Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Sondor "Soundhouse" (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Sondor "Soundhouse"
Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 03-23-2011 11:43 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I remember, in sync and this was a big selling point as the picture and sound would disappear together with film damage. This was deemed important by someone.

This also made it easier to do editorial like that matters now.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-23-2011 10:45 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Sam D. Chavez
Bobby, you're dreaming here.
Yes, I agree. But it's kind of fun. Hypothetically speaking it should be possible to create a penthouse mounted film reader that can see data for SRD, DTS and SDDS as well as dead formats like CDS or LC Digital and perhaps even digitally read the optical analog tracks too.

Regular movie theaters have had no need for this sort of thing because most did indeed only install one of the digital sound formats. It was rare to find a screen that had two or three digital sound formats installed.

35mm film is on its way out of first run movie theaters, but I don't see film being eliminated completely. Art house theaters, revival houses, colleges, etc. will still have a need for running film prints. What are they going to use to play the audio in the long run, like 10 or 20 years from now? If there's anything I know about digital hardware is it all breaks eventually and the companies making the hardware don't make replacement parts for very long at all. Theaters playing film prints could eventually be stuck playing the audio in analog once critical pieces of equipment fail.

A lot of the digital sound processing hardware that was so common in the 1990s and this past decade is already in the process of dying. I'm sure plenty of first and second generation Dolby and DTS processors have bitten the dust. Same for SDDS hardware. That format is at least comatose and heading for the grave since no new hardware for it has been made in several years.

If some custom, multi-purpose film reader can at least properly see the audio data on the print it might be able to send it to some type of digital audio processor or computer to decode the audio or use the film print data to sync audio from a hard disc drive.

DTS/DataSat has sort of tip-toed in that direction with their XD-10 and XD-20 processors. They not only decode the theatrical DTS format but can also decode home theater DTS and even the home theater variant of Dolby Digital. Why not add more audio formats to the mix?

quote: Sam D. Chavez
CDS was way hard to do as their own reader could not reliably read their track.
I wonder how much of the problem was due to film printing issues as opposed to issues with the reader. CDS audio had a bit rate of around 6 million bits per second. I'm sure there was some considerable challenge in getting the CDS data onto 70mm prints and 35mm prints consistently.

By comparison, on 35mm film Dolby Digital runs at only 1/12 the rate of CDS, around 550 kilobits per second. That includes all the error correction data; the actual DD track is encoded at only 320kb/s. The data is able to be printed at a larger, easier to read size, making it more robust at overcoming inconsistencies in film printing.

But if the real problem with CDS was its film reader we have had 21 years worth of advancements in LEDs and CCD/CMOS imaging chips. New technology could probably do a far better job of reading a CDS audio track if the CDS audio track was reproduced on the film print well enough.

quote: Sam D. Chavez
It had similarities as some of the same individuals designed it but it's a whole different unit, much more sophisticate and unlike CDS, it had some redundancy.
SDDS operates at a much lower bit rate than CDS, about 1.2 million bits per second (Sony Professional ATRAC codec). It has a primary digital track and a complete backup digital track as well as the analog track for final backup. And I have heard SDDS do the double-fail from primary digital to secondary digital to analog plenty of times -most often with very worn AMC Theaters policy snipes.

quote: Sam D. Chavez
One big difference was the bits are located on both sides of the film way outside the standard area reserved for soundtracks. It would be very difficult to adapt the SR.D penthouse reader to pick this off.
The sort of reader I'm hypothesizing would have to be an entirely new design, maybe something where the imaging pick-ups can be shifted to target different positions on the film print.

Obviously, this sort of idea will be rendered moot if movie studios decide to only distribute DCPs exclusively and push the film projectors of specialty theaters into moth balls or the trash heap.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 03-24-2011 06:26 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Future 35mm use will revert to analog and Dolby Digital, at most. Other formats, such as anything special, will fade and die. dts, in particular, will fail as discs are lost. Frankly, the others (cds & sdds) weren't that popular even at their peak and suffer from lack of factory support.

