Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » EP 3 print problems (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: EP 3 print problems
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-20-2005 11:25 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No sound problems, but one of our prints had big black spots every few minutes throught the entire movie. Sometimes the spots were small and looked like dirt, sometimes they were huge, sometimes we had black scratches come and go, and we had a nice green scratch near a lab splice. Wonderful.

And to make it even better, the "print replacement lady" at Fox was a bitch to talk to. I don't know why she was so rude and condescending towards us. The kicker was when she said in a cocky tone "You know, we're going to need the other print back right away."

No freakin shit, lady. What the hell does she think we're going to do with it?? Just send the damn replacement already!

We did eventually get the replacement, but not in time for the midnite show. The "bad" print was certainly watchable, but way below an optimal presentation in our opinion. It will be interesting to hear what the lab says when they check it. The new print looks great... just like our other print.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 05-21-2005 12:58 AM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Dylan Marchetti
But if they had just "sold out" a 9pm show, that would've given them more than enough time to run the print
so you're suggesting that another studio's product not be run because fox can't deliver a print early enough for a proper run through? Second, you're suggesting that you turn customers away that come to see the "sold out" film just because fox can't deliver a print early enough for a proper run through?

 |  IP: Logged

Dylan Marchetti
Film Handler

Posts: 27
From: New York, NY
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 05-21-2005 12:47 PM      Profile for Dylan Marchetti   Author's Homepage   Email Dylan Marchetti   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, yes.

It's certainly Fox's fault for not getting the print out (which is why I'd try to cut a Fox title if possible). But still, Fox isn't going to have to explain to 500 guests why they don't get to see the movie they picked. One thing I've learned by managing, and I don't like it, is that while the temptation is to say "hey, if Fox wanted us to screen it, they should have delivered it yesterday", in the end, it all comes back to "______ Theater screwed up Star Wars for me, and I'm never going back". Customers are going to hold it against you, not Fox, no matter how hard you try to explain it or whose fault it really is.

So given a choice between possibly pissing off 500+ people who you won't be able to calm down, and cancelling a Wednesday late show that would maybe do 10 people (all of whom would be passed, of course), I see no contest. It's not the optimal situation, but it's certainly the better of the two options.

 |  IP: Logged

Bernie Anderson Jr
Master Film Handler

Posts: 435
From: Woodbridge, New Jersey
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 05-21-2005 01:06 PM      Profile for Bernie Anderson Jr   Author's Homepage   Email Bernie Anderson Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with the prescreening process. I worked for AMC were it is maditory that all print be watched. I think that is true for National Amusements too. But as for Loews, ever since there was a piracy issue with The Hulk two years ago in California, it came down from the top that there is no screening of prints. I've never prescreened a print there. So needless to say I take special extra care in making sure my prints are all together right. But then again, and alot of people in the company has agreed, that my booth, New Brunswick, is the best booth in the region.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-21-2005 01:31 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For what it's worth, I agree with Dylan. Cancel Kingdom Of Heaven and make sure Star Wars is ok.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-21-2005 01:44 PM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is a violation of master license agreements to cancel shows for pre-screening. The only possible way to do that using "proper management" would be to cancel another Fox show. Why would you cancel a show of Crash to make sure Star Wars is OK. Just refund the audience, issue readmits, and FOX is happy. I would then argue the point with my branch manager at FOX that those readmits (would give him the exact number issued) would NOT count against my pass allowance. Therefore, FOX pays for the problem through not receiving their 70% (or 90%) of the $$ for that show.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 05-21-2005 02:08 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Spaeth
Why would you cancel a show of Crash to make sure Star Wars is OK
Because I'd rather have 10 semi-irritated customers than 500 angry rabid star wars fans, and a front page story in the local news paper the next day about how my theater sucks.

