|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: DTS burn disc question
|
Charles Greenlee
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 801
From: Savannah, Ga, U.S.
Registered: Jun 2006
|
posted 07-07-2006 01:01 AM
Basically my point, just alot better explained. Also, I agree, the people who are shareing the movie that they recorded with a cam, aren't likely to do much more than unse the cam's onboard mic. Maybe, maybe, they might patch in to the soudsystem. But that would require an insider, which should be shot, resurrected and then killed slowly again, by the anthill torture. I do know of another way to get the sound, and I will not mention it because the pirates are probably not smart enough to think of it, and I'd assume they can read this site, and some probably do. However, you guys are more than welcome to mention it. I just don't want to divulge any information on that in case they haven't come up with it yet. [ 07-07-2006, 02:03 AM: Message edited by: Charles Greenlee ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oliver Pasch
Film Handler

Posts: 53
From: Europe
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 07-07-2006 09:41 AM
quote: Brad Miller Pirates are stupid.
Unfortunately wrong! quote: Brad Miller They aren't going to go to the hassle of trying to decode DTS discs
Unfortunately wrong too!
Believe me, they did in the past, when it was still possible to playback a dts-disc on a PC (in stereo only) or, even worse, they owned dts-cinema-equipment and learnt from forums like this one how to start the discs from a keyboard, without the 35mm-print of course. This used to be the no. 1 source for piracy-media with 5.1-sound!
Please remember: there's life outside the US, that might be a little delayed when it comes to the movie business, but it happened every now and then that we had piracy media in our terretories with the picture based on the DVD already released in your country and the dub-sound in 5.1. dts was (again: past tense!) the easiest and most convenient source.
dts did their homework with the "enhanced security" to face this situation, but the problem of the format not having returned completely into the German business is still the lack of "watermarking"-capabilities (which is no different from other formats, only that those can be manipulated on the individual print by intentionally damaging the tracks at registered sections of the prints, which is no better by the way).
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|