Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » CYAN DYE tracks FACTS OR FICTION (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: CYAN DYE tracks FACTS OR FICTION
Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-25-2004 05:28 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gordon & Peter, I don't think Frank is saying he has a Kalee model '1' projector, did such a model even exist.

He in fact says he has '1' Kalee projkector used in a drive in!

It would help if he was to give the model number.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-25-2004 05:50 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John, just what is the effect of the IR flooding through? Seems to me that it would just create a constant DC offset on the solar cell output which would be eliminated by the differential input of the preamp.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-25-2004 06:45 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IR flooding through would definately bias the input differential and not necessarily be cancled out just because it is a differential pair... and not all preamps use a differential pair input anyway.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-25-2004 07:36 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The old Ballantine 6/4/1/ solid state system had transformer input to the optical preamplifier. The current from the solar cell would saturate the core of the little transformer and so we had to insert a capacitor to isolate the DC component from the signal input.

This method of DC removal is very effective. In low impedance circuits you have to use a large capacitance to transmit the low frequencies.

KEN

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-25-2004 08:10 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
except the old Ballantine 6/4/1 solid state sound system was a bitch at the best of times to service and as they got older keep working

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-25-2004 08:29 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suspect that since over half of the energy from a tungsten lamp is in the infrared, and there is no silver to modulate it, you could easily drive the cells to near saturation.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Jerkic
Film Handler

Posts: 77
From: Ayr Queensland Australia
Registered: May 2004


 - posted 05-25-2004 09:50 PM      Profile for Frank Jerkic   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Jerkic   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good day again

The Century's I own are fitted with the TR4B sound reproducer, one has never been converted to stereo (same as it left the factory) the other was changed to stereo by moving the exciter light to the end where the solar cell was originally fitted.

The Kalee soundhead is the 890 which is stereo for the drive in, the solar cell runs straight into a preamp-FM STEREO transmitter, The Drive in went Stereo years ago and our first Stereo movi was WILLOW

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-26-2004 10:48 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve -
Yes, it is close to $1000, but you never need to replace any LEDs...

Ken -
I have never seen a Kalee 1 - even City Screen didnt use gear that old - but I have run Kalee 2s in NZ so I assumed that there was an older brother. Or maybe Kalee has emerged from the ashes and is taking a leaf out of the Star Wars book and releasing #3 before #1 (or 19/20/21/37 before 1).. Maybe it's a new model !!!

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-26-2004 02:22 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter,

Kalee 11 is the oldest I've used..... I was just pointing out that I don't think he has a model 1!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-26-2004 08:31 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter,

I know on Ernemanns I've had to replace lasers...they were more expensive than the LEDs

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-27-2004 08:36 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I've had the same ecperience with the Ernemanns - we use a different laser.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-27-2004 09:42 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only ernamann lasers I have had to replace were with Xetron consoles and it was felt that the RF from the ignitors had caused the failures as they had also failures of the MCU in the TA10 automations mounted in the same consoles

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-28-2004 09:05 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting Gordon - I think you are onto something. The Erneman ones we have changed were on Ernemann 15s, which I believe borrowed a lot from the Xetron lhouses. Also all but one failure we have had were of lasers in l-houses with bad electrical installations, and the one exception was for a broken lens cover where the processor manufacturer's tech (doing a line up for a premiere) broke it.

Which could bring me to another discussion thread on the frustration of the toos and froos of a processor manufacturer's tech "lining up" a theatre with a single mic in 5 minutes (prior to a premiere etc) and drastically changing settings made over hours of work with a R2 or similar.. And the theatre sounded like poo.. (we now xerox the C64s on a 55/65/200 so that the theatre can hit the "undo" button - easier on a 500 or 650 of course) I had one such tech tell me that he needed to roll off the bass to compensate for tube train noise breaking thru to the theatre...

Ken - fair point. Maybe the machine is so old that the first 1 of the 11 has worn off !

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-28-2004 09:25 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter for several houses that I service that get a lot of visiting "engineers" re tuning for one offs I have a spare set of eq cards there they get to use

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.