after each print. I think that right there is the reason for the confusion. If the media is not rewound, then it really wouldn't make a difference. But I would be hesitant to do that on two 2 hour features. The media is being chopped in half anyway by the user, and you do get more media used effectively that way.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 09-08-2003 01:38 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad's explanation stands on its own. You don't have a case, Joe! [Razz]

The platter comparison may have been confusing, but anyone who looks carefully at the takeup core on a kelmar cleaner should see that, because the core is turning at a constant speed, the media is pulled off of feed core faster as the takeup diameter increases.

I never asked about this, but I've wondered if the increasing media exposure applies more Filmguard to the end of the film pack than the start...

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-08-2003 04:09 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
The answer would be yes.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 09-08-2003 06:07 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, DUH! [Big Grin]

I don't know if this is a question or a comment, but I had a dirty print that I made up a cleaner for with FG. For some reason or another the cleaner didnt get put on for a couple of days. When I put it on, it seemed to clean up the dirt much better than when I use a cleaner when the FG was jsut applied. I would say it got off about 60 percent of the dirt on the first pass. Also, I noticed very little streaking on screen. In short, it did a lot better than normal.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.