Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 5-Star Reverse Scan problem: (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: 5-Star Reverse Scan problem:
Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 10-17-2004 03:53 PM      Profile for Wolff King Morrow   Author's Homepage   Email Wolff King Morrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well the problem isn't really all that sudden. It has been bothering me for several months now. I kept replacing parts trying to chase it down, but only just last night did I finally figure out what it was. I set up an appointment with our company tech to have him address the issue.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 10-17-2004 06:52 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does that pre amp board have a ground connection on it. If it does try running a wire from the ground point to the frame of the soundhead. I have had the exact problem related to the house dimmers and got rid of it by grounding to the frame from the ground on a line amp for the Jax light. Now I know yours is different than a Jax light system but this may be something to look into and it may save a hell of a lot of time by preventing re-wiring.

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 10-17-2004 10:33 PM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
Whom ever told you that just because you have balanced inputs negates the need for a proper shield doesn't have a clue as to what they are talking about. What you just gave was very bad advice/information.

AH, but then you must not have any broadcast experience [Big Grin] A true balanced input will cancel any signal present on both wires, both wires being hot in a balanced system. Example, 30 years ago high quality audio was fed over "unshielded" pairs of telephone wires over "miles" from a radio station studio to a transmitter site. These lines had to met the spec of 50HZ to 15,000HZ with noise 55db down from 0db.
The solution is in fact temporary but yet, not an unsound (no pun intended) solution.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-18-2004 01:43 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually I do have broadcast experience and a vast knowledge of grounding.

In the case of broadcast...it is imperitive for the shield to be connected at both ends...this leads to a problem with audio since connecting shields at both ends often leads to a ground loop situation that causes audible hum. Often a solution to that situation has a capacitor in line with the shield at one end such that at high-frequencies both ends are terminated but at low-frequencies only one end is terminated.

As to balanced inputs...yes, one does take advantage of CMRR (Common mode rejection ratio) and as such if both wires are afflicted identically with noise, then, depending on how good the circuit really is, it should be supressed. Twisting the pair of wires goes a long way to increasing the likelihood that both wires are equally afflicted.

However, this does not negate the shield and to say it isn't needed is flat out wrong. Especially when one considers the path the cell wire often must take to get to the preamp...in a console there is nasty power all around and igniters...in the booth it may be traveling many feet.

I don't have a problem with the advice of trying to lift the shield to see if the noise goes away (indicating a grounding issue)...I do have a problem with dipensing advice that just is plain wrong. Getting away with something doesn't make it right nor good to advice others with.

Steve

[ 10-18-2004, 10:51 AM: Message edited by: Steve Guttag ]

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 10-18-2004 10:13 AM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In my case, I need to run new conduit because the current system, about 2 years old, was run with the audio line conduit near the AC and dimmer circuits. So whenever I get the time I'll be re-doing the audio runs.

However, getting back to shield/no shield, the SCR or TRIAC type dimmers tend to generate noise in the form of RF. So, if your audio lines are too close to the RF noise field, like in my case, the shield wire actually picks up the noise and feeds it into the audio ground system.

I once had to get our FM out of a church PA system. They used an Altec amplifier with balanced inputs. They had installed the amplifier at the back of the church and ran the mike cables through the ceiling the entire length of the church. The ONLY way to get rid of the RF was to lift the shield wire off every mike connector at the amplifier. No grounding scheme worked, I even tried going to a water pipe.

Here's one you'll like. An Am station with a newsroom studio that I just could not seem to get RF out of the console. Studios were located at the transmitter site. This was an old RCA tube console. One day I decided remodel the studio and tear the old soundproofing tiles off the walls. It was the old tin tiles with holes and insulation inside. When I pulled the tin tiles off I discovered that someone had run ground straps behind all the tin I guess to try and make a big shielded studio. What they did was create a RF nightmare. Since the tin tiles just pushed into steel rails, over the years the tin and steel corroded creating thousands of diode junctions that detected the AM RF and fed right into the console ground system. Once all the tile was off the wall the RF problem was gone.

As a closing note, I've found that good engineering practice does not always work and what's right is what works. [beer]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-18-2004 10:54 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have yet to find when good engineering practice did not work for noise elimination and the "what works is what is right" attitude tends to beget unstable systems.

Sorry, I don't buy it.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-18-2004 12:46 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"I have yet to find when good engineering practice did not work for noise elimination and the "what works is what is right" attitude tends to beget unstable systems."
Also it not only make unstable but in some case dangerous situations athat also may contravene other laws
I have never found an instance where unsheilding improvement occurs that didn't indicate a bad grounding scheme to start with
again this is a case where a little knowledge could be dangerous if missapplied
if in doubt get back to basics first

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 10-18-2004 11:28 PM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh well, [Wink] I suspect the original problem in this thread was figured out anyway and my unshielded pair has been working fine (and stable [Big Grin] ) for several weeks now.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 10-18-2004 11:33 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe if you sheilded those wires you'd know that less than three days have passed. Weeks generally have at least 7 days in them, each! [Smile]

Can't say it's hard to agree with Steve and Gordon.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-19-2004 03:32 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Gord Mcleod
Also it not only make unstable but in some case dangerous situations athat also may contravene other laws

And here's proof he should have really been a trial attorney instead of a poet...... [uhoh] .

