Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » I've Never Used FILMGUARD (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: I've Never Used FILMGUARD
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-01-2004 03:24 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just started using my first shipment of the latest type of media pads, and on my lower set of rollers, the #%$ media won't track properly after about half-way through the movie. They run fine for about an hour, then start to go sideways. If I don't keep pushing the media back into line, it winds out past the end of the takeup shaft and eventually falls off of the film-contacting roller. If it wasn't happening halfway thru the roll, I'd think the takeup roller was out of line, but WTF??

I'll try to get a picture of this phenom tomorrow and post it. Anyone else had this happen?

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-01-2004 03:29 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
back when we were using the stuff, this would sometimes happen. it seemed to correlate with how well the new media was initially wound onto the core. as i got more adept at doing this, it happened less often. my impression is that another generic brand of media (possibly cpi?) performed a little bit better in this regard.

curious how it would wind fine for a while before going apeshit. can't explain that part.

carl

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-01-2004 03:58 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike, do the cores you have say "Film-Tech" on them?

Also, are you sure you are taping the lead end down straight?

Finally, have you checked to make sure the cleaner is indeed lined up straight with the projector?

CPI does not make media. We have also seen terrible winding and scratching issues from Big Sky media samples recently.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 03-01-2004 09:08 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is FG not to be used on mag prints?

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 03-01-2004 10:53 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
We have also seen terrible winding and scratching issues from Big Sky media samples recently
Does Big Sky know about this? They've been pretty responsive lately to any issues I've brought up with them.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-01-2004 01:16 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad- I haven't looked closely at the cores but they should say Film-Tech, since they came out of a Film-Tech sealed box! (I bought'em from Claco.)

The cleaner is platter-mounted.

I might have gotten the end of this roll on a bit crooked. I'll try another roll and report back.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-01-2004 03:38 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
FG is fine on mag prints. You will see better reproduction when using it.

Big Sky is not our product. We had some reports that came in last fall of seeing scratches and they were all traced back to BS media. The scratching stopped when they used some FT media samples we traded them for some BS media samples. Indeed our own tests found scratching on those pads was an issue. But again, not our product.

About 6 months ago we switched over to a new core which has "Film-Tech" printed into the core itself. The new core has a slightly different design to aleviate winding issues. Depending on dealer stock and the luck of the draw, it is possible some people are still receiving the older cores. Most dealers should be completely switched over or very close to being phased out of the older cores.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-12-2004 01:04 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So... what about flipping the media and using the other side of the pads? Not reccomended?

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-12-2004 01:29 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would assume the key issue is whether the media pads get loaded with enough abrasive dirt that they risk scratching the film. A really large hard particle could "poke through" to the other side. Scratching from a buildup of abrasive dirt particles was always a risk when the media cleaners were run dry.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-12-2004 02:16 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Flipping the pads over doesn't do much simply because the "clean" side is winding up against the "dirty" side anyway.

If you are running the media dry, never, ever reuse the media, flip it over, rewind it, etc. You can only get more passes out of it if you are running the media with FG.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-13-2004 07:33 AM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have nothing but praise for Filmguard and it does exactly what it claims. I run 9 vic 5's and no longer get any buildup in the gate or runners and no dust. The prints look as good as the first run. We've just finished running ROTK from December 16 until last Thursday and the rpint was ecellent.

The only thing I will not do is re use the media pads. However I can get nearly eight hours out of each new set of pads....

After each feature I cut off the used length and throw it away. The take-up roller is run at a constant speed so as the media is taken up the diameter increases and the speed the media is pulled through increases. Cutting it off after each faeture ensures the slowest, safest speed and longest run time.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-19-2004 01:27 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ken -- Good point! The thought had crossed my mind, but it's true that you may be using more media than necessary as the takeup roll gets fuller/pulls faster.

Brad -- I would only consider flipping the pads to use at the makeup table on a heavily soiled used print, just to get the "bulk" off of it. And only if we're completely out of clean/new pads, as we are now, and as have been "ordered" for the past three months. (according to he who places orders) [Embarrassed]

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.