Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » non-theatrical 35mm (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: non-theatrical 35mm
Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-10-2003 06:15 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ernamann used to have something similar for the ernamann 8b

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 11-11-2003 03:52 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hugh said, "We therefore had use of the 35mm arc lamp, and projection optics"

Sounds fascinating - how was the 35mm head removed? Did it swing away or was it lifted off?

Getting (way) back to Aileen, if you're reading this, could you raise the money for a Kinoton FP38E? It's a long-term investment. When the outlay is viewed over say, ten to fifteen years (or more) it doesn't look so bad! It'd be the best of all worlds - superb projection in both formats, and not just for legacy reduction prints from 35mm, but also for short films etc. shot on 16mm. Is there filmmaking activity in your college?

(NB 16mm is still desirable at least over here as an alternative shooting / printing format for short films and documentaries. Not everyone wants the look of DVCAM / DVCPro / DV / DigiBeta etc. origination / projection. Also, digital sound developments for 16mm have somewhat stayed its "execution"!)

BTW I also know the Hokushin X-600 very well, always thought highly of it, its sound reproduction is excellent (even better when followed by an audio compressor, noise gate etc. in the signal path). Sounds very like the image size might be way too big given the number of seats.

The only bugbear is the pressure plate framing device, where you also have to adjust the machine tilt! Oh well - you can't have everything.

 |  IP: Logged

Hugh McCullough
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 147
From: Old Coulsdon, Surrey, UK
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 11-11-2003 05:18 PM      Profile for Hugh McCullough   Author's Homepage   Email Hugh McCullough   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was a long time ago Brian, but I seem to remember that the Kalee gate assembly was removed, and the bracket for the 16mm put in it's place.
The 16mm mech was then slotted onto this bracket with the gate in line with the lens/arc centre line. Oh! how I wish I had taken some photos.

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Jaro
Film Handler

Posts: 74
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 11-12-2003 01:10 PM      Profile for Matthew Jaro   Author's Homepage   Email Matthew Jaro   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A major problem is that some "art" movies are just not available in 35mm. For example, I have an IB print of "The Red Desert". Similarly, some French films like the Marius, Fanny and Cesar trilogy are probeably very difficult to get on 35mm. In these cases, I feel that the 16mm prints are still far superior to video. This may change with the next generation of projectors to be cheap enough to afford (DLP three chip, ultra XGA resolution with a 16x9 matrix).

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 11-12-2003 03:58 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you move outside the area of feature films, there is still a lot of 16mm being shown.

Yesterday I attended one of the regular Huntley Archives shows at the Fairfield Halls in Croydon, on the Southern outskirts of London. These shows used to be monthly, until the illness and recent death of John Huntley the founder of the archive, but are to be continued on a less frequent, but still several shows per year basis, by various other presenters; yesterdays show was presented by Johns son-in-law.

These shows are on various subjects, London cinemas and music halls, railways, famous local musicians, Croydon Airport etc. These shows are relatively inexpensive to put on, and attract good audiences. Last nights show was in the Ashcroft Theatre, the smaller of the two auditoria, and was getting on for full, something over 400 people I would think, at 7 pounds, about $10, per seat. Some shows have been in the larger Concert Hall, which seats just under 2000, and I have seen it almost half full. About 75% of the material shown at these events is on 16mm, many shows, including last nights, are entirely 16mm. The Concert Hall is fully equipped for both gauges, the Ashcroft Theatre has to use a Bell and Howell Marc 300 portable when they need 16mm.

On Monday I am heading up to Sheffield, (Full Monty land), to the Library Theatre, for an evening of transport documentaries. This is a smaller venue, probably seating about 250-300. It used to show film, and last year when I was there, the 35 and 16mm machines were still in the box, but non-operational. The venue is now used normally only as a live theatre, and another Marc 300 portable is brought in for the show. This is an annual event every November, and last year it was just about full. The year before somewhat less so, but the weather was poor. Still well over 75% full. I can't remember the ticket price, somewhere around 5 pounds , $7 ish, I think. A similar event is held in December, but I haven't been to that, so I don't know how well it does.

No venue is going to run these sort of shows every night, but they can be put on several times per year, and make good money. There are plenty of current feature films which do not attract audiences of anything like this size. They couldn't be done without 16mm capability.

If I was going to open a cinema (highly unlikely) I would install, in order of priority:

Two 35mm machines.

Video projector with Beta-SP, DV, U-Matic, DVD and VHS.

One 16mm machine, double band if possible.

Other video formats including Digi-Beta and Laserdisc. All video equipment to be multi-standard.

70mm, nice to have, but little product available.

Digital cinema projector, at the bottom of the list at present due to high cost and limited product availability.

Of course, things can change, a few years ago I would have put 16mm ahead of any video format.

 |  IP: Logged

Aileen D'Esposito
Film Handler

Posts: 11
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 11-12-2003 04:16 PM      Profile for Aileen D'Esposito   Email Aileen D'Esposito   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
brian, in your experience with the hokushin x-600, have you had any problems with keeping the image steady? I think over all problems i've had in running 16mm films on it, that has been the biggest. It gets to be almost sickening at times. The worst time was when we showed "Gummo" but i think that was partially in fault of the print. It has been to the point of unbearable though with prints that seem to be perfectly ok.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 11-12-2003 07:10 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Aileen

Sounds like the claw mechanism is out of adjustment, or if not, the bottom loop is being set incorrectly by the auto thread mechanism. The projector is very sensitive to incorrect loop sizes, and I recall a situation where the machine I was using was consistently making the lower loop too large. In that instance the sync went noticeably out, since the loop was so big, however it only needs to be a frame or two bigger to start jumping in the gate. Likewise, it's possible the autothread is setting the top loop too large also, or too small.

Try threading up a film, run it as normal for a few seconds, then stop and carefully count the number of frames between the gate and the soundhead. For 16mm optical, there should be 26 frames from the gate to the soundhead. Start counting from the frame that is in the gate and end at the frame that is directly opposite the soundhead. (You will actually get 27, but this OK because the frame that is in the gate and the frame opposite the soundhead are counted as half frames).There are other ways of checking this, but they aren't as accurate.

The top loop should be big enough so that the film is vertical just as it is going into the gate. Try adjusting by one frame larger or smaller and see if that helps.

If none of the above apply, then it's most likely the claw mechanism. You could also check the alignment of the pressure plate, though I haven't had a problem with these before. Nevertheless, since it slots in and out for cleaning, it may have become slightly misaligned.

Hope this helps, it is a very well designed machine and should be very steady and quiet.

Thanks for enlightening me re. the Debrie / Kalee Hugh - and interesting to hear the type of 16mm programming being screened in the UK Stephen. It's also great that John Huntley's wonderful work is being continued.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.