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-19-2004 08:02 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Looking back over this thread, I see Gordon said, "lamp dimmers should not be wired onto the same pahse as lowlevel components of the soundsystem."

I always get confused when this comes up. Can someone explain this to me, either theoretically or practically?

Is the above just shorthand for "on the same phase in the same panel," i.e. "with a conductor in common, such that a large load on the dimmers would result in a voltage drop to the lowlevel components"? Or is it something else?

I've heard people assert that worrying about phasing in common of devices is an urban legend...

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-19-2004 09:10 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In a perfect world sound systems would have there own tranfsformer to provide isolatedd clean power
dimmers should at least be on a different phase thow than sensitive devices

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-19-2004 10:11 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jhawk,
The reason is because dimmers typically are very noisy devices. The noise emitted from them can be spread both though proximity coupling and back through the AC line. Hence the need a seperate phase for the dimmers and located some distance from the nearest audio component in the system. Dimmers in a console with an integral sound system are sometimes problematic in relation to the dimmers. Seems like no matter what type of device they use to handle the load, SCR, Triac, SSR, ETC there are alot of by products generated. The quietest way to dim lights is with the old Variac type dimmer. There have been magnetic type dimmers but they are obsolete due to the economical and flexible nature of solid state dimmers.

Mark @ CLACO

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 10-20-2004 09:32 AM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The best thing is to have dimmers mounted as far away in the building from the booth as possible. Here for some reason, they could have done that but put them in the booth. But then for some reason they did not provide any ventilation in the booth and it gets hotter than h'll after a couple hours. OK, so they didn't know what they were doing [uhoh]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-20-2004 11:10 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Light Dimmer Circuits:

http://www.epanorama.net/documents/lights/lightdimmer.html

quote:
The modern thyristor (Triac or SCR) dimmer has one fairly severe drawback in its performance in that it dims by switching on the current to the load part-way through each mains cycle. Cutting the leading smooth-part off a mains cycle produces a current with a very rapid turn-on time which generates both mains distortions and EMI. Chokes are included in dimmers to slow down the rapid switch-on (rise time) of the chopped current. The longer the rise time the less EMI and mains distortion produced.

Turn on of the triac in the middle of the phase causes fast voltage and current changes. A typical thyristor/triac starts to fully conduct at around 1 microsecond time after triggering, so the current change is very fast if it not limited in any way. Those fast voltage and current changes cause high frequency interference going to mains wiring unless there are suitable radio frequency interference (RFI) filter built into the circuit. The corners in the waveform effectively consist of 50/60Hz plus varying amounts of other frequencies that are multiples of 50/60Hz. In some cases the interference goes up to 1..10Mhz frequencies and even higher. The wiring in your house acts as an antenna and essentially broadcasts it into the air. Cheap bad quality light dimmers don't have adequate filtering and they cause easily lots of radio interference.

Dimmer circuits typically use coils that limit limit the rate of rise of current to that value which would result in acceptable EMI. Typical filtering in light dimmers causes the current rise time (current rises from 10% to 90%) to be in range of 30..50 microseconds. This gives acceptable results in typical dimmer applications in home (typically this limitation is made using 40..100 uH coil).

If the dimmers are used in places where dimmer is a serious problem for sensitive sound equipments (theatres, TV-studios, rock concerts etc.) a slower current rise time would be preferred. Typically the current rise time in light dimmer packs made for stage applications have a current rise speed of around 100..350 microseconds. If noise is a big problem (TV studios etc.), even slower current rise times are sometimes asked. Those current rise times up to 1 millisecond can be achieved with special dimmers or suitable extra coil fitted in series with the dimmer.

The coil itself does not typically solve the whole problem because of the self-capacitance of the inductor: they typically resonate below 200 kHz and look like capacitors to disturbances above the resonance frequency. That's why there must be also capacitors to suppress the interference at higher frequencies.

If your dimmer circuit cause interference, you can try to filter out the interference by adding a small capacitor (typically 22nF to 47 nF) in parallel with the dimmer circuit as near as possible to the electronics inside the circuit as possible. Keep in mind to use a capacitor which is rated for this kind of applications (use capacitors marked with X). Keep in mind that the filter capacitor and it's wiring make a resonance circuit with certain resonance frequency (typically around 3.6 MHz with 0.1 uF capacitor). The capacitor does not work well as filter with the frequencies higher than the resonance frequency of the circuit.



 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.