my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » SDDS and EX??? (Page 2)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: SDDS and EX??? Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-21-2004 08:24 AM                        Why I Don't Play Trailers In Digital: 1. Trailers are invariably mixed too loud, and playing the optical track (in SR, without subwoofer, at a lower-than-7.0-level--easy to set up as a custom format on the CP500) provides a sort of natural compressor/limiter. Quiet sounds don't become inaudible as they would in a digital track with greater dynamic range, and loud sounds don't blast the audience members out of their seats. I have no problem with blasting the audience members out of their seats during a well-mixed action film, but I do have a problem with trailers that are louder than the feature. 2. Not all trailers or features are available with digital tracks, and playing trailers in SR and the feature in SR (or A or mono, as appropriate) provides greater consistency to the presentation. This is especially true with limited-release art-house titles, but also applies to some mainstream titles. Trailers shouldn't sound noticeably better than features. 3. Many of the venues where I am likely to show film don't have digital capability, anyway. Some are still mono. If every piece of film that I handled had a playable digital track and every venue were capable of reproducing digital sound reliably and if trailers were mixed in a more reasonable way, then I might feel differently.  |  IP: Logged Scott Jentsch Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1061 From: New Berlin, WI, USA Registered: Apr 2003 posted 05-21-2004 03:55 PM                        quote: Why I Don't Play Trailers In Digital: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre trailer must have been very unimpressive in your theaters, then... (That's the most recent trailer I can remember that took full advantage of split surrounds) quote: Brad Miller For final clarification, "ES" does the same thing that "EX" does. Actually, isn't Dolby Digital EX matrixed, and DTS ES discrete? According to Dolby: The system uses 5.1-channel Dolby Digital and delivers an additional surround channel by mixing the signal into the left surround and right surround channels using a process called matrix encoding. And according to DTS: DTS-ES encodes a 6.1 input (L, C, R, Ls, Cs, Rs, LFE) to provide simultaneously both a discrete 6.1 bitstream and a downmixed 5.1 bitstream that is backward compatible with existing decoders. In theory, this should result in a slightly better Center Surround channel. However, in my experience, the back channel has never been much of a noticeable factor in the films I've seen in theaters. This is most likely due to the fact that I'm pretty far away from that back channel since I don't like to sit too far up in the stadium seating auditoriums around here. Now, home theater is a completely different animal. Watching Gladiator in DTS-ES with a good home system was a very good example of putting that back surround to good use. (Movie theaters can't afford to keep losing to home theaters like this)  |  IP: Logged Dean Kollet Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 591 From: Florida State University Registered: Jul 2003 posted 05-21-2004 04:16 PM                     From what I read...it is saying that the channel is encoded onto the 5.1 Audio track so that it's backwards compatible, and if you have the EX decoder, it will pick it up. It's not just matrixing the surround channels to make a new channel. Sort of the way SR is on a Stereo Print right? quote: Scott Jentsch (Movie theaters can't afford to keep losing to home theaters like this) Well, a good tuned Home Theatre will sound amazing, but then again the rear speakers commonly set WAY too loud just so people can hear it. And as far as Video....how are Movie Theatres losing to Home Theatres..... A Properly set up Movie Theatre (of the right size of course) will blow away many Home Theatres (unless you are spending the same amount at Home as you would in the Movie Theatre)  |  IP: Logged Claude S. Ayakawa Film God Posts: 2738 From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 05-21-2004 05:47 PM                        I had an opportunity to see "GLADIATOR" at the Waikiki #1 a few months before it closed and the the digital sound in that auditorium was SDDS-8 with a Dolby EX unit. According to the operator, the EX was engaged and the presentation as usual was awesome but the rear speaker sound was very weak. Because the Waikiki' had a 60 foot screen, I always tried to seat as close to the rear as possible whenever I saw an EX presentation there. The home video presentation on the other hand was a total different aural experience. I have the DTS-ES 6.1 DVD and the rear surround sound is very powerful. I also think the home video version is more powerful than the theatrical presentation with a much stronger LFE in addition to the discrete rear surround track . -Claude  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 05-21-2004 06:43 PM                     quote: Claude S. Ayakawa I also think the home video version is more powerful than the theatrical presentation with a much stronger LFE in addition to the discrete rear surround track . NEWSFLASH - it ain't the DVD! I think you are forgetting that no two rooms and no two systems will sound the same. For instance, I was at a theater I service yesterday that was running Van Helsing in a JBL auditorium and another auditorium with Klipsch speakers. (The Klipsch were put in before I started servicing this location, so don't blame me!) The JBL auditorium sounded absolutely phenomenal, and the Klipsch auditorium sounded bland and extremely weak in the low frequencies. This is par for the course, as Klipsch speakers have never had a really good low end and are a lousy choice for cinema sound. I tuned both of those houses with the same gear and everything about the auditoriums and sound racks are identical, except for the speakers. The mix of Van Helsing was fine, it was just the substandard choice of loudspeakers killing the presentation in the Klipsch auditorium. I also have a unique situation of being able to play a SRD / DTS / SDDS 35mm presentation in my screening room and A/B comparing it to the 5.1 DVD playing alongside it. While many DVDs have a little bit different mix to compensate for the typical home video system, (and yes there is a higher bitrate for you super nerds who are only interested in numbers), the 35mm sound is always either a tie, or preferred to the DVD sound by everyone who has heard the side by side tests. Simply put, the blame for the Waikiki #1 presentation was either a poor choice of speakers, poor tuning or a little bit of both. It is also possible that your home video system is not properly calibrated as well, with too much LFE and your surrounds turned up too high. Either that or a combination of everything in this paragraph combined. (BTW, anyone want to buy some Klipsch speakers?)  