Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby Digital WOW at reel change? (Page 3)

 
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
Author Topic: Dolby Digital WOW at reel change?
Max Biela
Film Handler

Posts: 89
From: Dortmund, Germany
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 01-04-2006 11:27 AM      Profile for Max Biela   Email Max Biela   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi,

I just put in a loop with music and it also happens on our CP 650. However, we don't have any problems with splices and cues. I will check the firmware version later.

Max

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-04-2006 12:51 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, Max.

Do you use foil cues along the edges of the film, or something else?

 |  IP: Logged

Max Biela
Film Handler

Posts: 89
From: Dortmund, Germany
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 01-04-2006 01:05 PM      Profile for Max Biela   Email Max Biela   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, but those cues are very very thin (from CPI) and are on the back side on the film so they doesn't cover up any blocks. The two arms on the Cat 702 don't bounce from cues made with the CPI stuff. I will check the sound with a few different splices on the same loop tomorrow.

Max

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Schultz
Film Handler

Posts: 28
From: Tehachapi, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 01-04-2006 09:49 PM      Profile for Robert Schultz   Author's Homepage   Email Robert Schultz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OK...I suspected outside forces and oscillation of some kind to be the culperate of the WOW so this is where I started looking first. I found the problem very quickly actually, and really it's quite simple. Brad put in his 2 cents and suspected the splices, but he had never seen the problem himself (neither had I). I can now say that I've seen a bad splice cause WOW when using a Cat. 701 reader.

The culprit...a splicer that leaves hanging edges beyond the 35mm width of the film? Simple. All sound readers are subject to errors or reading problems at or around a splice, but in this case, my customer was using solid yellow splicing tape and had a splicer that was so gummed up that each splice was a bit different from the last. The inconsistency in splices (and the fact that they have 4 different splicers) made some splices go through just fine, while others would bounce the rollers on the Cat. 701 all over the place. Another factor to contend with is that the problem is not normally heard unless there is some steady tones to make the wow audible (like music). In a 'dialog only' scene it is much harder to hear the WOW problem.

One problem I am still having is that once a large amount of bouncing starts it seems to take about 20 seconds for the reader to get back to a completely steady state. There should be some better dampening in this system, but the platter tension is so soft (almost non-existent) that it's letting the reader oscillate like a spring with no dampening to quickly stop the problem.

The fix to this problem right now is to just simply make better splices. I was able to find a film at this theatre that had a great example of the type of splices that cause the problem. The picture below is a great example of what NOT TO DO! I have seen people adjust their splicers to leave just a small edge hanging so that it's easy to see the splices when breaking down prints (I am not a fan of this), but at this theatre, this was not the intention. No matter what, splicers should be adjusted to make as clean and smooth a splice as possible.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-04-2006 10:03 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
There is an airpot adjustment inside the cat701 you can adjust to minimize that bouncing.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-04-2006 10:44 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Robert Schultz
The fix to this problem right now is to just simply make better splices.
Really????? The real fix is to get rid of the person who made these splices in the first place!

 |  IP: Logged

Max Biela
Film Handler

Posts: 89
From: Dortmund, Germany
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 01-05-2006 03:38 AM      Profile for Max Biela   Email Max Biela   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Really????? The real fix is to get rid of the person who made these splices in the first place!

Really? [Confused] I know some places where simply isn't enough money for a new CIR U-blade or other parts.

EDIT: Firmware version is 2.2.5.0

[ 01-05-2006, 07:27 AM: Message edited by: Max Biela ]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-06-2006 08:08 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, we have three crappy splicers (but not so bad that they make splices like THAT), but we won't replace them or get them refurbished for fear of managers losing their quarterly bonuses. [Frown]

Our firmware is also 2.2.5.0. I'm curious if the folks who have 650s that don't warble have the same version.

Also, does anyone know what the latest firmware version is?

 |  IP: Logged

Christos Mitsakis
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 242
From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-06-2006 10:35 AM      Profile for Christos Mitsakis   Email Christos Mitsakis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Current CP650 firmware is version 2.5.5.3. It aderesses only a problem of the volume indicator. Otherwise it is exactly the same as 2.5.5.0.

Christos.

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-07-2006 01:11 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Always have a scissor at hand and trim the edjes of the splice as to have the same width as the film.
D

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-07-2006 02:25 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i'm a little late getting around to posting this, but i just wanted to point out that on both our bacp reader and our cat. 700, there are blocks preventing the tension rollers from moving so far as to let film come into contact with that bar, so there's no chance of scratching. is the cat 702 different?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-07-2006 07:39 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Correction to the above post...the current CP650 firmware is 2.2.5.3. Dolby is still working on 2.3.x.x and is no where near a 2.5.x.x.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Christos Mitsakis
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 242
From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-07-2006 11:08 AM      Profile for Christos Mitsakis   Email Christos Mitsakis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you Steve [beer]
I did mean 2.2.5.3 but typing in a hurry gives these results. There is also another orthographical "in a hurry" error in my post.
Christos.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Espinosa
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1172
From: California, U.S.A.
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 01-07-2006 01:35 PM      Profile for Dominic Espinosa   Email Dominic Espinosa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As you move the rollers the film is changing speed, wouldn't this cause some data to be read faster or slower?
With the data moving faster the sound would be reproduced faster thus shortening the wavelengths and raising the pitch right?

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Raskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1100
From: Manassas Virginia
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 01-07-2006 01:49 PM      Profile for Rick Raskin   Email Rick Raskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
FWIW: As I read this thread I was somewhat confused as to how you could have WOW, which I understand to be an analog type defect, appear in a digital system. But then I read Mark's post about data block errors and realized that the incoming data is block oriented, allowing for some recovery mechanism in the upper layer protocols. I believe that what was identified as WOW is actually the digital system attempting to re-synchronize to the incoming data stream following a data loss (of less than 4 blocks) caused by a defective splice.

Question: Is there a method to track CRC or similar errors on this system? If so, that would be a dead give away.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.