|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Multitasking of employ with projection department
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-30-2005 08:56 AM
Selling tickets at the concession stand can work on slow nights, especially in a single-screen venue which doesn't do much concession business.
Having one person run the whole theatre is insane. I did it once at a single-screen when the concession person didn't show up and it was hectic and not really safe, especially for an all-cash business. I don't know what I would have done if anything had gone wrong. This was in a non-automated changeover house (6000' reels), but even with platters and automation it would be a bad idea.
My view is that a single-screen theatre requires a minimum staff of three: one each for concession, boxoffice, and projection. The boxoffice person can go home after the last show of the day starts and the cash is counted and boxoffice report completed. On busier nights, a fourth person should be added--either in concession (if the stand is large enough to accommodate two employees) or as an usher/doorman. Larger theatres may want to add a fifth employee. In larger towns and cities, there should be at least two employees in the downstairs/lobby area at all times for obvious safety reasons.
I don't know much about staffing a multiplex, but I suspect that the same basic scheme would work for a twin or triple on weekday nights, but that a quad would require more staff.
As for "multi-skilling"--I have no problem with the idea that employees who have the necessary skills and desire to work in multiple positions can be effectively trained for all of those positions. I do have a problem with the idea of expecting anyone to perform two or more jobs at once. Concession employees shouldn't be sweeping theatres and projectionists shouldn't be ripping tickets, except on separate shifts.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Trimboli
Master Film Handler

Posts: 274
From: Perth Western Australia
Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 03-31-2005 05:02 AM
I too have multitasked. Not a good idea at all. This was in a single screen, having to do projection duties and still have to man box office and concession was crazy. The building was 4 stories with the bio box on the top floor, in the event of an emergency with the projectors it takes a good amount of time to get up there. I agree with Scott, have a minimum amount of 3 people on. I would actually have a shift supervisor, candy bar/floor and box office/floor and projection, that way they supervisor can sell tickets, and have either a second ticket seller, or 2 candy bar, or a floor person. Cutting back staff gives a theatre a really cheap look. Its not just going to see the movie that counts- its the WHOLE experience, waiting in a long line or have below average cleaning of a cinema is not an experience you want your customers to have!!! I could not get past the stupidity of the idiots that managed the place, cut staff and ever cost is the way to run a good cinema To sum up- multitask with the cinema workers. The projectionist are there to do their job and can help out if things were needed, but do not rely on them.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|