Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » A Note From Brad Miller (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: A Note From Brad Miller
Dean Kollet
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 591
From: Florida State University
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 09-03-2004 04:04 PM      Profile for Dean Kollet   Email Dean Kollet   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked it a lot, great idea. It was especially nice when the people at work (I won't say which group) saw the notice after telling me how bad FT is

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-03-2004 05:59 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We bad? Oh yeah! Uh huh!

 |  IP: Logged

Erica Peterson
Film Handler

Posts: 26
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 09-09-2004 10:30 PM      Profile for Erica Peterson   Author's Homepage   Email Erica Peterson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well...we got a copy of the note in our shipment of "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" from TES today. Unfortunately, in the very same film can was a blatant example of poor winding. [Frown] Love the note though - the photos came out well. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-09-2004 10:34 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Here is the Technicolor newsletter. Page 2 has the bit on smooth winding.

Do note the feedback@technicolor.com email address that has been set up for receiving field comments. If there is something they can do to make their service better, drop them an email about it. Alternatively, feel free to post something here, as the forum is checked regularly by TES management as well. The idea is to let them know what needs to be corrected. After all they can't fix what they don't know about.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 09-09-2004 10:42 PM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I got the full newsletter yesterday, but I received it as a fax, and not with a print.

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-10-2004 07:04 AM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sept 9, 2004
Received a copy of the "even wind" page in a can with "Terminal". The film had no academy leaders but somebody had used Mylar threading leader for about 2 feet on the beginning of each reel. The cans were sealed with green locks but there were no inspection tags on the film. The ends were attached with artist tape. The can contained reels 1, 2, 3 and a metal empty reel with the DTS disc between the flanges.
KEN

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 09-10-2004 10:22 PM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Kraus
I hope there will also be one about the importance of resplicing leaders
Well, I used to but since most prints are going to be plattered again, what's the point. On prints that don't get much play like Art or Classic I do splice leaders and tails back.
I got Brad's "Tip Sheet" in a print of DeLovely. Now I don't want to be too critical because whoever had the print before sent it back in flawless near mint condition. But, the heads were all spliced on but the tails were all taped on. That could cause some poor guy running reel-to-reel a headache thinking everything was intact [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Daniel Alt
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 111
From: Lakewood, OH, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 09-11-2004 10:50 AM      Profile for Daniel Alt   Email Daniel Alt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We got the note in our print of "Farenheit 9/11" last night. It was in the plastic box with the DTS disks. So I went looking for our MUT to make sure we were taking the film off the platter correctly.

Then I remembered that we're a changeover booth, and we don't have either.

But I sure hope this improves the quality of prints we get in. Thanks Brad!

 |  IP: Logged

Jacob Szewczyk
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Olney, Maryland, USA
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 09-12-2004 04:18 PM      Profile for Jacob Szewczyk   Email Jacob Szewczyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We got a note, too. I think it came in with one of our movies this week, but I don't know which one. We now have it hanging up at our main desk and have a note up saying to come to this site for good tips, which, hopefullly other projectionists will do.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Pandolfi
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 213
From: Milford, CT.
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 09-14-2004 09:13 PM      Profile for Joseph Pandolfi   Email Joseph Pandolfi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Got ours last week in Orange, CT. Don't know what print it came from, but it was posted at our make-up bench.

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Martin
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 203
From: Newington, CT USA
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 09-14-2004 10:37 PM      Profile for Barry Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Barry Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Got ours with Door in the Floor and Anchorman last Thursday, 9-3, as soon as I saw the name I knew it was worth reading. [Smile] Thanks Brad, I used to run a big 20 plex so I rarely saw used prints and what can happen in transit and now we still run mostly new product but the last few weeks have been running an "independent" film with a sub-run and I've received some real examples or "film done wrong". Thanks for trying to make a dent!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-15-2004 12:47 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Where is the mystical link to Film-Tech that was spoken of?

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-28-2004 06:42 AM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our print of "Anchorman" arrived late Thursday afternoon with Brad's illustrated note enclosed.

Reel one could have been the subject of his photo as there were several palces where the film was outside the pack and crushed in shipment. Some sections were 5 to 8 feet in length. They were so badly deformed that they would have opened the pads on the sprockets. Removing those sections yeilded a reel which looked like the TV late show with missing words and jump cuts. I called TES and they were happy to replace the reel.

The first reel had a leader with the correct title and one frame of the rating bar from a formerly attached trailer. All of the other reels had leaders from "Cinderella Story" with no check feames attached in random order, 2 0n 5, 3 on4, 4 on 3! It was not until I wound each reel to the end that there were corect tails with the title and "one check frame attached" that I was able to assemble the feature.

The booth is not equipped with a computer nor an incoming FAX. TES was willing to describe the check frames over the phone for me if I couldn't find the order of reels. That was a very kind gesture.

KEN

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 09-28-2004 09:54 AM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I thought it was discussed in the "outing bad film handlers" thread as well as a couple others that no one really reads notes that come with prints. Those who do take the time to stop and read the notices already care about doing a good job and thus care to see what the note has to say about potential presentation problems (like a fade-out at a reel or the fact that a reel is on another stock).

Unfortunately, those who DO need to read the notes and DO need to heed the good advice throw them in the trash so they can start spinning on the reels at full speed while they eat their Big Mac on the rewind bench.

Don't get me wrong, it's an excellent idea and reminds me of the "tips" pages that BV used to include in the cans, but it's like putting a bandage on gaping wound. [Frown]

I can see others have posted here that the cans included the note, but the reels are in the exact opposite condition it reccomends. Hopefully they were printed on recycled paper.

=TMP=

--edit--
quote: Edward Jurich
But, the heads were all spliced on but the tails were all taped on.
That's the result of the TES Integrity Check/Inspection. They only check the first 20 feet or so, thus they splice the head on properly, but the tail is left how the previous theater attached it.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-28-2004 10:32 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
TES is splicing leaders on now? I've gotten tons of "Integrity Inspected" prints with taped-on leaders. I've had some that were missing leaders completely, but I don't remember whether or not those were "Integrity Inspected" or not.

Admittedly, this has not happened in the last month or so, and it does appear that TES is trying to make improvements, for which they deserve to be commended (assuming that they actually follow through on their intentions).

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.