Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Martin / Carmike History Question (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Martin / Carmike History Question
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 10-18-2005 01:17 AM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jon Miller
Here you go, Michael... + IMAGE
That's it! That's the logo that appears in the 1984 ads I mentioned.

So now what? If Carmike was formed in '82, why was the Martin logo still being used in '84?

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 10-18-2005 02:30 AM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think perhaps the Patricks bought Martin in 82 and re-organized it into Carmike in 84. Or perhaps they did form Carmike in 84 but whatever reason ran Martin as a seperate corporation until 84?

I'm not sure how much luck you'll have but you could try calling/emailing Carmike's Public Relations person, Judy Russel. Her contact info should be on the website.

 |  IP: Logged

John McConnel
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 118
From: Okmulgee, OK USA
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 10-18-2005 02:39 PM      Profile for John McConnel   Author's Homepage   Email John McConnel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Carmike wasn't formed in '82. But 1982 is when Carl and Mike Patrick bought Martin theatres from Fuqua Industries.
Rather than re-organizing into Carmike in 1984, it's possible that the Patricks just re-named the existing corporation. However, they may have formed a new umbrella corporation. The technicalities of how the business was put together would be an interesting study.
As they acquired theatres around the country, in some cases Martin/Carmike bought the shares of stock in existing corporations that owned the theatres, which of course gave them control, and they then billed them as Martin Theatres, or later, Carmike Cinemas. But if you checked at the courthouse, the ownership of the property would still be in the name of the corporation that Martin or Carmike bought the stock in.
Regardless of how title was held at the courthouse, or at the Secretary of State, the theatres were considered as Martin, or Carmike, theatres.
Martin, and Carmike, did have some situations where they had partners. But those are about all gone.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.