|
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
|
Author
|
Topic: How many theatres still have more than one projectionist?
|
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted 08-18-2005 12:58 AM
Now, I want to touch on this one side topic that still returns to the main topic, then I'll shut up it since it can easily go off-topic:
Do some of you remember, back in 1979-1980, when Detroit was pumping out cars that would fall apart within a year? And the Japanese automakers were "bombing" the US with their cars and "destroying" the US auto plants with their "car bombs" from the Mitsubishi M6M2 Zero dive bombers (this was an editorial cartoon that I saw at this time)?
This was called the "2nd Japanese Bombing of the US" - Bombing the Detroit plants with their Toyotas, Hondas, Datsuns, Subarus, Mazdas, etc.
By 1980, the Japanese were selling 30% more cars than the domestics were in the US. People demanded quality and they found it in the Japanese imports since the US domestics didn't have the quality. Detroit was in a whirlpool of confusion. They didn't know what to do. All they knew that the Japanese car had quality written all over it, to where theirs were written as junk. It took Detroit to finally wake up and learn to take lessons from the Japanese on how to build a good car. Did that hurt? You bet, it did-having to learn from a foreign country on how to make an excellent product. That really stung their pride, but they had to so they can still survive.
In Japan, the factory workers are treated with a high deal of respect. The owners has fantastic employment plans to ensure of their longetivity in employment with their company(ies).
There is housing plans for the employees offered by the manufacturers and benefit plans that will easily beat ours hands down. They even have exersize sessions during their work period to ensure that the workers are always in top health during production. In return, the workers are doing their absolute best in producing the best vehicles, or anything else, since they are treated like individuals, not robots and giving the feeling that they're not just doing a job, they're doing a service to the company(ies) and it's a career for the individual worker. ............................................................
With this above, is the basic reason of the 8 operators in a 16 screen cinema: the proprietor is giving the workers the feeling that what they are doing is a career, not a job. And the end results is quality and caring from the operators.
Money is not an issue with this for the proprietors (course,we don't know how much these operators are being paid, but it doesn't matter to the operators-just the feeling of being successful in serving the proprietor), just doing the service rendered to the public and rewarding the employees for their service.
..a two-way street here is being practiced: you rub my back, and I'll rub yours on equal terms.
-Monte [ 08-18-2005, 02:28 AM: Message edited by: Monte L Fullmer ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted 08-18-2005 01:00 PM
The 21 that I was booth manager at, we had 7 rooms: two rooms had 6 machines each, two rooms with 2 machines each, 3 single booths, and a "main booth" with 2 machines. "Main booth" is where our break/meetings were held, booth storage is located, all the trailers were stored, time clock was located..and my small office.
Since we were open at 11:am each day, a schedule was followed and was originated by me: one operator did the entire complex at opening, then another operator came on duty at 1:00. The opening operator left at 6:00 (or when the final matinee set was started..), the closing operator came in at 6:00. Then the operator that came in at 1:00, left after the final set of shows were started or 10:30, and the closing operator closed the entire complex with cleanup as each machine dropped. He was usually gone by 12:30a(unless we had midnight showing of certain hot movies, then the out time for that operator was longer).
I was placed on a budget of 210hrs/week upstairs. We were all on hourly wage. I managed to keep payroll under 185hrs with this schedule. Payroll was impressed that I was way under budget for booth operations (even my boss at home office was impressed on how I ran things there-we hardly had any problems and we were the only complex out of the state of CALIF).
Whereas downstairs had some struggles to keep their budget under control at times.
-Monte
| IP: Logged
|
|
Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004
|
posted 08-18-2005 02:23 PM
quote: Heath Dutton On Thursdays we have up to 4 projectionists here at the same time (2-3 building while one runs the set, or two running half the set while building, all depending on how many prints we are to receive).
On Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays during the hours of 3-9 (peak hours) we will have a second projectionist so that the set can be split in two. This is just for insurance (if a technical difficulty occurs one can handle the problem while the other runs the set).
We do one projectionist on all days except building days, which one projectionist builds during the day, while 2 other projectionists share the breakdowns, moves, and set threading at night. Usually it works out that no more than 2 projectionists are on the clock at any given Thursday.
By the way, we do 2 interlocks five days a week (open caption stuff), which requires moving prints 2 or 3 times a week and having to reschedule showtimes.
With regard to the Japanese system: My booth would be just as spotless if I could have 8 clones of me working simultaniously like that. But as things are, you just have to make do with what you get and do your best to get as much done as you can.
BTW using the goldberg platter reel, I've never had to have more than one person building, even when we get 8 prints in. The sucker is a life-saver!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1 2 3 4
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|