Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Print changes theatres-what's easiest? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Print changes theatres-what's easiest?
John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-04-2004 10:33 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think you're missing Brad's point.

If you don't trust the other theatre, then you want to receive the print on the largest reels/transport possible, so they don't have the chance to damage the print during breakdown.

You'll still need to go and check/remake all their splices, but at least you'll have the confidence that they didn't damage the print during breakdown.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 05-05-2004 12:04 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm with Scott and Leo on this... with a small addition.
When we were circuiting prints from a local chain house to our drive-in, we generally got prints that were totally trashed. It was kind of wierd, but I refused to accept any further circuits from that theatre (owned by a very large national chain).

Now, the drive-in is very close, or on the break, so it's not as big a deal. The only local circuits we do is from our own indoor, so I'm comfortable circuiting on large reels & not having to pay too much attention to the splices. In that sense, knowing where and from whom you're getting your circuits can make a difference.

 |  IP: Logged

Bruk Mogos
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: USA
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 05-05-2004 09:00 PM      Profile for Bruk Mogos   Email Bruk Mogos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The easiest and best way to move the print is Break it down onto 2 X 6000ft reels,in this case you can exchange 2x60k reels for their 2x6k reels with the movie, and it's simple any easy for you to inspect and mount the print.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-06-2004 03:29 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the theatre is right down the street why not just set up rollers on top of strategically placed cars and run it down to your booth via interlock? [Big Grin]

If no cars are available, just let it run along the ground. After all, film is practically indestructible Mylar now. [Eek!]

The above methods will not work if the theatres are more than a mile apart.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-06-2004 03:42 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"MYLAR" is a trademark of DuPont, who no longer makes motion picture film. Kodak's trade name is "ESTAR" base.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-06-2004 03:54 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've always found that 'polyester' does the job...

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-06-2004 03:58 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Unfortunately, "polyester" conjures up visions of leisure suits like the ones Phil used to wear, and not just great films. [Wink]

Another major user of polyester is the packaging industry (in the USA, plastic containers with the recycling symbol "1" in the triangle, or "PETE").

http://www.ultrapac.com/PETE%20Recycling.htm

quote:
PETE recycling is a major industry
The recycling of PETE containers has become a major success story in the plastic industry. The use of PETE for containers has been nothing less than phenomenal, and the growth of recycling is equally impressive.
As impressive as the growth of recycling statistics are, the demand for recycled PETE and recycler capacity far exceed the supply of post-consumer containers.
About three-fourths of reclaimed PETE is used to make products such as fibers for carpet, fiberfill, apparel and geotextiles. Much of the remainder is extruded into sheet for thermoforming, stretch blow-molding or compounded for molding applications.

http://recycling.stanford.edu/recycling/caq_plastic.html

quote:
Q: What type of plastic containers can be recycled?
A: The Stanford Recycling Center only accepts #1 PETE and #2 HDPE plastic containers. Look for the number inside three chasing arrows on the bottom of the container and lids. Please remember to remove plastic lids and place them in the garbage. Rinse and flatten container before putting in the recycling bin. All of other plastics should be reused or thrown in the garbage.

Back to CAQ
Q: What does PETE and HDPE stand for?
A: These names are acronyms for the type of plastic or resin they are made of. PETE stands for Polyethylene Terephthalate. It is commonly used in plastic soda bottles. HDPE stands for High Density Polyethylene. It is commonly used to make milk and juice jugs.



 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.