The real failure point of 35mm will be the lack of support (factory, dealer, and technician) as these people retire and die. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-24-2011 08:28 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually Louis, I have more high hopes for DTS/Datasat than for Dolby Digital.

How many decoders are there for Dolby Digital? Right now...just the CP650. The DA20/CP500 are pretty long discontinued and lord only knows how long they will be repairable.

As for DTS...there are more of those discs out there being horded than you can imagine...also, it isn't a real trick to recreate them or even port the technology to a discless based one. Likewise...the decoding scheme won't be all that tricky. In fact, I could see a day when digital for film will also be a PCM track running off of a non-special computer with the audio files sent in just like for DCinema. Storage space just isn't all that big a deal anymore...all that would be left is syncing the projector to the player...a DTS type time code would be quite handy...if you don't have a pulse-tach set up already.

-Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Gordon
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 580
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Aug 2005


 - posted 03-24-2011 08:35 AM      Profile for Paul Gordon   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Gordon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree, DTS discs can be copied easily, uploaded to hard drives, the DTS processors themselves are very basic boxes, that seem to keep on chugging. Just look at all the people still using the DTS6! Dolby Digital blows for older, dirty, splicy prints, it will always drop to analog.

quote: Steve Guttag
As for DTS...there are more of those discs out there being horded than you can imagine...also, it isn't a real trick to recreate them or even port the technology to a discless based one. Likewise...the decoding scheme won't be all that tricky. In fact, I could see a day when digital for film will also be a PCM track running off of a non-special computer with the audio files sent in just like for DCinema. Storage space just isn't all that big a deal anymore...all that would be left is syncing the projector to the player...a DTS type time code would be quite handy...if you don't have a pulse-tach set up already.


 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-24-2011 10:07 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
How many decoders are there for Dolby Digital? Right now...just the CP650. The DA20/CP500 are pretty long discontinued and lord only knows how long they will be repairable.
I assume Dolby's CP750 only works with digital projection setups. The diminishing support for digital sound processes on 35mm film may indeed push digital sound playback for film onto hard discs in computers or devices like a DTS/DataSat XD-20. A hard disc would allow uncompressed Linear PCM 5.1 playback. That sort of thing would be very do-able for old prints with DTS time code.

Then there's the issue of many 1990s movies using only one digital sound process exclusively. The ones with DTS only, such as Jurassic Park or Schindler's List wouldn't be such a big deal. But dozens of movies were released only in SDDS/SR (such as Desperado) or SRD only (such as The Lion King or The English Patient). Without any working digital sound film reader and processor to decode the audio track the 35mm film print will be stuck playing audio in analog. An up to date reader that could at least properly see the data on the print could give a computer system an opportunity to process it.

Another question I thought about: what's more likely to fail first, the film reader or the digital sound processor? Are the connection standards they're using obsolete? For instance if one had an old Dolby Digital reader that still worked would there be any way to connect it to a computer system to process Dolby Digital data on a film print?

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 03-24-2011 11:08 AM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
The diminishing support for digital sound processes on 35mm film may indeed push digital sound playback for film onto hard discs in computers or devices like a DTS/DataSat XD-20. A hard disc would allow uncompressed Linear PCM 5.1 playback. That sort of thing would be very do-able for old prints with DTS time code.
This is why I always loved DTS. Sure, Dolby Digital is convenient now but way down the road, DTS is completely viable and upgradable. Even with film dying for first runs, places like ours are going to continue to run this stuff I'm sure for years to come. Sadly, we don't have DTS installed...just a CP650.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-24-2011 11:54 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dolby Digital always put the "brains" of the system in the processor. The output from the reader is a video signal, of sorts. As such, one would have to come up with a unique input module to use a computer to try and "read" the soundrack.

DTS...on the other hand...is just a pulse track...big deal. It is so basic, I've handled 16mm movies were they merely recorded the time code on the 16mm analog track...hook the 16mm preamp output to the timecode input and it worked (DTS did make a buffer board that would clean the signal and get well defined edges on the pulse).

Sony has always split the brains up between the reader and the player with the player having the bulk of the work.

-Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 03-24-2011 06:21 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So. . . sr wins by default. Future 35mm will be analog. Louis

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.