Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » The Crazy Things We Find in Film Cans (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: The Crazy Things We Find in Film Cans
Don Sneed
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Texas City, TX, USA
Registered: Aug 2001


 - posted 06-08-2004 01:40 PM      Profile for Don Sneed   Author's Homepage   Email Don Sneed   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When I was a young projectionist in the early 70's, I finish high school in 1973, I wrote inside the can lid Don Sneed Sr. "73", Galveston Texas...about 9-10 yrs latter while working at a drive-in theatre I recieved the same film can with about 20 names & dates written under mine, what is the chances of that happening again, I thought that was too cool back then, I wonder how many names in it now ??

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-09-2004 01:02 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nitrate's shrinkage issues were a consideration sometimes even before the print hit the projector.

The pre-talkies Pathecolor stencil process had to utilize detailed scales for shrinkage of the nitrate stock during the process of cutting stencils & applying color.

I've only seen a few examples of Pathecolor on video, but reports from those who've seen examples of it projected are that it was very consistent & good.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-09-2004 02:07 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Was pre-compensation for shrinkage (e.g. use a slightly smaller -sized polyester raw stock) not considered?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-09-2004 08:29 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Polyester (ESTAR) base prints are very stable dimensionally, and show little shrinkage during processing or aging. The perforation pitch is still 0.1870 inches (KS-1870 perforations), as you need to maintain the proper relationship on the contact printer sprocket. Consideration could be given to revisiting the diameter of the projector sprockets to optimize wear characteristics, but with the strength of polyester print film perfs, it's probably unnecessary.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 06-10-2004 02:55 AM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Recently I opened up a Technicolor can and saw the familiar label:
"Please return your dts discs"
and underneath it a new label:
"Fuck You"

Oh how the creative solution eludes us...Although I think the name in the can is definitely cool.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-10-2004 07:52 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Stephen: there was a huge amount of training material produced by projectionists in Britain during the time of the nitrate/acetate transition. Among the issues addressed were (i) new cement formulations for making joins, (ii) the need to maintain full scale fire precautions until nitrate had completely disappeared from circulation and (iii) identifying different sorts of element and how not to be fooled by a 'nitrate' or 'safety' edge mark printed through from a previous generation. In stark contrast to the protracted cyan tracks conversion, the trade papers reveal that (in Britain, at least) the nitrate to acetate conversion was pretty rapid: the first prints entered mainstream circulation around November 1949 and nitrate base ceased being imported into the UK by June 1950.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Joseph
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Palmdale, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 06-13-2004 01:09 AM      Profile for Jeff Joseph   Author's Homepage   Email Jeff Joseph   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There were certainly "mixed" prints in this country; I once saw a dye-transfer "Annie Get Your Gun" that was part nitrate, part safety.

And there were some nitrate trailers still being used for reissues in late 1950s. In one case, we've got a trailer with a replaced (safety) end title (the issuing company of the film had changed). But the bulk of the trailer is nitrate.

Jeff

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Kerchinsky
Master Film Handler

Posts: 326
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 06-13-2004 04:47 AM      Profile for Peter Kerchinsky   Email Peter Kerchinsky   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the good old days, we used to find stickers inside the top lid of the film cans asking for your vote for a certain business agent or some union offical.
Now, I pray when I open a film can from TES that it's the right film!

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 06-14-2004 08:31 PM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From a film can, circa 1976...

 -

/Mitchell

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 06-15-2004 01:09 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Should be ITS, not IT'S.

 |  IP: Logged

Rob Butler
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: Westford, MA, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 06-15-2004 02:00 PM      Profile for Rob Butler   Email Rob Butler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: John Pytlak
Ten years ago, prints were more likely to have been properly edgewaxed by the labs. People were trying to lubricate prints with WD-40, or mineral oil, which could leach out the oil-soluble dyes and cause mottle.
WD-40 on the prints? did that work? I'm pretty sure WD40 has a slight tint to it that would probibly darken the image on screen. Also, at one point it would seem like a bad idea to have an aresol can of WD-40 sitting next to a projector running nitrate film.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-15-2004 03:32 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
WD-40 should NOT be used on film! [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.