Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » TROY shedding dust - lab problem? (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: TROY shedding dust - lab problem?
John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-21-2004 08:39 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The first photo looks like the lab splice was poorly made, and hung up in the printer, causing the tear and misalignment of the image. I agree with you that the second clip seems to have jumped a sprocket.

I will send these photos to Kodak's technical expert in Rome, who will review them with the lab there.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-21-2004 10:04 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is from the LAB?!

Antonio, you will have to teach me how to cuss in Italian! That's the biggest piece of merda I have ever seen come fresh out of a lab!

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-22-2004 12:13 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I have seen this half a dozen times over the years here from US labs. Usually it's not that bad, but close to what Antonio posted.

Just all the more reason to hand inspect everything before you put it through a projector.

 |  IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-22-2004 08:05 PM      Profile for Antonio Marcheselli   Author's Homepage   Email Antonio Marcheselli   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad,
Film-Tech forum permits "merda"? [Wink]

Well, this is the first time I receive a new copy damaged in this way... But unfortunately a big part of new copy results scratched (The scratches are to leaders too!).

More, our copy of Troy are causing trouble since they're leaving too much dirt on gate so the focus changes during the movie...

John,
Feel free to send the photo to the lab. I imagine that, in a way or in another, the lab will know the source and they will contact my boss and it will be a mess... [Smile] But if this can contribute to have better prints... let's do it!
Let me know the results!

Bye!
A

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Case
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Sydney NSW Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 05-24-2004 01:59 AM      Profile for Dominic Case   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When problems arise with prints, it's helpfulfor the labs to get the feedback, so that any problems that arise from there can be addressed. However, on the other hand, it's hard for labs to respond to theatres directly: after all, we supply prints to our customer, the distributor. That's where complaints should come from.

Trouble is of course that there is every chance that any technical decriptions of problems will be totally scrambled and lost before the message gets through to someone technical in the lab. However, any problem report, whoever it goes to (even to John) must include some specific details: title, reel number, manufacturer of stock (look at the edge prints), lab if known (sometimes prints arrive in the lab's packaging), and if it can be found, the copy number (some lab packaging might show this too).

As John says, labs don't switch over to a lower cost production line - or to a lower quality production line. It's simply not the way it works. Comments that labs are instructed to cut corners to save time are usually indicative of the enormous pressure put on us by the distributors to get more and more prints out in shorter and shorter timeframes. If only there were corners to cut!

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-24-2004 05:52 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i believe pytlak has mentioned that sometimes labs will continuously print internegatives, rather than step-printing on shorter pitch stock. this will save time but introduce unsteadiness in the image. sounds like cutting corners to me. not that that would cause the shedding problems, though.

carl

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.