Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Curious about DA-20 error readings (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Curious about DA-20 error readings
Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 04-10-2006 06:58 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think it has to do with the software, it's probably just a clearer image as the test films were created very early on for obvious reasons. The negative has never been updated as it works fine for the intended purpose.

 |  IP: Logged

Eric Robinson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 538
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Registered: Jan 2005


 - posted 04-12-2006 11:56 PM      Profile for Eric Robinson   Email Eric Robinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As a newbie on the block I mistakenly used Dolby Digital test film along with DRAS to set my azimuth and lateral values to "0".

I then learned at a later point in time that each piece of Dolby Digital test film has a handwritten calibration error value. The test film I am using now requires that I set azimuth to "-2" and lateral position to "+1.6" due to the printing error on the test film.

I always use a couple of brand new trailers from different vendors to run through after I have performed a digital alignment so I can view the results of my efforts. Then when the film in use gets run my numbers go in the tiolet.

When ever a theatre employee complains to me, though, that they are having digital error rate issues I always ask them to run a brand new trailer through during a break to see if there really is a problem with the alignment.

ERIC

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Curran
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 504
From: Springwood NSW Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 04-13-2006 04:25 AM      Profile for Ron Curran   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Curran   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Unfortunately, as has been pointed out many times, the digital dots are in one of the most vulnerable areas on the print. They will work without dropouts for a long time if the print is run by careful operators.

If perfect colour filters could be invented, the dots could be printed magenta where the cyan analog track is – but that is probably too hard.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-13-2006 05:43 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Remember that the computer hookup occurs after error correction and is mostly useless for full set up on Dolby Digital. There really is no substitute for the proper scope. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-13-2006 07:06 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Ron Curran
If perfect colour filters could be invented, the dots could be printed magenta where the cyan analog track is – but that is probably too hard.
The Kodak/ORC Cinema Digital Sound (CDS) digital sound system printed a dye track in the current analog track area. Cyan dye is used for red LED readers, magenta dye would work best with green LEDs:

http://members.aol.com/cds3570/

quote:
The first commercially available digital sound-on-film system for theatrical motion pictures, CDS is gone now. Today we have DTS-Digital, Dolby Digital, and Sony Dynamic Digital Sound. In fact SDDS was designed by some of those who pioneered CDS.

What went wrong? Well opinions here vary. Some would say that the choice to use minimal data reduction and the resulting very small bit (pixel) size made the system much more susceptible to every type of problem including print wear, film lab errors etc. Others will point out the fact that the lack of a backup analog track (In 35mm CDS sound was printed in the same area were the analog optical track would normally go) would forever make CDS a premium process, requiring dual print inventories, not to mention making the occasional breakdown catastrophic and reputation destroying. Some have said the electronics simply wasn't reliable enough for hot projection booths. But everyone agreed on this: When it worked and it really DID work quite well the vast majority of the time, IT SOUNDED GREAT!


 |  IP: Logged

Ron Curran
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 504
From: Springwood NSW Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 04-13-2006 07:25 AM      Profile for Ron Curran   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Curran   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks John. The Colortech system didn't get a hearing either, though it sounded promising. I was pipe-dreaming about the analog and digital tracks sharing the same area if they could be discretely colour-seperated.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 04-24-2006 01:38 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This week, Silent hill played with a 2-rate. Benchwarmers is running at 5. What? Set it so they both run at 4?

This sucks.

(Joe's "pointy-finger" picture goes here!)

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 04-24-2006 02:28 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It doesn't really matter if it runs stably around 5. Remember, that doesn't make it sound any different, unless it goes above 8 and drops out.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 04-24-2006 03:22 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, I know, Michael.
It just doesn't seem like that's the way it should be... that's all. Otherwise, it does work OK, and nobody knows about it but me. You just get the feeling that some quality control issue is falling through the cracks, and it doesn't seem right that TRAILERS should come up with better readings.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-24-2006 01:13 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My guess is that trailers are printed relatively slowly compared to the actual feature. Louis

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.