Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 70mm filmwinds on platter (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 70mm filmwinds on platter
Darren Briggs
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: York, UK
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 03-19-2005 06:19 PM      Profile for Darren Briggs   Author's Homepage   Email Darren Briggs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I run 70mm with mag in (emulsion out) to keep lacing the same as for 35mm (same twists etc that rollers are set up for.
This as long as the rollers are aligned well, and the filmis fed onto the take up plate striaght without dragging on the plate edge.
Have had no problems what so ever with this practice and have run probably more than 60 passes of prints like this in the last 2 years.

Darren

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-20-2005 05:39 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller (same point also made by Steve Guttag)
Anyone handling a 70mm print had damn well better be far better than simply knowing which way to thread the film so the mag tracks are up against the heads was always the way I looked at it.
Yes - you would hope that only professionals would ever get to handle 70mm. I was just suggesting that the convention identified by Monte came about as an extra safety net. The same applies to full-gate silent prints: you'd hope that only properly trained projectionists would ever show them, but I've lost count of the number of times I've sat in the theatre and seen the opening titles come up in mirror writing.

quote: Stephen Furley
The negatives which I had returned to me from a lab a few years ago were wound emulsion out; in response to a question from myself somebody replied that negatives are always stored this way.
That's not what the SMPTE or FIAF recommend, at least for nitrate and acetates. I'll look up the relevant standards and quote the chapter and verse if you like (and if John P doesn't beat me to it!). I frequently get preservation elements back from labs emulsion out, too, and have to reverse them before they go into the vault. I think this is simply the way they came out of the drying machine rather than anything deliberate.

quote: Stephen Furley
I'm sorry, but I don't follow this either. I do find that particularly with polyester prints I sometimes need to look quite closly to see which is the emulsion side, but it would be difficult to mistake which side of a print the mag stripes are on, surely.
Difficult, but not impossible, especially if the print is being handled by someone who isn't used to running mag. And all human beings can make mistakes. As I said, I'm only suggesting that this is a convention, not a technical necessity.

Incidentally, I seem to remember someone telling me that mag-striping the emulsion side of acetate elements required the use of a chemical which was so environmentally incorrect that the EU banned it years ago and the mere mention of its name is enough to give the Swampy brigade multiple heart attacks. I don't know how true this is, though.

quote: Stephen Furley
In the 'French' section of MOMI the picture was direct rear projected, i.e. no mirror. Was a special reversed print made for this, or was it a special projector, with the sound head on the opposite edge?
It's been 13 years since I worked there, and I'm afraid I really can't remember. Those compilations were all specially made prints anyway (thanks to those horrid endless loop platters, the prints only lasted for a couple of months each), and there were several other BP installations in there - the screen above the mock Odeon frontage, for example.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-21-2005 09:47 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
Incidentally, I seem to remember someone telling me that mag-striping the emulsion side of acetate elements required the use of a chemical which was so environmentally incorrect that the EU banned it years ago and the mere mention of its name is enough to give the Swampy brigade multiple heart attacks. I don't know how true this is, though.

The solvents used in the binders for magnetic striping formulations can be handled properly, but meeting environmental regulations can be costly, especially for low volume film striping operations as opposed to making magnetic tape. Even magnetic tape manufacturers like Quantegy have struggled:

Quantegy Article About Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Process

quote:
Analogue tape consists of three primary components: the base film, the magnetic coating and the back coating. The Mylar (polyester) base film is shipped to the plant on industry standard 660mm (28-inch) wide rolls. The coatings are manufactured on site from a variety of different ingredients depending on the application. The magnetic coating, for example, includes the magnetic oxide, binder, lubricants, whetting agent and solvent, and so on. For analogue tape there can be as many as 26 ingredients. Quantegy actually produces 57 different tape products using 16 basic formulae.

Contrary to popular belief few tape manufacturers actually produce their own magnetic particles. These are normally bought in from specialist suppliers.

The mixing of the ingredients is done in the Mix-Prep building. A critical part of the process is to ensure that the magnetic particles are evenly distributed throughout the binder. Another important consideration is to avoid breaking the magnetic particles as this generates non-magnetic particles, which reduces the sensitivity of the tape or creating clumps of particles, which increases distortion. Milling is the first stage of the process and this is done in large diameter drums containing either glass beads, steel balls or even stone pebbles. This can take up to 72 hours for an analogue tape. Video formulations tend to take less time as the magnetic particles are needle shaped and are therefore more easily damaged. The magnetic coating for video is also produced in individual batches whereas audio tape is treated differently.

Having the consistency of flour, the magnetic particles once mixed with the other ingredients, is stored as a slurry ready to be pumped to the coating area. For audio, typically 400 gallons of mix will be produced at a time and this 400-gallon mix is then added to a 1,500-gallon blend tank. This ensures that any variation, no matter how slight, is offset by the much larger quantity of mix already in the blend tank. This is important for consistency. It takes about a gallon of mix to produce a 2,500ft reel of 2-inch tape...

Once the mix has been applied, the magnetic domains in the coating need to be aligned. This is done by passing the through a strong magnetic field that aligns the North and South poles of the magnetic particles down the length of the jumbo tape. Once this has been done the coating is dried by running the tape through a series of large ovens that vary in temperature from 150°F to 100°F. The length of these drying lines, and the speed at which the freshly coated tape travels, varies according to the product (audio or video) being made. Oven lengths vary between 200ft-500ft and the tape travels between 200ft-800ft per minute.

What is remarkable is that throughout the drying process the tape does not touch anything, but is suspended on a cushion of air as it travels the length of the oven.

Once dried the surface of the magnetic coating is calendered. This is done by passing the tape between two rollers, one made from stainless steel and with a mirror like finish, and the other made of paper or plastic with a measured amount of give in it. This literally irons the surface of the tape forcing the binder that has risen to the surface during the drying process back into the magnetic coating and imparting the characteristic gloss like finish to the recording side of the tape...

Back in Opelika, a lot of the work done by the Chemistry Lab is concerned with quality control, both of incoming materials and during the manufacturing process itself. The staff is also involved in research work as well. One of the key responsibilities is to ensure that the correct amount of catalyst is being added to the magnetic coating. With as many as 10 different mixes being use on a shift this has to be constantly checked. Another important criteria is the mix viscosity. This has to be carefully monitored and it is also critical that the mix ingredients are probably dispersed. All these things are constantly being checked.



 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-21-2005 01:53 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
..Course, you know that the AMPEX/Quantegy Opelika plant has shut down due to bankruptcy..yet rumours of reopening is in the works.. - Monte

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-21-2005 03:33 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I did say that some magnetic tape manufacturers were "struggling".

 |  IP: Logged

Christian Appelt
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 505
From: Frankfurt, Germany
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 03-21-2005 04:20 PM      Profile for Christian Appelt   Email Christian Appelt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is there a company left that does 70mm (6-track) and 35mm (4-track) print striping, or have they all stopped operation because of environmental regulations?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-22-2005 04:54 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whoops, sorry John. I missed that last sentence that mentioned this on what you said.

Yet, it's sad to see such demand for analog recording medium gradually diminish for digital medium being that the magnetic medium can reproduce the true analog waveform more faithfully than the digital.

-thx Monte

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.