Maybe it's difficult for some people to cancel a late show, but for us it's easy as attendance at these shows is generally low anyway. Sometimes ZERO.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-21-2005 02:24 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Up here pre screening usually specifically forbiden by the studio

 |  IP: Logged

Dylan Marchetti
Film Handler

Posts: 27
From: New York, NY
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 05-21-2005 08:00 PM      Profile for Dylan Marchetti   Author's Homepage   Email Dylan Marchetti   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Spaeth
Just refund the audience, issue readmits, and FOX is happy. I would then argue the point with my branch manager at FOX that those readmits (would give him the exact number issued) would NOT count against my pass allowance. Therefore, FOX pays for the problem through not receiving their 70% (or 90%) of the $$ for that show.
But the problem with that is that while your pass allowance may turn out OK, your audience is not. Fox loses out on their 70% for one show, but you lose out on those 500 customers (plus everyone they tell about what happened, or who reads about it on the front page of the paper) indefinitely- both admission and concession dollars. If you were in that showing, would you go back for the next event picture? I wouldn't.

Of course, this is a special occasion. For a film that's not opening at 12:01 that night, you just wait until everything's over, or show up early the next day to pre-screen. No decent manager will cancel a show just so they could get home a little earlier.

Smaller theatres have their own rules, and with limited screens, they've gotta do what they've gotta do. But in most 10+ plexes, with multiple prints and usually one title from each distributor at any given point, I can't see any excuse for not pre-screening.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert John Jeromson
Master Film Handler

Posts: 264
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 05-22-2005 04:24 PM      Profile for Robert John Jeromson   Email Robert John Jeromson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We had organised our film schedule for last week to include pre-screenings of Star Wars under the impression that they would arrive late and in split deliveries. Based on the delivery procedure for practically every other block-buster we had no reason to suspect otherwise. However they arrived early, on Tuesday and in one delivery so we managed an early "screentest" of one of the prints and did the other on Wednesday night before the midnights. They were both prestine, several lab splices but otherwise okay.

 |  IP: Logged

John T. Hendrickson, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 889
From: Freehold, NJ, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-22-2005 06:32 PM      Profile for John T. Hendrickson, Jr   Email John T. Hendrickson, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike Marshall and Dylan Marchetti-

You have to take note of Mike Spaeth's point: "It is a violation of master license agreements to cancel shows for pre-screening. The only possible way to do that using "proper management" would be to cancel another Fox show."

I had four prints come in while shows were running. As Projection Operations Manager, I have a great deal of descretion as to what happens in the booth. But... cancel four regularly scheduled shows of other companies, ( or Kindom of Heaven, for that matter) to screen four Star Wars prints? Are you out of your mind? That's not my call, and it's not a building manager's call either That's a call that only our owner could make, and I know the answer without even asking. He has other studios to deal with 52 weeks a year.

Life is not as simple as one may think in the multiplex.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-22-2005 10:22 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Incidently, one wonders what the leaders said on the Japanese(?) reel.

To put it differently, if you can't pre-screen, esp. for an "event" movie, then you should take twice as much care during inspection.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Dallas
Film Handler

Posts: 48
From: Prescott Valley, AZ
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 05-23-2005 05:52 AM      Profile for Alan Dallas   Email Alan Dallas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We got it lucky in our 14 Screener when it comes to trying to find a print with probelms by pre-screening. For some reason Harkins loves for us to hold onto movies longer than we should. Even to the point were the Movie in question hits DVD and we keep playing it for a week AFTER its DVD debut. And we're a First Run house!!

So with that said, canceling the last showing which sells no tickets 30 mins after it was 'supposed to start' becuase the damn thing is on DVD already doesn't really matter. Wed and Thursday night it's so dead in the Theatre we only need 1 Usher, 1 Concessionist, 1 Box office member and a Manager on the floor to run the entire place(not counting Projectionist)... at a 14 screener. [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-23-2005 12:39 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How come no one has mentioned that if they ran DTS, the language on the Dolby and SDDS tracks wouldn't have made a difference (assuming they got the correct CDs.)

And the manager didn't understand what happened? It happened at a reel change - wouldn't that make it obvious?

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 05-23-2005 02:18 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin Brooks
It happened at a reel change - wouldn't that make it obvious
Some managers are completely unaware of anything that happens upstairs.

If any shows should be canceled for screening, I'dve voted for Fever Pitch.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.