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-21-2004 07:55 PM                     Which klipsch speakers are they, perhaps La Scallas and no subwoofer? Its hard to type Klipsch as I don't have a lisp to my typing! Actually Kilipsh speakers can and will sound excellent when EQ'd with the R-2. They also HAVE TO be mated with a horn loaded Subwoofer to sound their best... to help keep the LF stuff in phase. I would definately say that its an inproperly designed system on top of what ever else may be wrong. In the past I have installed tons (literally because they're VERY heavy)of Klipsch speaker systems along with the aid of an unnamable person we are not allowed to mention on this site. These systems to my ears always had a boomy bottom end and definate lack of high frequencies, especially the extreme highs. I also have had quite a few opportunities to confirm that exact audible effect I get when I listen to them. HOWEVER....they can be tuned to sound really good if you use the R-2. I've owned and tried several other analyzers with single and multiple mics and they simply don't work like the R-2 does on these speakers for what ever reason. I tuned a set of them last January and the before and after results were way more than dramatic, all of the people at this location also thought the difference was nothing short of phenominal. I have these graphs saved on my laptop and wish I could post them here... Will see if I can print and then scan them if possible. NOTE: I do not advocate purchasing or installing these speakers any longer.... Its been 15 years since I installed my last pair.... There are other speaker systems today that are far, far better. Mark  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 05-22-2004 07:23 AM                     Scott J. asks, "Actually, isn't Dolby Digital EX matrixed, and DTS ES discrete?" No. Theatrical DTS-ES is matrixed, just like SRD-EX. Discrete DTS-EX exists for home theatre DVDs only. --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Scott Jentsch Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1061 From: New Berlin, WI, USA Registered: Apr 2003 posted 05-24-2004 12:02 PM                        John, You are correct. I double-checked the documents that I referenced, and the DTS doc did mention DVD and home presentations. Wanting to confirm that theatrical ES was matrix, I went digging on DTS' site and found a press release that said About DTS-ES DTS-ES is a 6.1 matrixed system enabling cinemas to deliver extreme spatial effects that quite literally surround the audience. The 19” rack mounting DTS-ES decoder creates a back surround channel from encoded surround tracks, in typical theatre applications feeding a Back Surround (BS) speaker array (configured as left-back-wall and right-back-wall for stereo operation). http://www.dtsonline.com/cinema/press-article.php?ID=1149094120&yID=2003&cID= quote: Dean Kollet And as far as Video....how are Movie Theatres losing to Home Theatres..... Well, for many reasons. The fact that DTS-ES has a discrete back surround channel on DVD instead of matrixed on theatrical release is just one. The fact that studios often make much more on video than they do during theatrical release is another. Capitalism dictates that businesses go where the money is, and shortened release windows and composition with an eye towards the home market are just a few signs of that fact. Currently, the most significant advantage that theaters have is exclusivity of the product. Pirates and file-swappers are eroding that advantage as well. The good news is that theaters have the ability to make the complete movie-going experience better than home theaters, and also show how putrid bootlegged and swapped versions of movies really are. But that's digressing from the original topic of this thread. Very few theaters, in my experience, do anything to advertise that they are showing a movie in EX of any variety. Their box office does not indicate sound formats, the auditorium entrance does not display the sound format, and god-forbid a theater should show a sound format trailer these days. The BigScreen Cinema Guide (my site) has the ability to show all the digital sound formats and the ES/EX varieties. I can't remember the last time a theater indicated anything beyond Dolby or DTS, and mostly they just say "Digital Sound". I didn't even bother creating an SDDS-8 graphic, since we only have one theater listed which has SDDS-8 capability, and they never indicated it in their showtimes. The formats BigScreen can indicate: http://www.bigscreen.com/Help.php?id=7 Dolby's site lists many, many theaters here in Wisconsin that are EX-equipped. It's very unfortunate that these theaters are not taking advantage of the opportunity provided to them to advertise to their customers of that capability. By using technology such as ES/EX and 5 screen channels, and using them to augment a flawless picture presentation, theaters have the ability to invest more money than consumers ever could in their home systems. I heard at one point that a height channel was being explored, but I don't recall where or who was involved. That's something that would be very difficult for most to try in their home. However, the home system I'm building right now will eclipse the sound performance of most of the theaters within driving distance. The projector will also deliver a sharper and more stable image than what is common in theaters, with a black level that is pretty comparable, if not a little better. Like I said, studios will follow the money, and that means that theaters will continue to be squeezed to compete with home video. Right now, a theatrical run is still deemed necessary to make a video release a success, but how long will that last? It's largely a marketing and PR challenge that can be overcome given the motivation and budget. From the DTS web site, only 2 movies in theaters are in DTS-ES (Alamo, LOTR:ROTK) and Harry Potter is the only upcoming movie with ES. Unfortunately, Dolby doesn't differentiate their EX movies. Are there any sources for that information for upcoming films? I think BigScreen is a bit of a rarity among sites that list showtimes for theaters regardless of corporate affiliation (Yahoo, Hollywood.com, etc.) in that we try to help theaters with that aspect. Usually, all they display is "Digital Sound" if anything. Are there examples of theaters that do publicity right?  |  IP: Logged Alan Haigh Film Handler Posts: 45 From: Watford, UK Registered: Jul 2003 posted 05-24-2004 03:24 PM                    I hate to break it to you, but Harry Potter is not ES/EX. No tears now...  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 05-24-2004 05:38 PM                     But what about the IMAX DMR sound mix? Seriously, are the two edited in-sync so you could actually port the sound from one to the other, technical and legal issues aside? --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-24-2004 06:38 PM                     IMAX is a L-C-R LS RS system with the added top channel which I doubt they use for DMR and the sub is a bass management sum of the mix  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.